Impact of the Regional Pediatric Palliative Care Network on the Care of Children on Long-Term Ventilation: Could the Availability of a Residential Solution into the Network Reduce the Duration of Intensive Care Unit Staying for These Patients?Funding None.
08 January 2017
08 July 2017
11 August 2017 (eFirst)
The prevalence of children on long-term ventilation (LTV) at home has increased in many countries. In Italy, there are 4.3/100,000 population younger than 18 years. Pediatric palliative care (PPC) network provides high-level care for these patients. In December 2003, in the northeast region of Italy, the regional authority promoted and developed a regional network for PPC, a regional network dedicated to the management of pediatric patients with life-limiting and life-threatening diseases. Characterization of LTV children population and description of care offered to them by a regional PPC network, based on the experience of the Veneto region were collected in a regional database. The regional database and evaluation of families' satisfaction, by means of a questionnaire, were longitudinally analyzed. We studied 56 children on LTV. The main involved diseases were neuromuscular diseases and myopathy. All patients had major comorbidities. Mean age was 4.5 years. The median age of starting ventilation was 3.9 years. The initial type of ventilation was invasive mechanical ventilation in 31 patients and noninvasive ventilation in 25 of them. The overall average frequency of hospitalizations for acute episodes was 0.7 admissions per year and the median duration of staying was 6 days. The median duration of staying in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly reduced after the opening of a residential solution (the pediatric hospice) (5 vs. 39 days). PPC network can offer global care to children on LTV. The availability of a residential structure into the PPC network seems to reduce the number and duration of hospital stays, especially in ICU, of this population, with likely cost savings. Further studies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.
Keywordslong-term ventilation - mechanical ventilation - Pediatric Palliative Care - life-limiting disease - intensive care
All procedures performed in this study, involving human participants, have been in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study has obtained the approval of the Ethics Committee. Informed consent has been obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study has been performed at the Pediatric Pain and Palliative Care Service, Department of Pediatrics, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 3, 35127 Padua, Italy.
- 1 Goodwin S, Smith H, Langton Hewer S. , et al. Increasing prevalence of domiciliary ventilation: changes in service demand and provision in the South West of the UK. Eur J Pediatr 2011; 170 (09) 1187-1192
- 2 McDougall CM, Adderley RJ, Wensley DF, Seear MD. Long-term ventilation in children: longitudinal trends and outcomes. Arch Dis Child 2013; 98 (09) 660-665
- 3 Com G, Kuo DZ, Bauer ML. , et al. Outcomes of children treated with tracheostomy and positive-pressure ventilation at home. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2013; 52 (01) 54-61
- 4 Racca F, Berta G, Sequi M. , et al; LTV Pediatric Italian Network. Long-term home ventilation of children in Italy: a national survey. Pediatr Pulmonol 2011; 46 (06) 566-572
- 5 Graham RJ. Long-term ventilation: charting a pathway home. Arch Dis Child 2013; 98 (09) 653
- 6 Jardine E, Wallis C. ; UK Working Party on Paediatric Long Term Ventilation. Core guidelines for the discharge home of the child on long-term assisted ventilation in the United Kingdom. Thorax 1998; 53 (09) 762-767
- 7 Ferrante A, Po' C, Del Favero E. , et al. Does a pediatric palliative care network respond to the needs of families? Efficacy of a pediatric palliative network. Pediatr Anesth Crit Care J 2013; 1: 15-26
- 8 Feudtner C, Kang TI, Hexem KR. , et al. Pediatric palliative care patients: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (06) 1094-1101
- 9 Peterson-Carmichael SL, Cheifetz IM. The chronically critically ill patient: pediatric considerations. Respir Care 2012; 57 (06) 993-1002 , discussion 1002–10038
- 10 Amin R, Sayal P, Syed F, Chaves A, Moraes TJ, MacLusky I. Pediatric long-term home mechanical ventilation: twenty years of follow-up from one Canadian center. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014; 49 (08) 816-824
- 11 Wallis C, Paton JY, Beaton S, Jardine E. Children on long-term ventilatory support: 10 years of progress. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96 (11) 998-1002
- 12 Benini F, Ferrante L, Pozza VD, Trapanotto M, Facchin P. Children's needs: key figures from the Veneto region, Italy. Eur J Palliat Care 2008; 15 (06) 299-304
- 13 Gans D, Kominski GF, Roby DH. , et al. Better outcomes, lower costs: palliative care program reduces stress, costs of care for children with life-threatening conditions. Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res 2012; 2012–3 (PB2012-3): 1-8
- 14 Keele L, Keenan HT, Sheetz J, Bratton SL. Differences in characteristics of dying children who receive and do not receive palliative care. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (01) 72-78
- 15 Postier A, Chrastek J, Nugent S, Osenga K, Friedrichsdorf SJ. Exposure to home-based pediatric palliative and hospice care and its impact on hospital and emergency care charges at a single institution. J Palliat Med 2014; 17 (02) 183-188
- 16 Kassam A, Skiadaresis J, Alexander S, Wolfe J. Parent and clinician preferences for location of end-of-life care: home, hospital or freestanding hospice?. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61 (05) 859-864