Download PDF
J Hand Microsurg 2017; 09(02): 113-114
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1605352
Point of Technique
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

A Method to Facilitate “Nonsticking” of Regular Bipolar Forceps

Hui-Kuang Huang
1   Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
2   Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
3   Department of Orthopaedics, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
4   Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Tainan, Taiwan
,
Jung-Pan Wang
1   Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
2   Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 July 2017

05 July 2017

Publication Date:
01 August 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Electrosurgery using a bipolar cautery is very common, especially in surgical fields with surrounding vital structures. However, the tissue tends to stick to the bipolar forceps due to the heat cautery, which makes the tips stick together. When forceps tips are stuck to the cauterized tissue, surgeons have to spend time separating the tips. Also, when surgeons separate the tips, a cauterized bleeder may rebleed. Some bipolar forceps with nonstick coatings have been developed to reduce the sticking problem. However, for some surgeons or institutes, these nonstick bipolar forceps may be unavailable. The authors describe an easy method to reduce the occurrence of sticking forceps tips if regular bipolar forceps are used.

Keywords

bipolar - cautery - electrosurgery - forceps - stick
 

  • References

  • 1 Mittelstein D, Deng J, Kohan R, Sadeghi M, Maarek JM, Zada G. Novel technique of a multifunctional electrosurgical system for minimally invasive surgery. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (03) 997-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Samii A, Dujovny M. Kirwan “non-stick” bipolar forceps. Surg Neurol 1996; 45 (03) 297-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar