Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2017; 02(01): e78-e82
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604157
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Patient Satisfaction and Hand Performance Following Fingertip Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Daisuke Kaji
1   Limb Trauma Center, Nara City Hospital, Nara, Japan
,
Shohei Omokawa
2   Department of Hand Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
,
Akito Nakanishi
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Takita Hospital, Nara, Japan
,
Kenji Kawamura
4   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
,
Takamasa Shimizu
4   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
,
Yasuhito Tanaka
4   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

31 December 2016

25 May 2017

Publication Date:
06 July 2017 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Hand performance tests that evaluate hand dexterity and use in daily living have been frequently used to evaluate outcomes in patients with various hand disorders but not in patients with fingertip injuries. The present study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and hand performance following digital artery flap reconstruction for fingertip injury and identify factors associated with these outcomes.

Methods This retrospective cohort study included 25 patients with amputation injuries at our institution between 2003 and 2013. Patients with amputations at the Tamai 1 or 2 zone of their index (14 patients) or middle finger (11 patients) who underwent digital artery flap surgery and were followed up for > 1 year were included. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at an average of 44 months postoperatively (range, 12–105 months). The primary outcomes were patient satisfaction and hand performance determined by a 4-grade Likert scale and the Purdue Pegboard test, respectively. Secondary outcomes were recovery of sensitivity measured by Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments, total active finger motion (TAM), and tip pinch strength.

Results There were no postoperative complications. Patient satisfaction was rated as fair, good, and excellent, in 1, 15, and 9 patients, respectively. The average hand performance test scores were significantly lower in the affected finger than the adjacent finger (22 vs. 30, respectively; p < 0.05). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) sensitivity test score was 3.5 ± 1.6 (range, 2.4–4.0). The average percentage TAM and tip pinch strength compared with the contralateral hand were 82 (range, 45–100%) and 82% (range, 60–112%), respectively. The hand performance score significantly correlated with the recovery of sensitivity and age (r = – 0.42 and 0.43, respectively; both p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was significantly correlated with TAM (r = 0.42, p < 0.05) and tended to correlate with the recovery of sensitivity (r = – 0.395, p = 0.051).

Conclusion Although reconstructed fingers had a lower performance score than the adjacent fingers, patient satisfaction with flap surgery was relatively high. Recovery of finger sensitivity contributed to patient satisfaction and enhanced dexterity of motor skill activities following fingertip reconstruction.

Keywords

performance - fingertip - reconstruction
 

  • References

  • 1 Sears ED, Chung KC. Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor hand function test. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (01) 30-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Amirjani N, Ashworth NL, Olson JL, Morhart M, Chan KM. Validity and reliability of the Purdue Pegboard test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2011; 43 (02) 171-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Draviaraj KP, Chakrabarti I. Functional outcome after surgery for Dupuytren's contracture: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29 (05) 804-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bogoch ER, Escott BG, Ronald K. Hand appearance as a patient motivation for surgery and a determinant of satisfaction with metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (06) 1007-1014.e1–4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kotkansalo T, Vilkki SK, Elo P. The functional results of post-traumatic metacarpal hand reconstruction with microvascular toe transfers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (06) 730-742
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chen HY, Hsu CC, Lin YT, Yeh JT, Lin CH, Lin CH. Functional and aesthetic outcomes of the fingertips after nail lengthening using the eponychial flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (10) 1438-1446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kojima T, Tsuchida Y, Hirasé Y, Endo T. Reverse vascular pedicle digital island flap. Br J Plast Surg 1990; 43 (03) 290-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Venkataswami R, Subramanian N. Oblique triangular flap: a new method of repair for oblique amputations of the fingertip and thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (02) 296-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Littler JW. The neurovascular pedicle method of digital transposition for reconstruction of the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1953; 12 (05) 303-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Koshima I, Urushibara K, Fukuda N. , et al. Digital artery perforator flaps for fingertip reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (07) 1579-1584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Giladi AM, McGlinn EP, Shauver MJ, Voice TP, Chung KC. Measuring outcomes and determining long-term disability after revision amputation for treatment of traumatic finger and thumb amputation injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (05) 746e-755e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shahar RB, Kizony R, Nota A. Validity of the Purdue Pegboard test in assessing patients after traumatic hand injury. Work 1998; 11 (03) 315-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness of tests. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30 (03) 252-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jazayeri L, Klausner JQ, Chang J. Distal digital replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (05) 1207-1217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Walaszek I, Zyluk A. Long term follow-up after finger replantation. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33 (01) 59-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Usami S, Kawahara S, Yamaguchi Y, Hirase T. Homodigital artery flap reconstruction for fingertip amputation: a comparative study of the oblique triangular neurovascular advancement flap and the reverse digital artery island flap. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (03) 291-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yan H, Gao W, Zhang F, Li Z, Chen X, Fan C. A comparative study of finger pulp reconstruction using arterialised venous sensate flap and insensate flap from forearm. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (09) 1220-1226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Martin JA, Ramsay J, Hughes C, Peters DM, Edwards MG. Age and grip strength predict hand dexterity in adults. PLoS One 2015; 10 (02) e0117598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Doherty TJ, Brown WF. Age-related changes in the twitch contractile properties of human thenar motor units. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1997; 82 (01) 93-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Doherty TJ, Vandervoort AA, Taylor AW, Brown WF. Effects of motor unit losses on strength in older men and women. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1993; 74 (02) 868-874
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bouche P, Cattelin F, Saint-Jean O. , et al. Clinical and electrophysiological study of the peripheral nervous system in the elderly. J Neurol 1993; 240 (05) 263-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Norris AH, Shock NW, Wagman IH. Age changes in the maximum conduction velocity of motor fibers of human ulnar nerves. J Appl Physiol 1953; 5 (10) 589-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Carmeli E, Patish H, Coleman R. The aging hand. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58 (02) 146-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar