Breaking International Barriers: #ColorectalSurgery Is #GlobalSurgery

Julio Mayol; Jaime Otero

doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604257

Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30(04): 277-280
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604257

Review Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Breaking International Barriers: #ColorectalSurgery Is #GlobalSurgery

Julio Mayol

¹Department of Surgery, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

,

Jaime Otero

²Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Colorectal surgeons have lagged behind other professionals in the use of social media. Currently, Twitter is the most widely utilized social platform for professional purposes among them. Connection and contagion are the two key actions that, together with immediate feedback and quantifiable impact, favor the use of Twitter over other social networks. In early 2016, a group of colorectal surgeons launched the #colorectalsurgery hashtag and, in less than 1 year, the ecosystem has incorporated over 2,600 users that generated over 24,000 tweets and 100 million impressions. “Live-Tweeting” surgical conferences by attendees including institutional or society accounts have greatly contributed to the success of the initiative. However, there are some barriers to a more wide adoption of social media, such as misrepresentation of non–peer-reviewed data, challenges to intellectual property protection, or even damage to the professional image. Active engagement with the #colorectalsurgery community may result in benefits for the global surgery community through information sharing, social interactions, personal branding, and research.

Keywords

Twitter - #colorectalsurgery - conference - hashtag - social media - surgery

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 What is Web 2.0. Available at: http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html [Accessed February 19, 2017]
2 Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P&T 2014; 39 (07) 491-520
3 McDonald JJ, Bisset C, Coleman MG, Speake D, Brady RR. Contemporary use of social media by consultant colorectal surgeons. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17 (02) 165-171
4 Surgeons send “tweets” from operating room. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/02/17/twitter.surgery/ [Accessed February 19, 2017]
5 Diariomedico.com retransmite por primera vez una cirugía en Twitter. Available at: http://www.dmedicina.com/enfermedades/2009/01/28/diariomedicocom-retransmite-primera-vez-cirugia-traves-twitter-11190.html [Accessed February 19, 2017]
6 Logghe HJ, Boeck MA, Atallah SB. Decoding Twitter. Understanding the history, instruments, and techniques for success. Ann Surg 2016; 264 (06) 904-908
7 Hall N. The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists. Genome Biol 2014; 15 (07) 424
8 Branford OA, Kamali P, Rohrich RJ. , et al. #PlasticSurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (06) 1354-1365
9 Wexner SD, Petrucci AM, Brady RR, Ennis-O'Connor M, Fitzgerald JE, Mayol J. Social media in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19 (02) 105-114
10 Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 2008; 337: a2338
11 Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Stat Med 2013; 32 (04) 556-577
12 Murthy D. Towards a sociological understanding of social media: theorizing Twitter. Sociology 2012; 46: 1059-1073
13 Ferrara E, Yang Z. Measuring emotional contagion in social media. PLoS One 2015; 10 (11) e0142390
14 Twitter analytics. Available at: https://analytics.twitter.com/ . Accessed February 19, 2017
15 Symplur. Available at: http://www.symplur.com/ . Accessed February 19, 2017
16 Brady R. . Available at: https://twitter.com/researchactive/status/831261685331718144 . Accessed February 19, 2017
17 Chapman SJ, Mayol J, Brady RR. Twitter can enhance the medical conference experience. BMJ 2016; 354: i3973
18 Leow JJ, Pozo ME, Groen RS, Kushner AL. Social media in low-resource settings: a role for Twitter and Facebook in global surgery?. Surgery 2012; 151 (06) 767-769
19 Groves T. Tweeting and rule breaking at conferences. BMJ 2016; 353: i3556
20 Desai T, Dhingra V, Shariff A. , et al. Quantifying the Twitter influence of third party commercial entities versus healthcare providers in thirteen medical conferences from 2011–2013. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0162376
21 Crannell WC, Clark E, Jones C, James TA, Moore J. A pattern-matched Twitter analysis of US cancer-patient sentiments. J Surg Res 2016; 206 (02) 536-542