Download PDF
Semin Hear 2017; 38(03): 225-262
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603726
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Occupational Hearing Loss from Non-Gaussian Noise

Alice H. Suter
1   Alice Suter and Associates, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 July 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Noise levels are truly continuous in relatively few occupations, with some degree of intermittency the most common condition. The sound levels of intermittent noise are often referred to as non-Gaussian in that they are not normally distributed in the time domain. In some conditions, intermittent noise affects the ear differently from continuous noise, and it is this assumption that underlies the selection of the 5-dB exchange rate (ER). The scientific and professional communities have debated this assumption over recent decades. This monograph explores the effect of non-Gaussian noise on the auditory system. It begins by summarizing an earlier report by the same author concentrating on the subject of the ER. The conclusions of the earlier report supported the more conservative 3-dB ER with possible adjustments to the permissible exposure limit for certain working conditions. The current document has expanded on the earlier report in light of the relevant research accomplished in the intervening decades. Although some of the animal research has supported the mitigating effect of intermittency, a closer look at many of these studies reveals certain weaknesses, along with the fact that these noise exposures were not usually representative of the conditions under which people actually work. The more recent animal research on complex noise shows that intermittencies do not protect the cochlea and that many of the previous assumptions about the ameliorative effect of intermittencies are no longer valid, lending further support to the 3-dB ER. The neurologic effects of noise on hearing have gained increasing attention in recent years because of improvements in microscopy and immunostaining techniques. Animal experiments showing damage to auditory synapses from noise exposures previously considered harmless may signify the need for a more conservative approach to the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss and consequently the practice of hearing conservation programs.

Keywords

Noise - non-Gaussian noise - hearing loss - occupational hearing loss
 

  • References

  • 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Noise in America: The Extent of the Noise Problem. Washington, DC: Office of Noise Abatement and Control; 1981. EPA Report 550/9-81-101
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Suter AH. The Relationship of the Exchange Rate to Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Standards Development and Technology Transfer; 1992. NTIS No. PB-93–118610
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Passchier-Vermeer W. Noise induced hearing loss from exposure to intermittent and varying noise. In: Ward WD, ed. Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May 13–18, 1973. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1973. EPA Report 550/9-73-008; pages 169–200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kryter KD, Ward WD, Miller JD, Eldredge DH. Hazardous exposure to intermittent and steady-state noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1966; 39 (03) 451-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. Washington, DC: Office of Noise Abatement and Control; 1974. Report 550/9-74-004
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Flamme G, Murphy WJ. Brief high-level sounds. In: Meinke DK, Berger EH. , eds. The Noise Manual, 6th ed. ( in press ). Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association Press;
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Hamernik RP, Hsueh KD. Impulse noise: some definitions, physical acoustics and other considerations. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (01) 189-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Henderson D, Hamernik RP. Impulse noise: critical review. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 80 (02) 569-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ahroon WA, Hamernik RP, Davis RI. Complex noise exposures: an energy analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93 (02) 997-1006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lei SF, Ahroon WA, Hamernik RP. The application of frequency and time domain kurtosis to the assessment of hazardous noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96 (03) 1435-1444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hamernik RP, Qiu W. Energy-independent factors influencing noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla model. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110 (06) 3163-3168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics—Assessment of Occupational Noise Exposure for Hearing Conservation Purposes. 1st ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1971. (E). Reference No. ISO/R 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 13 International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics–Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment. Draft ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1982. ISO DIS 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Glorig A, Ward WD, Nixon J. Damage risk criteria and noise-induced hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol 1961; 74: 413-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Noise Exposure. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Standards; 1969. 34 Fed. Reg. 7948–7949
    Google Scholar
  • 16 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Public Health and Welfare Criteria for Noise. Washington, DC: Office of Noise Abatement and Control; 1973. Report 550/9-73-002
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Department of the Air Force. Hazardous Noise Exposure. Washington, DC: Medical Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 1956. Air Force Regulation 160-3
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Department of the Air Force. Hazardous Noise Exposure. Washington, DC: Aerospace Medicine; 1973. Air Force Regulation 161-35
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Department of the Air Force. Hazardous Noise Program. Washington, DC: Aerospace Medicine; 1993. Air Force Occupational Safety and Health Standard 48-19
    Google Scholar
  • 20 International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics—Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1990. (E). Reference No. ISO 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 21 International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics—Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2013. ISO/TC 43-Acoustics, 2013-10-01
    Google Scholar
  • 22 American National Standards Institute/Acoustical Society of America (ANSI/ASA). Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment. New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America; 1996. ANSI/ASA S3.44
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Hétu R. Temporary threshold shift and the time pattern of noise exposure. Can Acoust 1982; 10 (04) 36-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Harding GW, Bohne BA. Noise-induced hair-cell loss and total exposure energy: analysis of a large data set. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115 (5 Pt 1): 2207-2220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Holmgren G, Johnsson L, Kylin B, Linde O. Noise and hearing of a population of forest workers. In: Robinson DW, ed. Occupational Hearing Loss: Proceedings of a conference held at the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England, March 23–25, 1970. London: Academic Press; 1971. British Acoustical Society Special Volume Number 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Johansson B, Kylin B, Reopstorff S. Evaluation of the hearing damage risk from intermittent noise according to the ISO recommendations. In: Ward WD, ed. Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May 13–18, 1973. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1973. EPA Report 550/9-73-008; pages 201–210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ward WD. The role of intermittence in PTS. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (01) 164-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ward WD, Nelson DA. On the equal-energy hypothesis relative to damage-risk criteria in the chinchilla. In: Robinson DW, ed. Occupational Hearing Loss: Proceedings of a conference held at the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England, March 23–25, 1970. London: Academic Press; 1971. British Acoustical Society Special Volume Number 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ward WD, Turner CW. The total energy concept as a unifying approach to the prediction of noise trauma and its application to exposure criteria. In: Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi R. , eds. New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1982
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Ward WD, Turner CW, Fabry DA. The total-energy and equal-energy principles in the chinchilla. Poster contribution to the Fourth International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem; June 1983; Turin, Italy
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bohne BA, Zahn SJ, Bozzay DG. Damage to the cochlea following interrupted exposure to low frequency noise. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94 (2 Pt 1): 122-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bohne BA, Pearse MS. Cochlear damage from daily exposure to low-frequency noise. Unpublished manuscript. St. Louis, MO: Washington University Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology; 1982
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Burns W, Robinson DW. Hearing and Noise in Industry. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1970
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Robinson DW, Shipton MS. Tables for the Estimations of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Teddington, England: National Physical Laboratory, Department of Trade and Industry; 1973. NPL Acoustics Report AC 61
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Evans WA, Ming HY. Industrial noise-induced hearing loss in Hong Kong—a comparative study. Ann Occup Hyg 1982; 25 (01) 63-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Institut National de Recherche et de Securite (INRS). Etude des risques auditifs auxquels sont soumis les salaries agricoles en exploitations forestieres et en scieries. INRS: Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France; 1978. Compte rendu d'etude No. 325 B
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ward WD. The “safe” workday noise dose. In: Proceedings from the Noise Shock & Vibration Conference. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University; 1974: 19-27
    Google Scholar
  • 38 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Survey of Hearing Loss in the Coal Mining Industry. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control; 1976. Publication Number 76-172
    Google Scholar
  • 39 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Health Hazard Evaluation Report: Newburgh Fire Department, Newburgh, NY. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control; 1982. HETA 81-059-1045
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Passchier-Vermeer W. Steady-state and fluctuating noise: its effect on the hearing of people. In: Robinson DW, ed. Occupational Hearing Loss: Proceedings of a conference held at the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England, March 23–25, 1970. London: Academic Press; 1971. British Acoustical Society Special Volume Number 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Shaw EAG. Occupational Noise Exposure and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Scientific Issues, Technical Arguments and Practical Recommendations. Report prepared for the Special Advisory Committee on the Ontario Noise Regulation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: National Research Council; 1985. APS 707; NRCC/CNRC Number 25051
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Clark WW, Bohne BA, Boettcher FA. Effect of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82 (04) 1253-1264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sinex DG, Clark WW, Bohne BA. Effects of periodic rest on physiological measures of auditory sensitivity following exposure to noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82 (04) 1265-1273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Fredelius L, Wersäll J. Hair cell damage after continuous and interrupted pure tone overstimulation: a scanning electron microscopic study in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1992; 62 (02) 194-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Pourbakht A, Yamasoba T. Cochlear damage caused by continuous and intermittent noise exposure. Hear Res 2003; 178 (1–2): 70-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Patuzzi R. Exponential onset and recovery of temporary threshold shift after loud sound: evidence for long-term inactivation of mechano-electrical transduction channels. Hear Res 1998; 125 (1–2): 17-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Lataye R, Campo P. Applicability of the L(eq) as a damage-risk criterion: an animal experiment. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99 (03) 1621-1632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Bohne BA, Yohman L, Gruner MM. Cochlear damage following interrupted exposure to high-frequency noise. Hear Res 1987; 29 (2–3): 251-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Bohne BA, Harding GW. Degeneration in the cochlea after noise damage: primary versus secondary events. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (04) 505-509
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Subramaniam M, Henderson D, Spongr V. Effect of low-frequency “conditioning” on hearing loss from high-frequency exposure. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93 (02) 952-956
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Boettcher FA, Spongr VP, Salvi RJ. Physiological and histological changes associated with the reduction in threshold shift during interrupted noise exposure. Hear Res 1992; 62 (02) 217-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA. Interrupted noise exposures: threshold shift dynamics and permanent effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103 (06) 3478-3488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA. Sound-induced priming of the chinchilla auditory system. Hear Res 1999; 137 (1–2): 127-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Ahroon WA, Hamernik RP. Noise-induced hearing loss in the noise-toughened auditory system. Hear Res 1999; 129 (1–2): 101-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Qiu W, Davis B, Hamernik RP. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying Gaussian noise exposures: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121 (03) 1613-1620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Ward WD. Temporary threshold shift and damage-risk criteria for intermittent noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48 (02) 561-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Luz GA, Hodge DC. Recovery from impulse-noise induced TTS in monkeys and men: a descriptive model. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49 (06) 1770-1777
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Henderson D, Hamernik RP, Sitler RW. Audiometric and histological correlates of exposure to 1-msec noise impulses in the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56 (04) 1210-1221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Henderson D, Subramaniam M, Gratton MA, Saunders SS. Impact noise: the importance of level, duration, and repetition rate. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89 (03) 1350-1357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Henderson D, Spongr V, Subramaniam M, Campo P. Anatomical effects of impact noise. Hear Res 1994; 76 (1–2): 101-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Dancer A, Grateau P, Cabanis A, Vaillant T, Lafont D. Delayed temporary threshold shift induced by impulse noises (weapon noises) in men. Audiology 1991; 30 (06) 345-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Trahiotis C. Application of animal data to the development of noise standards. In: Henderson D, Hamernik RP, Dosanjh DS. , and Mills JH. , eds. Effects of Noise on Hearing. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Eldredge DH, Miller JD, Mills JH, Bohne BA. Behavioral, physiological and anatomical studies of threshold shifts in animals. In: Ward WD, ed. Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, May 13–18, 1973; Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1973. EPA Report 550/9–73–008; pages 237–256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Mills JH, Gengel RW, Watson CS, Miller JD. Temporary changes of the auditory system due to exposure to noise for one or two days. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48 (02) 524-530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Mills JH, Osguthorpe JD, Burdick CK, Patterson JH, Mozo B. Temporary threshold shifts produced by exposure to low-frequency noises. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73 (03) 918-923
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Occupational Noise Exposure. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Office of the Register. CFR; 1910. .95
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Ward WD. , ed. Proposed Damage-Risk Criteria for Impulse Noise (Gunfire). Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences-National Research Council: Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics; 1968. Report of working group 57
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Occupational Noise Exposure: Proposed Requirements and Procedures. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor; 1974. 39 Fed. Reg. 37773–37778
    Google Scholar
  • 69 U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). Design Criteria Standard—Noise limits. Washington, DC: Department of Defense; 1997. MIL-STD-1474D
    Google Scholar
  • 70 U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). Design Criteria Standard—Noise limits. Washington, DC: Department of Defense; 2015. MIL-STD-1474E
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Price GR, Kalb JT. Insights into hazard from intense impulses from a mathematical model of the ear. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (01) 219-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Price GR. Predicting mechanical damage to the organ of Corti. Hear Res 2007; 226 (1–2): 5-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Price GR. Validation of the auditory hazard assessment algorithm for the human with impulse noise data. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122 (05) 2786-2802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Direction Technique des Armements Terrestres (DTAT). Recommendations on Evaluating the Possible Harmful Effects of Noise on Hearing. Bourges, France: Establissement Technique de Bourges; 1983. AT-83/27/28
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Dancer A. LAeq 8hr: An effective DRC for weapon noises. Paper presented at: NIOSH/NHCA Best Practices Workshop on Impulsive Noise and Its Effects on Hearing; April 7–8, 2003; Cincinnati, OH
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Hamernik RP, Patterson JH, Ahroon WA. Use of Animal Test Data in the Development of a Human Auditory Hazard Criterion for Impulse Noise. New York, NY: Auditory Research Laboratory, State University of New York; 1998. Final Report Part 1 and Part 2, submitted to Jaycor under subcontract agreement 950342
    Google Scholar
  • 77 Murphy W, Kardous C. A Case for Using A-Weighted Equivalent Energy as a Damage Risk Criterion. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2012. EPHB Report No. 350–11a
    Google Scholar
  • 78 Murphy W, Kahn A, Shaw P. An Analysis of the Blast Overpressure Study Data Comparing Three Exposure Criteria. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2009. Report No. EPHB 309-05h
    Google Scholar
  • 79 Murphy W, Kahn A, Shaw P. Analysis of Chinchilla Temporary and Permanent Threshold Shifts following Impulsive Noise Exposure. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2010. Report No. EPHB 338-05c
    Google Scholar
  • 80 Johnson DL. Blast Overpressure Studies with Animals and Man: A Walk-up Study. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratories; 1993. Final task report for U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. Technical report USAARL CR DAMD17–88-C-8141
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Johnson DL. Blast Overpressure Studies. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratories; 1997. Final task report for U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. Technical report USAARL CR DAMD17–93-C-3101
    Google Scholar
  • 82 Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA, Patterson Jr JA. Threshold recovery functions following impulse noise trauma. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84 (03) 941-950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Spoendlin H. Anatomical changes following various noise exposures. In: Henderson D, Hamernik RP, Dosanjh DS, Mills JH. , eds. Effects of Noise on Hearing. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 84 Roberto M, Hamernik RP, Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Milone R. Impact noise and the equal energy hypothesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77 (04) 1514-1520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA, Hsueh KD. The energy spectrum of an impulse: its relation to hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (01) 197-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Levine S, Hofstetter P, Zheng XY, Henderson D. Duration and peak level as co-factors in hearing loss from exposure to impact noise. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998; 48: 27-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Gauger D, Berger EH. A new hearing protector rating: THE noise reduction statistic for use with A-weighting (NRSA). In: Report Prepared at the Request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, version 2.5; April 29, 2004. E-A-R 04-01/HP
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 American National Standards Institute/Acoustical Society of America (ANSI/ASA). Methods of Estimating Effective A-Weighted Sound Pressure Levels When Hearing Protectors Are Worn. New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America; 2007. ANSI/ASA 12.68
    Google Scholar
  • 89 Kardous CA, Franks JR, Davis RR. NIOSH/NHCA Best-Practices Workshop on impulsive noise. Noise Control Eng J 2005; 53 (02) 53-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Kardous CA, Murphy WJ. Noise control solutions for indoor firing ranges. Noise Control Eng J 2010; 58 (04) 345-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Gerges S, Sehrndt G, Parthey W. Noise sources. In: Goelzer B, Hansen CH, Sehrndt GA. , eds. Occupational Exposure to Noise: Evaluation, Prevention, and Control. Dortmund, Germany: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, World Health Organization; 2001. WHO Special Report S 64
    Google Scholar
  • 92 International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electroacoustics—Sound level meters Part 1—Specifications. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2002. International Standard IEC 61672-1
    Google Scholar
  • 93 Kardous CA. Development and Validation Testing of an Impulse Noise Meter. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2013. EPHB Report No. 350-11a
    Google Scholar
  • 94 Dunn DE, Davis RR, Merry CJ, Franks JR. Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (4 Pt 1): 1979-1985
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Sulkowski WJ, Lipowczan A. Impulse noise-induced hearing loss in drop forge operators and the energy concept. Noise Control Eng J 1982; 18 (01) 24-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Thiery L, Meyer-Bisch C. Hearing loss due to partly impulsive industrial noise exposure at levels between 87 and 90 dB(A). J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84 (02) 651-659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Hamernik RP, Qiu W, Davis B. The effects of the amplitude distribution of equal energy exposures on noise-induced hearing loss: the kurtosis metric. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114 (01) 386-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Erdreich J. A distribution based definition of impulse noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79 (04) 990-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Davis RI, Qiu W, Hamernik RP. Role of the kurtosis statistic in evaluating complex noise exposures for the protection of hearing. Ear Hear 2009; 30 (05) 628-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA, Davis RI, Lei SF. Hearing threshold shifts from repeated 6-h daily exposure to impact noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95 (01) 444-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Hamernik RP, Qiu W, Davis B. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122 (04) 2245-2254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Qiu W, Hamernik RP, Davis B. The kurtosis metric as an adjunct to energy in the prediction of trauma from continuous, nonGaussian noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 120 (06) 3901-3906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Qiu W, Hamernik RP, Davis RI. The value of a kurtosis metric in estimating the hazard to hearing of complex industrial noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 133 (05) 2856-2866
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Hamernik RP, Patterson JH, Salvi RJ. The effect of impulse intensity and the number of impulses on hearing and cochlear pathology in the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81 (04) 1118-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Danielson R, Henderson D, Gratton MA, Bianchi L, Salvi R. The importance of “temporal pattern” in traumatic impulse noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (01) 209-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi R. Potential for interaction of low-level impulse and continuous noise. Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH: U.S. Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory; 1981. AFAMRL-TR-80-68
    Google Scholar
  • 107 European Commission (EC). Council Directive of 12 May 1986 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to noise at work. Council of European Communities; 1986. 86/188/EEC
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 European Commission (EC). Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise). Official journal of the European Union: Seventeenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC; 2003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Dobie RA, Clark WW. Exchange rates for intermittent and fluctuating occupational noise: a systematic review of studies of human permanent threshold shift. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (01) 86-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Suter AH. Letter to the editor: an alternative interpretation of issues surrounding the exchange rates Re: Dobie, R.A., & Clark, W.W. (2014) Exchange Rates for Intermittent and Fluctuating Occupational Noise: A Systematic Review of Studies of Human Permanent Threshold Shift, Ear Hear, 35, 86-96. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (04) 485-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Voigt P, Godenhielm B, Ostlund E. Impulse noise—measurement and assessment of the risk of noise induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol Suppl 1980; 12 (01) (Suppl. 12) 319-325
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 von Gierke HE, Robinson DW, Karmy SJ. Results of the Workshop on Impulse Noise and Auditory Hazard. Southampton, United Kingdom: University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research; 1981. ISVR Memorandum 618
    Google Scholar
  • 113 Taylor W, Lempert B, Pelmear P, Hemstock I, Kershaw J. Noise levels and hearing thresholds in the drop forging industry. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76 (03) 807-819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Seixas N, Neitzel R, Sheppard L, Goldman B. Alternative metrics for noise exposure among construction workers. Ann Occup Hyg 2005; 49 (06) 493-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Seixas NS, Neitzel R, Stover B. , et al. 10-Year prospective study of noise exposure and hearing damage among construction workers. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69 (09) 643-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Zhao YM, Qiu W, Zeng L. , et al. Application of the kurtosis statistic to the evaluation of the risk of hearing loss in workers exposed to high-level complex noise. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (04) 527-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Davis RI, Qiu W, Heyer NJ. , et al. The use of the kurtosis metric in the evaluation of occupational hearing loss in workers in China: implications for hearing risk assessment. Noise Health 2012; 14 (61) 330-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Xie HW, Qiu W, Heyer NJ. , et al. The use of the kurtosis-adjusted cumulative noise exposure metric in evaluating the hearing loss risk for complex noise. Ear Hear 2016; 37 (03) 312-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Goley GS, Song WJ, Kim JH. Kurtosis corrected sound pressure level as a noise metric for risk assessment of occupational noises. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 129 (03) 1475-1481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 National Institutes on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders/National Institutes of Health (NIDCD/NIH). Synaptopathy and Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Animal Studies and Implications for Human Hearing. Workshop summary and recommendations. Workshop May 4–5, 2015; Rockville, MD
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth. J Neurosci 2006; 26 (07) 2115-2123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 2009; 29 (45) 14077-14085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 2015; 330 (Pt B): 191-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Lin HW, Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Primary neural degeneration in the Guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011; 12 (05) 605-616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. J Neurophysiol 2013; 110 (03) 577-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Fernandez KA, Jeffers PW, Lall K, Liberman MC, Kujawa SG. Aging after noise exposure: acceleration of cochlear synaptopathy in “recovered” ears. J Neurosci 2015; 35 (19) 7509-7520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 King PF. Psychogenic deafness. J Laryngol Otol 1954; 68 (09) 623-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Kopetzky SJ. Deafness, Tinnitus and Vertigo. New York, NY: Nelson; 1948
    Google Scholar
  • 129 Plack CJ, Barker D, Prendergast G. Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends Hear 2014; 18: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Zhao F, Stephens D. A critical review of King-Kopetzky syndrome: Hearing difficulties, but normal hearing?. Audiol Med 2007; 5 (02) 119-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Moser T, Predoehl F, Starr A. Review of hair cell synapse defects in sensorineural hearing impairment. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34 (06) 995-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Spoendlin H. Innervation densities of the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 1972; 73 (02) 235-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Zeng F-G. Uncovering hidden hearing loss. Hear J 2015; 68 (01) 6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Schalk TB, Sachs MB. Nonlinearities in auditory-nerve fiber responses to bandlimited noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67 (03) 903-913
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Costalupes JA, Young ED, Gibson DJ. Effects of continuous noise backgrounds on rate response of auditory nerve fibers in cat. J Neurophysiol 1984; 51 (06) 1326-1344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Gates GA, Schmid P, Kujawa SG, Nam B, D'Agostino R. Longitudinal threshold changes in older men with audiometric notches. Hear Res 2000; 141 (1–2): 220-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Rosenhall U. The influence of ageing on noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health 2003; 5 (20) 47-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Schaette R, McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 2011; 31 (38) 13452-13457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Roberts LE, Eggermont JJ, Caspary DM, Shore SE, Melcher JR, Kaltenbach JA. Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J Neurosci 2010; 30 (45) 14972-14979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 140 Hickox AE, Liberman MC. Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus?. J Neurophysiol 2014; 111 (03) 552-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Bharadwaj HM, Masud S, Mehraei G, Verhulst S, Shinn-Cunningham BG. Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits. J Neurosci 2015; 35 (05) 2161-2172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Makary CA, Shin J, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, Merchant SN. Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011; 12 (06) 711-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Viana LM, O'Malley JT, Burgess BJ. , et al. Cochlear neuropathy in human presbycusis: Confocal analysis of hidden hearing loss in post-mortem tissue. Hear Res 2015; 327: 78-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Department of the Army. Noise and Conservation of Hearing. Washington, DC: Department of the Army; 1972. Technical Bulletin TB MED 251
    Google Scholar
  • 145 Department of the Army. Hearing Conservation. Washington, DC: Department of the Army; 1980. Technical Bulletin TB MED 501
    Google Scholar
  • 146 Department of the Army. Memorandum (Army Hearing Conservation Program Policy) of June 24, 1994, from Frederick J. Erdtmann, Deputy Director, Professional Services, Department of the Army, Office of the Surgeon General, Falls Church, VA; 1994. Memorandum SGPS-PSP (40-5)
    PubMed
  • 147 Department of the Navy. Chapter 18, Hearing Conservation and Noise Abatement. Washington, DC: Department of the Navy; 1994. OPNAVINST 5100.23D
    Google Scholar
  • 148 Department of the Navy. Navy Medical Department Hearing Conservation Program Procedures. Washington, DC: Department of the Navy; 2008. TM 6260.51.99-2
    Google Scholar