Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2017; 01(01): 005-012
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603564
Original Article
Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

The Clinical and Technical Effectiveness of Endovascular Embolization in Patients with Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Azadeh Elmi
1   Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
T. Gregory Walker
1   Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Suvranu Ganguli
1   Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Sanjeeva P. Kalva
2   University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 July 2017 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and Aim Endovascular embolization is a well-established option in the management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) after failed therapeutic endoscopy; however, questions remain concerning the outcomes and the various predictors of clinical and technical success of this therapy. The authors aimed to assess the effectiveness of endovascular embolization in patients with nonvariceal GIB.

Method Clinical records of 88 patients (mean age: 67.8 years) who underwent endovascular embolization for GIB were reviewed. Patient demographics, history, angiographic findings, treatment, and outcomes were recorded. The technical success of embolization, and the 24-hour and 30-day rebleeding and mortality rates were calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the factors associated with 24-hour and 30-day rebleeding.

Results Angiography demonstrated signs of bleeding in 63 (71.6%) patients and all underwent selective embolization of the abnormal artery. Empiric embolization was performed in 25 patients. Embolization was performed with coils (n = 45), Gelfoam (n = 12), microparticles (n = 14), glue (n = 2), or a combination of these (n = 15). The technical success rate was 96.6%. The 24-hour and 30-day rebleeding occurred in 13 (14.7%) and 16 (18.2%) patients, respectively. The 24-hour and 30-day mortality rates were 9.1 and 11.3%, respectively. Ischemic complications following embolization were seen in three patients, of which two required surgery. Based on the multivariate analysis, the need for continued transfusion after embolization and prior GIB were independent variables associated with 24-hour and 30-day rebleeding, respectively.

Conclusions Endovascular embolization has a high technical and clinical success in patients presenting with nonvariceal GIB.

Keywords

gastrointestinal bleeding - endoscopy - angiography - embolization
 

  • References

  • 1 Rockey DC. Gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2005; 34 (04) 581-588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Laing CJ, Tobias T, Rosenblum DI, Banker WL, Tseng L, Tamarkin SW. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: emerging role of multidetector CT angiography and review of current imaging techniques. Radiographics 2007; 27 (04) 1055-1070
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ferguson CB, Mitchell RM. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: standard and new treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2005; 34 (04) 607-621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Welch CE, Hedberg S. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage. I. General considerations of diagnosis and the rapy. Adv Surg 1973; 7: 95-148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ang D, Teo EK, Tan A. , et al. A comparison of surgery versus transcatheter angiographic embolization in the treatment of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding uncontrolled by endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24 (08) 929-938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Arrayeh E, Fidelman N, Gordon RL. , et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization for upper gastrointestinal nonvariceal hemorrhage: is empiric embolization warranted?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35 (06) 1346-1354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wong TC, Wong KT, Chiu PW. , et al. A comparison of angiographic embolization with surgery after failed endoscopic hemostasis to bleeding peptic ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73 (05) 900-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 van Vugt R, Bosscha K, van Munster IP, de Jager CP, Rutten MJ. Embolization as treatment of choice for bleeding peptic ulcers in high-risk patients. Dig Surg 2009; 26 (01) 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Loffroy R, Guiu B, Cercueil JP. , et al. Refractory bleeding from gastroduodenal ulcers: arterial embolization in high-operative-risk patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42 (04) 361-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kuo WT, Lee DE, Saad WE, Patel N, Sahler LG, Waldman DL. Superselective microcoil embolization for the treatment of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (12) 1503-1509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lundgren JA, Matsushima K, Lynch FC, Frankel H, Cooney RN. Angiographic embolization of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of clinical failure. J Trauma 2011; 70 (05) 1208-1212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hongsakul K, Pakdeejit S, Tanutit P. Outcome and predictive factors of successful transarterial embolization for the treatment of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Acta Radiol 2014; 55 (02) 186-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rossetti A, Buchs NC, Breguet R, Bucher P, Terraz S, Morel P. Transarterial embolization in acute colonic bleeding: review of 11 years of experience and long-term results. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28 (06) 777-782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Defreyne L, De Schrijver I, Decruyenaere J. , et al. Therapeutic decision-making in endoscopically unmanageable nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008; 31 (05) 897-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Millward SF. ACR Appropriateness Criteria on treatment of acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal tract bleeding. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5 (04) 550-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ripoll C, Bañares R, Beceiro I. , et al. Comparison of transcatheter arterial embolization and surgery for treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer after endoscopic treatment failure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15 (05) 447-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jailani RF, Kosai NR, Yaacob NY. , et al. Transarterial angioembolization versus surgery after failed endoscopic therapy for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Ter 2014; 165 (06) 294-298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lee HH, Park JM, Chun HJ, Oh JS, Ahn HJ, Choi MG. Transcatheter arterial embolization for endoscopically unmanageable non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50 (07) 809-815
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Loffroy R, Rao P, Ota S, De Lin M, Kwak BK, Geschwind JF. Embolization of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage resistant to endoscopic treatment: results and predictors of recurrent bleeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33 (06) 1088-1100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Morris DC, Nichols DM, Connell DG, Burhenne HJ. Embolization of the left gastric artery in the absence of angiographic extravasation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1986; 9 (04) 195-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lang EV, Picus D, Marx MV, Hicks ME, Friedland GW. Massive upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage with normal findings on arteriography: value of prophylactic embolization of the left gastric artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158 (03) 547-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Poultsides GA, Kim CJ, Orlando III R, Peros G, Hallisey MJ, Vignati PV. Angiographic embolization for gastroduodenal hemorrhage: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome. Arch Surg 2008; 143 (05) 457-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Loffroy R, Guiu B, D'Athis P. , et al. Arterial embolotherapy for endoscopically unmanageable acute gastroduodenal hemorrhage: predictors of early rebleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7 (05) 515-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Defreyne L, Vanlangenhove P, De Vos M. , et al. Embolization as a first approach with endoscopically unmanageable acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Radiology 2001; 218 (03) 739-748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hur S, Jae HJ, Lee M, Kim HC, Chung JW. Safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization for lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a single-center experience with 112 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (01) 10-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Artigas JM, Martí M, Soto JA, Esteban H, Pinilla I, Guillén E. Multidetector CT angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: technique and findings. Radiographics 2013; 33 (05) 1453-1470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ren JZ, Zhang MF, Rong AM. , et al. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: role of 64-row computed tomographic angiography in diagnosis and therapeutic planning. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21 (13) 4030-4037
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Chan V, Tse D, Dixon S. , et al. Outcome following a negative CT angiogram for gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38 (02) 329-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar