Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 65(S 03): S167-S173
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1601375
Tribute
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trials on Myocardial Revascularization and Complete Arterial Bypass Grafting

Ardawan J. Rastan
1  Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Herz-Kreislauf-Zentrum Rotenburg, Rotenburg, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

02. März 2017

02. März 2017

Publikationsdatum:
07. April 2017 (online)

Abstract

Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr from the very beginning of his career as a cardiac surgeon was involved in the refinements of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). At the Leipzig Heart Center, his spirit of early adapting to new technologies inspired the entire team and led to a matchless scientific atmosphere to find solutions to improve almost all fields of cardiac surgery, including CABG. In combination with a tremendous number of patients with indications for isolated coronary artery bypass Prof. Mohr as the surgical principle investigator and the Leipzig Heart Center were able to include patients in the Synergy between PCI [percutaneous coronary intervention] with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial, the first randomized trials comparing CABG and PCIs using the drug-eluting stents. Final SYNTAX results after 5 years gave direction and scientific evidence for contemporary European revascularization guidelines. These guidelines recommend PCI as an alternative first-line treatment option in patients with coronary three-vessel disease and left main stenosis having low coronary complexity based on the angiographic SYNTAX score. However, the study demonstrated the significant superiority of CABG over PCI in all other patients, especially in these with complex three-vessel disease. The specific characteristic of the SYNTAX study is that the distinguished results were confirmed by several post-SYNTAX comparative randomized trials on coronary revascularization including left main disease and clinical registries even when contemporary drug-eluting stent designs were used. When performing CABG the question of the best second graft remains unclear. While several mono-institutional reports and large meta-analyses demonstrated clear superiority in terms of long-term survival when using bilateral mammary versus single mammary revascularization, this benefit could not be confirmed in randomized trials after 5 years.