Subscribe to RSS
An Algorithm for Sellar Reconstruction Following the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach: A Review of 300 Consecutive Cases
11 March 2017
15 July 2017
28 August 2017 (online)
Objectives/Hypotheses The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is the workhorse endoscopic procedure for sellar and parasellar pathology. Various reconstruction techniques have been reported following EEA surgery, ranging from no reconstruction to vascularized flaps. We review our institution's experience with sellar reconstruction following EEA and propose an evidence-based algorithm.
Design Retrospective review.
Setting Tertiary academic medical center.
Participants Patients who underwent endoscopic EEA surgery for sellar or parasellar pathology between March 1, 2013 and August 31, 2016.
Main Outcome Measures Patient demographic and clinicopathologic data were collected. Outcome measures included intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rates and extent of resection (gross or subtotal).
Results Three hundred consecutive patients were included. Depending on the presence and grade of intraoperative CSF leak, cases were reconstructed using either a free mucosal graft (FMG) or nasoseptal flap (NSF). Intraoperative and postoperative CSF leak rates were 30.7% and 2.3%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression found that intraoperative CSF leak was associated with recurrent disease (odds ratio [OR] 2.47, p = 0.004), with no apparent predictors of postoperative CSF leak.
Conclusions Based on this large series, we propose the following algorithm for sellar reconstruction: FMG for no CSF leak; fat graft + FMG ± rigid fixation for low-grade leaks; and fat graft + NSF ± rigid fixation for high-grade leaks.
Keywordspituitary surgery - cerebrospinal fluid leak - transsphenoidal - sellar reconstruction - nasoseptal flap - mucosal graft
This study was presented at the North American Skull Base Society 26th Annual Meeting, March 4, 2017, in New Orleans, Louisiana.
- 1 Patel MR, Stadler ME, Snyderman CH. , et al. How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations. Skull Base 2010; 20 (06) 397-404
- 2 Esposito F, Dusick JR, Fatemi N, Kelly DF. Graded repair of cranial base defects and cerebrospinal fluid leaks in transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (04) (Suppl. 02) 295-303 , discussion 303–304
- 3 Kuan EC, Yoo F, Chyu J, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Treatment outcomes of Rathke's cleft cysts managed with marsupialization. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78 (02) 112-115
- 4 Yoo F, Kuan EC, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Free mucosal graft reconstruction of the septum after nasoseptal flap harvest: a novel technique using a posterior septal free mucosal graft. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78 (02) 201-206
- 5 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
- 6 Rivera-Serrano CM, Snyderman CH, Gardner P. , et al. Nasoseptal “rescue” flap: a novel modification of the nasoseptal flap technique for pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (05) 990-993
- 7 Kim BY, Shin JH, Kang SG. , et al. Bilateral modified nasoseptal “rescue” flaps in the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (11) 2605-2609
- 8 Horridge M, Jesurasa A, Olubajo F, Mirza S, Sinha S. The use of the nasoseptal flap to reduce the rate of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leaks following endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery for pituitary disease. Br J Neurosurg 2013; 27 (06) 739-741
- 9 Thorp BD, Sreenath SB, Ebert CS, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (04) E4
- 10 Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL. , et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (01) (Suppl. 01) ONS44-ONS52 , discussion ONS52–ONS53
- 11 Soudry E, Psaltis AJ, Lee KH, Vaezafshar R, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Complications associated with the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (01) 80-85
- 12 Zeinalizadeh M, Sadrehosseini SM, Barkhoudarian G, Carrau RL. Reconstruction of the denuded nasoseptal flap donor site with a free fascia lata graft: technical note. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (10) 3179-3182
- 13 Kimple AJ, Leight WD, Wheless SA, Zanation AM. Reducing nasal morbidity after skull base reconstruction with the nasoseptal flap: free middle turbinate mucosal grafts. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (09) 1920-1924
- 14 Kasemsiri P, Carrau RL, Otto BA. , et al. Reconstruction of the pedicled nasoseptal flap donor site with a contralateral reverse rotation flap: technical modifications and outcomes. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (11) 2601-2604
- 15 Thompson CF, Suh JD, Liu Y, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Modifications to the endoscopic approach for anterior skull base lesions improve postoperative sinonasal symptoms. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (01) 65-72
- 16 Citardi MJ, Cox III AJ, Bucholz RD. Acellular dermal allograft for sellar reconstruction after transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. Am J Rhinol 2000; 14 (01) 69-73
- 17 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Mariniello G, de Divitiis O, Romero AD, de Divitiis E. Easy sellar reconstruction in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery with polyester-silicone dural substitute and fibrin glue: technical note. Neurosurgery 2001; 49 (02) 473-475 , discussion 475–476
- 18 Kelly DF, Oskouian RJ, Fineman I. Collagen sponge repair of small cerebrospinal fluid leaks obviates tissue grafts and cerebrospinal fluid diversion after pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery 2001; 49 (04) 885-889 , discussion 889–890
- 19 Tabaee A, Kamat A, Shrivastava R. Complex reconstruction of the sella using absorbable mini-plate in revision endoscopic pituitary surgery: technical note. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74 (05) 313-317
- 20 Roxbury CR, Saavedra T, Ramanathan Jr M. , et al. Layered sellar reconstruction with avascular free grafts: acceptable alternative to the nasoseptal flap for repair of low-volume intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016; 30 (05) 367-371
- 21 Soudry E, Turner JH, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Endoscopic reconstruction of surgically created skull base defects: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 150 (05) 730-738
- 22 Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (02) 452-459
- 23 Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. , et al. Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009; 23 (05) 518-521
- 24 Juraschka K, Khan OH, Godoy BL. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to large and giant pituitary adenomas: institutional experience and predictors of extent of resection. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (01) 75-83
- 25 Woodworth GF, Patel KS, Shin B. , et al. Surgical outcomes using a medial-to-lateral endonasal endoscopic approach to pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (05) 1086-1094
- 26 Tajudeen BA, Mundi J, Suh JD, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for recurrent pituitary tumors: technical challenges to the surgical approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (01) 50-56
- 27 Sanders-Taylor C, Anaizi A, Kosty J, Zimmer LA, Theodosopoulos PV. Sellar reconstruction and rates of delayed cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic pituitary surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (04) 281-285
- 28 Patel MR, Taylor RJ, Hackman TG. , et al. Beyond the nasoseptal flap: outcomes and pearls with secondary flaps in endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (04) 846-852
- 29 Jalessi M, Sharifi G, Mirfallah Layalestani MR. , et al. Sellar reconstruction algorithm in endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: experience with 240 cases. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2013; 27 (04) 186-194