Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2017; 34(02): 208-212
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602597
How I Do It
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Techniques for Retrieval of Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Cayce S. Workman
1   Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Robert J. Lewandowski
1   Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Kush R. Desai
1   Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 June 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

The use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) has increased significantly since their introduction in the early 1970s, largely due to expansion of relative and absolute indications for placement, lowering thresholds for utilization. In the short term, they have demonstrated a reduction in both the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and PE-related mortality.[1] [2] However, studies suggest that these benefits may be counterbalanced by an increase in the rate of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT),[1] as well as several other device-related complications including device fracture[3] [4] [5] and component perforation[6] [7] with subsequent penetration into nearby abdominal and retroperitoneal structures such as the pancreas,[8] duodenum,[9] [10] and aorta.[11] Though numerous advanced techniques have been described for the removal of embedded retrievable IVCFs,[12] [13] [14] there is a paucity of literature on the retrieval of permanent devices. In this article, we will present our approach to the retrieval of Greenfield (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), TrapEase (Cordis, Miami Lakes, FL), and Simon Nitinol (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, AZ) filters. For each device, we will provide a brief history of the device's development and implementation into clinical practice; this will be followed by a description of our procedural approach, which we will illustrate with a case and images from our practice. We will also discuss techniques described in the literature for the retrieval of VenaTech (B. Braun, Bethlehem, PA) devices.

 

  • References

  • 1 Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F. , et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338 (07) 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Muriel A, Jiménez D, Aujesky D. , et al; RIETE Investigators. Survival effects of inferior vena cava filter in patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism and a significant bleeding risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63 (16) 1675-1683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nicholson W, Nicholson WJ, Tolerico P. , et al. Prevalence of fracture and fragment embolization of Bard retrievable vena cava filters and clinical implications including cardiac perforation and tamponade. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170 (20) 1827-1831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vijay K, Hughes JA, Burdette AS. , et al. Fractured Bard Recovery, G2, and G2 express inferior vena cava filters: incidence, clinical consequences, and outcomes of removal attempts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23 (02) 188-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tam MD, Spain J, Lieber M, Geisinger M, Sands MJ, Wang W. Fracture and distant migration of the Bard Recovery filter: a retrospective review of 363 implantations for potentially life-threatening complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23 (02) 199-205.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Durack JC, Westphalen AC, Kekulawela S. , et al. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Günther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35 (02) 299-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Olorunsola OG, Kohi MP, Fidelman N. , et al. Caval penetration by retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a retrospective comparison of Option and Günther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (04) 566-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ford ME, Lippert JA, McGraw JK. Symptomatic filter penetration presenting as pancreatitis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (04) 574-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Park JR, Oza VM, Krishna SG. Asymptomatic duodenal perforation from an inferior vena cava filter. ACG Case Rep J 2014; 1 (03) 143-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Malgor RD, Labropoulos N. A systematic review of symptomatic duodenal perforation by inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55 (03) 856-861.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Putterman D, Niman D, Cohen G. Aortic pseudoaneurysm after penetration by a Simon nitinol inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (04) 535-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Al-Hakim R, Kee ST, Olinger K, Lee EW, Moriarty JM, McWilliams JP. Inferior vena cava filter retrieval: effectiveness and complications of routine and advanced techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (06) 933-939 , quiz 940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kuo WT, Robertson SW, Odegaard JI, Hofmann LV. Complex retrieval of fractured, embedded, and penetrating inferior vena cava filters: a prospective study with histologic and electron microscopic analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (05) 622-630.e1 , quiz 631
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Iliescu B, Haskal ZJ. Advanced techniques for removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35 (04) 741-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Galanaud JP, Laroche JP, Righini M. The history and historical treatments of deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11 (03) 402-411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Princewell K, Awan OA, Ali MM, Awan YA, Iliescu B. Inferior vena cava filters: a contemporary review. App Radiol [serial online]. 2011 Online. Available at: http://appliedradiology.com/articles/inferior-vena-cava-filters-a-contemporary-review . Accessed November 6, 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Martin MJ, Blair KS, Curry TK, Singh N. Vena cava filters: current concepts and controversies for the surgeon. Curr Probl Surg 2010; 47 (07) 524-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Stavropoulos SW, Dixon RG, Burke CT. , et al. Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: use of endobronchial forceps. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (09) 1297-1301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rubenstein L, Chun AK, Chew M, Binkert CA. Loop-snare technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrievals. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18 (10) 1315-1318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rousseau H, Perreault P, Otal P. , et al. The 6-F nitinol TrapEase inferior vena cava filter: results of a prospective multicenter trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12 (03) 299-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sano M, Unno N, Yamamoto N, Tanaka H, Konno H. Frequent fracture of TrapEase inferior vena cava filters: a long-term follow-up assessment. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172 (02) 189-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Usoh F, Hingorani A, Ascher E. , et al. Prospective randomized study comparing the clinical outcomes between inferior vena cava Greenfield and TrapEase filters. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52 (02) 394-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Scher D, Venbrux A, Okapal K. , et al. Retrieval of TrapEase and Optease inferior vena cava filters with extended dwell times. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (10) 1519-1525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kuo WT, Odegaard JI, Rosenberg JK, Hofmann LV. Excimer laser-assisted removal of embedded inferior vena cava filters: a single-center prospective study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (05) 560-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, Waltman AC, Geller SC, Fan CM. Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 216 (01) 54-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Poletti PA, Becker CD, Prina L. , et al. Long-term results of the Simon nitinol inferior vena cava filter. Eur Radiol 1998; 8 (02) 289-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Proctor MC, Cho KJ, Greenfield LJ. In vivo evaluation of vena caval filters: can function be linked to design characteristics?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000; 23 (06) 460-465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kuo WT, Deso SE, Robertson SW. Vena Tech LGM filter retrieval 16 years after implantation: piecemeal removal by intentional mechanical fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (11) 1731-1737
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kuo WT, Cupp JS, Louie JD. , et al. Complex retrieval of embedded IVC filters: alternative techniques and histologic tissue analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35 (03) 588-597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ahmed O, Madassery S, Heussner D. , et al. VenaTech LP filter retrieval for filter-related thrombosis or malpositioning. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (11) 1724-1726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar