Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2017; 38(03): 220-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602841
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Speech Recognition as a Practice Tool for Dysarthria

Susan Koch Fager
1   Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals, Lincoln, Nebraska.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 June 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Recovery of speech in dysarthria requires an extensive amount of time and practice. Speech recognition (SR) technology may support long-term practice and speech recovery efforts for individuals with dysarthria. However, SR technology development has been focused on typical (neurologically intact) speakers to support writing. This article describes the history and development of SR technology, how it has been used by individuals with dysarthria, and includes a case study illustration of the use of a novel SR technology as a speech practice tool. Case study participants included two individuals with differing onsets and dysarthria due to traumatic brain injury. Results indicated that both were able to make acoustic/perceptual changes during speech practice sessions, and one participant demonstrated generalization of changes to habitual speech. Limitations and future directions of current SR technology as a speech practice tool are discussed.

Keywords

Dysarthria - speech recognition - speech practice
 

  • References

  • 1 Yorkston K, Beukelman D, Strand E, Hakel M. Management of Motor Speech Disorders in Children and Adults. Austin, TX: Pro-ed; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Learning and Performance. From Principles to Application. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Maas E, Robin DA, Austermann Hula SN. , et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2008; 17 (03) 277-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jordan FM. Whatever happened after the “return from silence”?. Brain Inj 1994; 8 (03) 277-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Workinger MS, Netsell R. Restoration of intelligible speech 13 years post-head injury. Brain Inj 1992; 6 (02) 183-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rosen K, Yampolsky S. Automatic speech recognition and a review of its functioning with dysarthric speech. J Augment Altern Commun 2000; 16: 48-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Venkatagiri HS. Speech recognition technology applications in communication disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 11: 323-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fried-Oken M. Voice recognition device as a computer interface for motor and speech impaired people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66 (10) 678-681
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Coleman C, Meyers L. Computer recognition of the speech of adults with cerebral palsy and dysarthria. Augment Altern Commun 1991; 7: 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brown C, Cavalier AR. Voice recognition technology and persons with severe mental retardation and severe physical impairment: learning, response differentiation, and affect. J Spec Educ Technol 1992; 11 (04) 196-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dabbagh HH, Damper RI. Text composition by voice: design issues and implementations. Augment Altern Commun 1985; 1 (02) 84-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Noyes J, Frankish C. Speech recognition technology for individuals with disabilities. Augment Altern Commun 1992; 8 (04) 297-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ferrier LJ, Jarrell N, Carpenter T, Shane HC. A case study of a dysarthric speaker using the Dragon Dictate voice recognition system. J Comput Users Speech Hear 1992; 8: 33-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Blaney B, Wilson J. Acoustic variability in dysarthria and computer speech recognition. Clin Linguist Phon 2000; 14 (04) 307-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ferrier L, Shane H, Ballard H, Carpenter T, Benoit A. Dysarthric speakers' intelligibility and speech characteristics in relation to computer speech recognition. Augment Altern Commun 1995; 11: 165-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Doyle PC, Leeper HA, Kotler AL. , et al. Dysarthric speech: a comparison of computerized speech recognition and listener intelligibility. J Rehabil Res Dev 1997; 34 (03) 309-316
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Thomas-Stonell CN, Kotler A, Leeper H, Doyle P. Computerized speech recognition: influence of intelligibility and perceptual consistency on recognition accuracy. Augment Altern Commun 1998; 14: 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hux K, Rankin-Erickson J, Manasse N, Lauritzen E. Accuracy of three speech recognition systems: case study of dysarthric speech. Augment Altern Commun 2000; 16: 186-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kotler A, Thomas-Stonell N. Effects of speech training on the accuracy of speech recognition for an individual with a speech impairment. Augment Altern Commun 1997; 13: 71-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Manasse NJ, Hux K, Rankin-Erickson JL. Speech recognition training for enhancing written language generation by a traumatic brain injury survivor. Brain Inj 2000; 14 (11) 1015-1034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Raghavendra P, Rosengren E, Hunnicutt S. An investigation of different degrees of dysarthric speech as input to speaker-adaptive and speaker-dependent recognition systems. Augment Altern Commun 2001; 17: 265-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wan V, Carmichael J. Polynomial dynamic time warping kernel support vector machines for dysarthric speech recognition with sparse training data. INTERSPEECH 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, September 4–8, 2005 in Lisboa, Portugal
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Polur PD, Miller GE. Effect of high-frequency spectral components in computer recognition of dysarthric speech based on a Mel-cepstral stochastic model. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42 (03) 363-371
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Omar S, Morales C, Cox S. Modeling errors in automatic speech recognition for dysarthric speakers. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2009; 20 (09) 1-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hawley M. Speech recognition as an input to electronic assistive technology. Br J Occup Ther 2002; 65: 15-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hawley MS, Enderby P, Green P. , et al. A speech-controlled environmental control system for people with severe dysarthria. Med Eng Phys 2007; 29 (05) 586-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Judge S, Robertson Z, Hawley M, Enderby P. Speech-driven environmental control systems—a qualitative analysis of users' perceptions. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009; 4 (03) 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hird K, Hennessey NW. Facilitating use of speech recognition software for people with disabilities: a comparison of three treatments. Clin Linguist Phon 2007; 21 (03) 211-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kitzing P, Maier A, Ahlander VL. Automatic speech recognition (ASR) and its use as a tool for assessment or therapy of voice, speech, and language disorders. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2009; 34 (02) 91-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Maier A, Haderlein T, Stelzle F. , et al. Automatic speech recognition systems for the evaluation of voice and speech disorders in head and neck cancer. EURASIP J Audio Speech Music Process 2009; 20 (10) 926-951
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 McHenry M, LaConte SM. Computer speech recognition as an objective measure of intelligibility. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol 2010; 18 (04) 99-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Abad A, Pompili A, Costa A. , et al. Automatic word naming recognition for an on-line aphasia treatment system. Comput Speech Lang 2013; 27 (06) 1235-1248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Palmer R, Enderby P, Hawley M. Addressing the needs of speakers with longstanding dysarthria: computerized and traditional therapy compared. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2007; 42 (01) (Suppl. 01) 61-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Watson CS, Reed DJ, Kewley-Port D, Maki D. The Indiana Speech Training Aid (ISTRA). I: comparisons between human and computer-based evaluation of speech quality. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32 (02) 245-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Bunnell H, Yarrington D, Polikoff JB. STAR: Articulation Training for Young Children. INTERSPEECH 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Oct. 16–20, 2000, Beijjing, China
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ryalls J. Comparison of two computerised speech training systems: Speech Viewer and ISTRA. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1989; 13 (03) 53-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hosom J, Jakobs T, Baker A, Fager S. Automatic speech recognition for assistive writing in speech supplemented word prediction. Interspeech 2010; xx: 2674-2677
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Fager SK, Beukelman DR, Jakobs T, Hosom JP. Evaluation of a speech recognition prototype for speakers with moderate and severe dysarthria: a preliminary report. Augment Altern Commun 2010; 26 (04) 267-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yorkston K, Beukelman D, Hakel M, Dorsey M. Sentence Intelligibility Test [Computer software]. Lincoln, NE: Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Bachu RG, Kopparthi S, Adapa B, Barkana BD. Separation of voiced and unvoiced using zero crossing rate and energy of the speech signal. Paper presented at: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Zone Conference Proceedings; June 24–25, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Shete DS, Patil SB, Patil SB. Zero crossing rate and energy of the speech signal of Devanagari script. IOSR-JVSP 2014; 4 (01) 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar