CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2017; 58(03): 084-088
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606596
Original Article | Artículo Original
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Estudio comparativo de reconstrucción de ligamento cruzado anterior con y sin lesiones condrales; resultados funcionales a largo plazo

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with and without Chondral Lesions; Long Term Functional Results
David Figueroa
1   Clínica Alemana, Unidad de la Rodilla, Santiago, Chile
2   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
,
Sergio Arellano
2   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
,
Andrés Schmidt-Hebbel
2   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
,
Carlos Gomez
2   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
,
Rafael Calvo
1   Clínica Alemana, Unidad de la Rodilla, Santiago, Chile
2   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
,
Alex Vaisman
1   Clínica Alemana, Unidad de la Rodilla, Santiago, Chile
2   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

09. April 2017

07. August 2017

Publikationsdatum:
12. September 2017 (online)

Resumen

Introducción La lesión del ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA), es una patología frecuente, y el éxito de la reconstrucción depende de diversos factores, tales como la técnica quirúrgica empleada, la edad del paciente, índice masa corporal, nivel de actividad y lesiones asociadas. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados funcionales a largo plazo de pacientes con lesiones condrales tratadas y sin lesiones condrales sometidos a la reconstrucción de LCA (RLCA), con autoinjerto semitendinoso-gracilis (ST-G).

Materiales y Métodos Estudio analítico retrospectivo. Cuarenta y nueve pacientes (34 hombres y 15 mujeres), fueron sometidos a la RLCA con autoinjerto ST-G. Se compararon dos grupos. Grupo RLCA + LC: 24 pacientes con lesiones condrales ICRS grado III y IV tratadas en el mismo acto quirúrgico y grupo RLCA: 25 pacientes sin lesiones condrales concomitantes. Las edades promedio fueron de 32 y 28 años en cada grupo respectivamente. La funcionalidad de los pacientes a largo plazo fue evaluada con el test de Lysholm, IKDC y retorno deportivo. Se compararon los promedios de los scores funcionales según cada grupo con Test de Mann-Whitney. La asociación entre ambos grupos y el retorno deportivo se analizó con Test de Chi2. Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron con Stata IC 13.

Resultados El seguimiento promedio fue de 106,8 meses (rango: 86–125). Los resultados funcionales obtenidos al comparar el grupo RLCA + LC vs grupo RLCA fueron significativamente peores en el primero, con un promedio del score de Lysholm de 84,87 vs 94,52 (p = 0.0001) e IKDC de 84,43 vs 92,08 (p = 0,004), respectivamente. El retorno deportivo de cada grupo fue de 70,8% y 88% (p = 0,136).

Conclusión La funcionalidad a largo plazo de los pacientes con una RLCA y que tengan alguna LC profunda tratada concomitante, es significativamente inferior que aquellos pacientes con RLCA aislada. No existen diferencias significativas en el porcentaje de retorno deportivo entre ambos grupos. Nivel de evidencia: tipo IV

Abstract

Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament injury is a frequent sports injury, and successful reconstruction depends on diverse factors, such as surgical technique, age, body mass index, level of activity and other concomitant cartilage and meniscal lesions. The objective of this study is to retrospectively compare the long term clinical outcomes of ACL hamstring tendon autograft reconstruction with and without concomitant cartilage injuries.

Materials and Methods Forty nine patients (34 men and 15 women) underwent single bundle transtibial ACL reconstruction and were divided in two groups (Group 1: 24 patients with chondral lesions grade III and IV of the ICRS, and Group 2: 25 patients without chondral lesions). Mean age of both groups was 32 and 28 years, respectively. Clinical outcome was evaluated with Lysholm test, IKDC and return to previous level of sport activities. Mean values of of funcional outcome scores between both groups were compared with Mann-Whitney test. Return to previous level of activity in both groups was analyzed with Chi-2 test. The statistical analysis was performed with Stata IC 13.

Results The mean follow-up period was 106.8 months (range: 86–125). Mean Lysholm test for group 1 vs group 2 was 84.87 and 94.52 (p < 0.001), mean IKDC was 84.43 and 92.08 (p < 0.001), and return to previous sports was 70.8% vs 88% (p = 0.136) for each group.

Conclusion Long term clinical outcomes in patients with chondral lesions that underwent ACL reconstruction were significantly lower than patient with isolated ACL injuries. No statistical differences were found in the return to previous sport activities. Level of evidence: IV.

 
  • Bibliografía

  • 1 Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (10) 2321-2328
  • 2 Oiestad BE, Holm I, Aune AK. , et al. Knee function and prevalence of knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study with 10 to 15 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (11) 2201-2210
  • 3 Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Bullock MI, Keays AC. Factors involved in the development of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (03) 455-463
  • 4 Kowalchuk DA, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ. Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (05) 457-463
  • 5 Borchers JR, Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Wright RW. ; MOON Consortium and the MARS Group. Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (09) 1889-1893
  • 6 Brophy RH, Zeltser D, Wright RW, Flanigan D. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and concomitant articular cartilage injury: incidence and treatment. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (01) 112-120
  • 7 Bowers AL, Spindler KP, McCarty EC, Arrigain S. Height, weight, and BMI predict intra-articular injuries observed during ACL reconstruction: evaluation of 456 cases from a prospective ACL database. Clin J Sport Med 2005; 15 (01) 9-13
  • 8 Joseph C, Pathak SS, Aravinda M, Rajan D. Is ACL reconstruction only for athletes? A study of the incidence of meniscal and cartilage injuries in an ACL-deficient athlete and non-athlete population: an Indian experience. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (01) 57-61
  • 9 Kluczynski MA, Marzo JM, Bisson LJ. Factors associated with meniscal tears and chondral lesions in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (12) 2759-2765
  • 10 Gudas R, Gudaitė A, Mickevičius T. , et al. Comparison of osteochondral autologous transplantation, microfracture, or debridement techniques in articular cartilage lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study with a 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (01) 89-97
  • 11 Cox CL, Huston LJ, Dunn WR. , et al. Are articular cartilage lesions and meniscus tears predictive of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A 6-year multicenter cohort study. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (05) 1058-1067
  • 12 Spindler KP, Warren TA, Callison Jr JC, Secic M, Fleisch SB, Wright RW. Clinical outcome at a minimum of five years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (08) 1673-1679
  • 13 Lebel B, Hulet C, Galaud B, Burdin G, Locker B, Vielpeau C. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (07) 1275-1282
  • 14 Hanypsiak BT, Spindler KP, Rothrock CR. , et al. Twelve-year follow-up on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term outcomes of prospectively studied osseous and articular injuries. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (04) 671-677
  • 15 Brambilla L, Pulici L, Carimati G. , et al. Prevalence of Associated Lesions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Correlation With Surgical Timing and With Patient Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (12) 2966-2973
  • 16 Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Five- to fifteen-year evaluations. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (04) 446-452
  • 17 Feller J, Webster KE. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (02) 285-290
  • 18 Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45 (07) 596-606
  • 19 Takeda T, Matsumoto H. fujikawa K. Influence of secondary damage to menisci and articular cartilage on return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci 1997; 2 (04) 215-221