CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Iberoamericana de Cirugía de la Mano 2017; 45(01): 016-023
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602793
Original Article | Artículo Original
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Doble fijación para la rotura de bíceps distal: Descripción de la técnica y evaluación de resultados

Double Fixation for Distal Biceps Rupture: Technique Description and Results Evaluation
Miguel A. Capomassi
1   Instituto de Traumatología Dr. Jaime Slullitel, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
,
Manuel A. Vélez
1   Instituto de Traumatología Dr. Jaime Slullitel, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
,
R Martín Gardenal
1   Instituto de Traumatología Dr. Jaime Slullitel, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

25 October 2015

25 March 2017

Publication Date:
14 June 2017 (online)

Resumen

Introducción La ruptura del bíceps distal es una lesión infrecuente producida por la aplicación de una carga excéntrica sobre el codo flexionado. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar nuestros resultados para la reinserción del bíceps distal mediante la técnica de doble fijación con botón de anclaje cortical y tornillo interferencial de biotenodesis a través de una incisión anterior única, con una casuística mayor a la presentada con anterioridad.

Material y Método Entre agosto de 2008 y agosto de 2015, se intervino 24 casos de rotura del bíceps distal tratados quirúrgicamente por vía anterior limitada. Los 22 últimos casos consecutivos fueron tratados con doble fijación utilizando botón extracortical y tornillo de biotenodesis, y son el grupo de estudio de este artículo. Todos eran hombres, con una mediana de edad de 39,5 años (rango 22–59). Los pacientes fueron evaluados con el Cuestionario DASH y la valoración Subjetiva/Objetiva de Andrews y Carson, la fuerza de flexión y supinación se controló con la escala del British Medical Research Council modificada por Mackinnon y Dellon (M0-M5).

Resultados El valor promedio del cuestionario DASH fue de 1,7 (0 - 31,6) y el de Andrews y Carson, de 197,5 (135–200), con 20 resultados excelentes, 1 bueno y 1 regular. Todos consiguieron una fuerza M5 para la flexión y la supinación de antebrazo. El tiempo promedio de seguimiento fue de 17,5 meses (10–38). En tres pacientes se registraron complicaciones, todos con una recuperación total.

Conclusión La técnica descrita demostró ser segura y eficaz, con resultados satisfactorios y baja tasa de complicaciones.

Nivel de Evidencia: IV. Serie de Casos.

Abstract

Purpose Distal biceps rupture is an unusual lesion produced after an eccentric load is applied to the bent elbow. The aim of this study is to analyze our results for the reinsertion of the distal biceps with a double fixation technique of cortical button and biotenodesis interference screw through a single anterior incision, with a larger number of cases cases than previously submitted.

Methods Between August 2008 and August 2015, 24 cases of distal biceps rupture, surgically treated through an anterior limited procedure. The last 22 consecutive cases were treated with double fixation using an extracortical button and biotenodesis screw and are the group tudied in this paper. All patients were males with a mean age of 39,5 years (range 22–59). Patients were evaluated using the DASH questionnaire and the subjective/ objective scoring system of Andrews and Carson, flexion and supination strengths were assessed with the British Medical Research Council scale, modified by Mackinnon and Dellon (M0-M5).

Results The mean DASH score was 1,7 (0–31,6), and the mean Andrews and Carson score was 197,5 (135–200), with 20 excellent, 1 good and 1 regular results. All patients achieved a M5 (level of) flexion and supination strenght of the forearm. The median follow-up period was 17,5 months (10–38). Complications were registered in three patients that recovered totally.

Conclusion The described technique proved to be both reliable and effective, giving satisfactory results with a low complication rate.

Level of Evidence IV. Case Series.

 
  • Bibliografía

  • 1 Baker BE, Bierwagen D. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. Operative versus non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (03) 414-417
  • 2 Hetsroni I, Pilz-Burstein R, Nyska M, Back Z, Barchilon V, Mann G. Avulsion of the distal biceps brachii tendon in middle-aged population: is surgical repair advisable? A comparative study of 22 patients treated with either nonoperative management or early anatomical repair. Injury 2008; 39 (07) 753-760
  • 3 El-Hawary R, Macdermid JC, Faber KJ, Patterson SD, King GJ. Distal biceps tendon repair: comparison of surgical techniques. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (03) 496-502
  • 4 Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Arciero RA, Romeo AA, Cohen MS, Nicholson G. Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using a combined anatomic interference screw and cortical button. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 6 (02) 108-115
  • 5 Mazzocca AD, Burton KJ, Romeo AA, Santangelo S, Adams DA, Arciero RA. Biomechanical evaluation of 4 techniques of distal biceps brachii tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (02) 252-258
  • 6 Sethi P, Cunningham J, Miller S, Sutton K, Mazzocca A. Anatomical repair of the distal biceps tendon using the Tension-Slide Technique. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 9 (04) 182-187
  • 7 Kelly EW, Morrey BF, O'Driscoll SW. Complications of repair of the distal biceps tendon with the modified two-incision technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82-A (11) 1575-1581
  • 8 John CK, Field LD, Weiss KS, Savoie III FH. Single-incision repair of acute distal biceps ruptures by use of suture anchors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16 (01) 78-83
  • 9 Kobayashi K, Bruno RJ, Cassidy C. Single anterior incision suture anchor technique for distal biceps tendon ruptures. Orthopedics 2003; 26 (08) 767-770
  • 10 Bain GI, Prem H, Heptinstall RJ, Verhellen R, Paix D. Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture: a new technique using the Endobutton. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000; 9 (02) 120-126
  • 11 Silva J, Eskander MS, Lareau C, DeAngelis NA. Treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures using a single-incision technique and a Bio-Tenodesis screw. Orthopedics 2010; 33 (07) 477
  • 12 McKee MD, Hirji R, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, Waddell JP. Patient-oriented functional outcome after repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using a single-incision technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14 (03) 302-306
  • 13 Fischer WR, Shepanek LA. Avulsion of the insertion of the biceps brachii; report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1956; 38-A (01) 158-159
  • 14 Boyd HB, Anderson LD. A method for reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1961; 43: 1041-1043
  • 15 Phadnis J, Bain G. Endoscopic-assisted Distal Biceps Footprint Repair. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2015; 19 (02) 55-59
  • 16 Capomassi MA, Gardenal RM, Slullitel M, Suárez E, Benedetto I. Rotura del bíceps distal: Evaluación de resultados con técnica de doble fijación. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2013; 78 (04) 171-179
  • 17 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. ; The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (06) 602-608
  • 18 Andrews JR, Carson WG. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Arthroscopy 1985; 1 (02) 97-107
  • 19 Medical Research Council. Nerve Injuries Committee. Results of nerve suture. En: Seddon H. , ed. Peripheral Nerve Injuries. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1954
  • 20 Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Results of nerve repair and grafting: Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve. New York: Thieme; 1988. , p. 115
  • 21 Sutton KM, Dodds SD, Ahmad CS, Sethi PM. Surgical treatment of distal biceps rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18 (03) 139-148
  • 22 Morrey BF, Askew LJ, An KN, Dobyns JH. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (03) 418-421
  • 23 Idler CS, Montgomery III WH, Lindsey DP, Badua PA, Wynne GF, Yerby SA. Distal biceps tendon repair: a biomechanical comparison of intact tendon and 2 repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (06) 968-974
  • 24 Cohen MS. Complications of distal biceps tendon repairs. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2008; 16 (03) 148-153
  • 25 Potapov A, Laflamme YG, Gagnon S, Canet F, Rouleau DM. Progressive osteolysis of the radius after distal biceps tendon repair with the bioabsorbable screw. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (05) 819-826
  • 26 Heinzelmann AD, Savoie III FH, Ramsey JR, Field LD, Mazzocca AD. A combined technique for distal biceps repair using a soft tissue button and biotenodesis interference screw. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (05) 989-994