Analysis of Fat Grafts for Stabilizing Microvascular Pedicle Geometry in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Abstract

Background Even after careful microanastomosis, microsurgeons sometimes encounter unexpected twisting, kinking, and destabilizing mechanical forces. In these cases, a small fat graft is a useful technique for stabilizing the pedicle geometry in free flap transfer. However, few reports have provided the details with an analysis of fat graft use. The use of fat grafts for free flap transfer in head and neck reconstruction was reviewed.

Materials and Methods This was a retrospective review of 157 patients (116 men, 41 women; average ± SD age: 64 ± 13.1 years) who had undergone head and neck reconstruction with free flap transfer between 2010 and 2016. We used a fat graft to stabilize pedicle geometry to prevent kinking and other problems. Postoperative thrombosis formation and the use of a fat graft at the pedicle depending on recipient vessel selection and reconstructed site were examined.

Results In 23 patients (14.6%), fat grafting was performed to correct pedicle geometry. A fat graft was used at the arterial anastomosis in 13 patients and at the venous anastomosis in 10. There were no significant differences in postoperative thrombosis formation depending on the use of a fat graft. However, fat grafts were more likely to be performed with the superior thyroid artery as a recipient artery and in tongue and/or oral cavity reconstruction.

Conclusion A fat graft is a reliable and easy procedure to correct pedicle geometry. However, reconstructive surgeons should consider the use of a fat graft based on the selection of the recipient vessels and the recipient site.

Keywords

microsurgery - fat graft - pedicle - head and neck - free flap

• References

• 1 Hidalgo DA, Jones CS. The role of emergent exploration in free-tissue transfer: a review of 150 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (03) 492-498
• 2 Heller L, Levin LS. Lower extremity microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (04) 1029-1041
• 3 Hyodo I, Nakayama B, Kato H. , et al. Analysis of salvage operation in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (02) 357-360
• 4 Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP. , et al. Timing of pedicle thrombosis and flap loss after free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (07) 1230-1233
• 5 Bar-Meir ED, Yueh JH, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Autologous fat grafting: a technique for stabilization of the microvascular pedicle in DIEP flap reconstruction. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (07) 495-498
• 6 Sader C, Hart R, Trites JRB, Phillips T, Rigby MH, Taylor SM. Fat graft pedicle stabilization in head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 893-895
• 7 Yagi S, Nakayama B, Kamei Y, Takahashi M, Torii S. Posterolateral cervical vein as a recipient vein in reconstructive microvascular surgery of the head and neck. J Reconstr Microsurg 2007; 23 (01) 19-23
• 8 Yagi S, Kamei Y, Torii S. Donor side selection in mandibular reconstruction using a free fibular osteocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (06) 622-627
• 9 Urken ML, Vickery C, Weinberg H, Buchbinder D, Biller HF. Geometry of the vascular pedicle in free tissue transfers to the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115 (08) 954-960
• 10 Yagi S, Suyama Y, Fukuoka K, Takeuchi H, Kitano H. Recipient vessel selection in head and neck reconstruction based on the type of neck dissection. Yonago Acta Med 2016; 59 (02) 159-162
• 11 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H. , et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (06) 363-368