PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39(07): 317-321
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603939
Original Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Qualitative Determination of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin in Vaginal Washings for the Early Diagnosis of Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes

Determinação qualitativa de gonadotrofina coriônica humana no lavado vaginal para o diagnóstico precoce de ruptura prematura de membranas fetais
Camila Buziquia Dartibale
1   Department of Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, PR, Brazil
,
Nelson Shozo Uchimura
1   Department of Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, PR, Brazil
,
Luiz Nery
1   Department of Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, PR, Brazil
,
Angelita Polato Schumeish
2   Laboratory Division, Hospital Universitário Regional de Maringá, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, PR, Brazil
,
Liza Yurie Teruya Uchimura
3   Departament of Preventive Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (DMP/FMUSP), São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Rosangela Getirana Santana
4   Departament of Statistics, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, PR, Brazil
,
Taqueco Teruya Uchimura
4   Departament of Statistics, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, PR, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

03. November 2016

04. April 2017

Publikationsdatum:
16. Juni 2017 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate and validate the qualitative human chorionic gonadotropin β subunit (β-hCG) test of the vaginal fluid washings of pregnant women with premature rupture of fetal membranes (PROM).

Methods Cross-sectional study of pregnant women between gestational weeks 24 and 39 who underwent consultations in one of our institutions. They were divided into two groups: group A (pregnant women clinically diagnosed with PROM) and group B (pregnant women without loss of amniotic liquid). The patients were subjected to a vaginal fluid washing with 3 mL of saline solution, which was aspirated subsequently with the same syringe. The solution was immediately sent to the laboratory to perform the vaginal β-hCG test with cut-off points of 10 mIU/mL (β-hCG-10) and/or 25 mIU/mL (β-hCG-25).

Results The β-hCG-10 test of the vaginal secretion was performed in 128 cases. The chi-squared test with Yates' correction showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.0225). The sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy parameters were 77.1%, 43.6%, 52.3%; 70.4%; and 58.6% respectively. The β-hCG-25 test of the vaginal washing was performed in 49 cases. The analysis by Fisher's exact test showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0175). The sensibility, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy parameters were 44.4%, 87.1%, 66.6%; 72.9%; and 71.4% respectively.

Conclusions The β-hCG-25 test showed better accuracy for the diagnosis of PROM, and can corroborate the early diagnosis of PROM because it is a simple and quick exam.

Resumo

Objetivo Este estudo objetivou validar o exame qualitativo da subunidade β da gonadotrofina coriônica humana (β-hCG) em lavado vaginal de gestantes com ruptura prematura de membranas (RPM) fetais.

Métodos Estudo transversal de gestantes com 24 a 39 semanas atendidas em um hospital de Maringá divididas em 2 grupos: grupo A (clinicamente diagnosticadas com RPM) e grupo B (gestantes sem perda de liquido amniótico). As pacientes foram submetidas a lavado vaginal com 3 mL de soro fisiológico, que logo em seguida foi aspirado de volta na mesma seringa e imediatamente enviado ao laboratório para a realização do exame de β-hCG vaginal com pontos de corte de 10 mIU/mL (β-hCG-10) e/ou 25 mIU/mL (β-hCG-25).

Resultados O teste de β-hCG-10 na secreção vaginal foi realizado em 128 casos, e o teste do qui-quadrado com correção de Yates mostrou diferença significante entre os dois grupos (p = 0,0225). Os parâmetros de sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo (VPP), valor preditivo negativo (VPN) e acurácia foram respectivamente 77,1%; 43,6%; 52,3%; 70,4%; e 58,6%. O teste de β-hCG-25 na secreção vaginal foi realizado em 49 casos, e a análise pelo teste exato de Fisher mostrou diferença significativa entre os grupos (p = 0,0175). Os parâmetros de sensibilidade, especificidade, VPP, VPN e acurácia foram respectivamente 44,4%; 87,1%; 66,6%; 72,9%; e 71,4%.

Conclusões O β-hCG-25 apresentou melhor acurácia para o diagnóstico de RPM, e pode corroborar o diagnóstico precoce de RPM por se tratar de um exame simples e rápido.

Keywords

human chorionic gonadotropin - β subunit - premature rupture of fetal membranes - diagnosis - obstetrics - pregnancy complications

Palavras-chave

gonadotrofina coriônica humana - subunidade β - ruptura prematura de membranas fetais - diagnóstico - obstetrícia - complicações na gravidez
 

  • References

  • 1 Kariman N, Hedayati M, Taheri Z, Fallahian M, Salehpoor S, Alavi Majd SH. Comparison of ELISA and three rapid HCG dipsticks in diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2011; 13 (06) 415-419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tigga M, Malik S. Various biomarkers in diagnosing premature rupture of membranes: a cost effective analysis. Internet J Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 19 (01) 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Caughey AB, Robinson JN, Norwitz ER. Contemporary diagnosis and management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2008; 1 (01) 11-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Temel O, Cöğendez E, Selçuk S, Asoğlu MR, Kaya E. β-human chorionic gonadotropin assay in vaginal washing fluid for the accurate diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes during late pregnancy. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2013; 14 (04) 201-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 El-Messidi A, Cameron A. Diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes: inspiration from the past and insights for the future. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32 (06) 561-569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Eskicioglu F, Gur EB. Diagnostic modalities in premature rupture of membranes. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci. 2015; 3 (02) 89-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Marcellin L, Goffinet F. Are biological markers relevant for the diagnosis and the prognosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50 (06) 1015-1019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Movahed F, Elmizadeh K, Javadi A, Choopani A. The value of qualitative detection of human chorionic gonadotropin in vaginal washing fluid for diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Pak J Med Sci 2012; 28 (05) 900-903
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cooper AL, Vermillion ST, Soper DE. Qualitative human chorionicgonadotropin testing of cervicovaginal washings for the detection of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (02) 593-596 , discussion 596–597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Esim E, Turan C, Unal O, Dansuk R, Cengizglu B. Diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes by identification of beta-HCG in vaginal washing fluid. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 107 (01) 37-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Anai T, Tanaka Y, Hirota Y, Miyakawa I. Vaginal fluid hCG levels for detecting premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89 (02) 261-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Carranza Lira S, Negrete López M, Quinzaños Fresnedo C, Leaños Miranda A. [Usefulness of the qualitative detection of hCG in cervicovaginal lavage for the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes]. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2009; 77 (03) 142-146 Spanish
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tigga MP, Malik S. Comparative analysis of four biomarkers in diagnosing premature rupture of membranes and their correlation with onset of labour. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2015; 4 (04) 1070-1075
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bahasadri S, Kashanian M, Khalili S. Evaluation of vaginal fluid β-human chorionic gonadotrophin for the diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39 (04) 777-782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mohamed RS, Rashed RM, Hassanein RA, Oun AR, Abdel-Maksoud SM. Vaginal fluid creatinine versus human chorionic gonadotropin for diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes. J Am Sci 2015; 11 (01) 33-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kim YH, Park YW, Kwon HS, Kwon JY, Kim BJ. Vaginal fluid beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level in the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84 (08) 802-805
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 El-Razik MA, Hegazy AE, El-Haseeb MA, Tawfeek M. Cervico-vaginal fluid β-subunit human chorionic gonadotrophin for diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Med J Cairo Univ 2010; 78 (01) 491-494
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Osman OM, Elghazaly M. Can Vaginal Washing Fluid Urea, Creatinine and Qualitative β-hCG Diagnose Suspected Premature Rupture of Membranes?. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 4: 967-972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar