Jnl Wrist Surg 2018; 07(02): 109-114
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607328
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A New Wrist Clinical Evaluation Score

Guillaume Herzberg
Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
,
Marion Burnier
Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
,
Toshiyasu Nakamura
Clinical Research Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

10 August 2017

12 September 2017

Publication Date:
30 October 2017 (eFirst)

Abstract

Background The number of available wrist scoring systems is limited; some of them do not include forearm rotation criteria.

Purpose To describe a new electronic wrist clinical score and to present a new patient's generated wrist evaluation criterion, the subjective wrist value (SWV).

Materials and Methods A new electronic wrist clinical score, the Lyon wrist score (LWS) including wrist VAS pain and function, active range of motion and strength was built into an excel file. VAS flexion-extension pain and function were evaluated independently from pronation-supination pain and function. A new patient's generated wrist evaluation criterion, SWV was described.

Results The LWS is available in two versions, standard and full (the latter including forearm rotation strength). Both standard and full LWS are displayed into an automatically generated diamond-shaped graph providing a comprehensive visual display of the clinical status of most osteoarticular wrist disorders. The graph also includes SWV. The LWS, combined with SWV into a graph that may be directly exported to a PowerPoint presentation, provide a new practical and comprehensive tool for following/comparing wrist osteoarticular clinical status/outcomes. Both standard and full LWS charts are available in colored versions on a related website for free download.

Conclusion A comprehensive updated electronic display of osteoarticular wrist clinical status including forearm rotation criteria is provided and displayed into a graph which may be exported as such into a PowerPoint presentation for clinical analysis/comparisons.

Level of Evidence Level II.