Cranial Maxillofac Trauma Reconstruction 2017; 10(04): 271-277
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1601429
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA

Comparing Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology Management in Cleft Care: An Analysis of 4,999 Cases

Kevin T. Jubbal
1  School of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, California
,
Dmitry Zavlin
2  Division of Plastic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Shola Olorunnipa
3  Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Anthony Echo
2  Division of Plastic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Edward P. Buchanan
3  Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Larry H. Hollier
3  Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

20 September 2016

20 November 2016

Publication Date:
03 April 2017 (eFirst)

  Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Care for patients with cleft lip and palate is best managed by a craniofacial team consisting of a variety of specialists, including surgeons, who are generally plastic surgeons or otolaryngologists trained in the United States. The goal of this study was to compare the surgical approaches and management algorithms of cleft lip, cleft palate, and nasal reconstruction between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists.

We performed a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database between 2012 and 2014 to identify patients undergoing primary repair of cleft lip, cleft palate, and associated rhinoplasty. Two cohorts based on primary specialty, plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists, were compared in relation to patient characteristics, 30-day postoperative outcomes, procedure type, and intraoperative variables.

Plastic surgeons performed the majority of surgical repairs, with 85.5% (n = 1,472) of cleft lip, 79.3% (n = 2,179) of cleft palate, and 87.9% (n = 465) of rhinoplasty procedures. There was no difference in the age of primary cleft lip repair or rhinoplasty. However, plastic surgeons performed primary cleft palate repair earlier than otolaryngologists (p = 0.03). Procedure type varied between the specialties. In rhinoplasty, otolaryngologists were more likely to use septal or ear cartilage, whereas plastic surgeons preferred rib cartilage. Results were similar, with no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality, reoperation, readmission, or complications.

Significant variation exists in the treatment of cleft lip and palate based on specialty service with regard to procedure timing and type. However, short-term rates of mortality, wound occurrence, reoperation, readmission, and surgical or medical complications remain similar.

Keywords

otolaryngology - plastic surgery - outcomes - cleft lip/palate