CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39(03): 110-114
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1600521
Original Article
Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Frequency of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Products of Conception

Frequência de anomalias cromossômicas em material de aborto
Thaís Mesquita Alves Teles
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Human, Social and Health Sciences, Universidade FUMEC, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Carolina Maria Marques de Paula
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Human, Social and Health Sciences, Universidade FUMEC, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Mariana Gontijo Ramos
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Human, Social and Health Sciences, Universidade FUMEC, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Helena B. B. L. Martins da Costa
2   Department of Molecular Biology, Códon Biotechnology Laboratory, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
3   Department of Cytogenetics, Códon Biotechnology Laboratory, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Cyntia Roberta Almeida Andrade
2   Department of Molecular Biology, Códon Biotechnology Laboratory, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Sarah Abreu Coxir
3   Department of Cytogenetics, Códon Biotechnology Laboratory, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Maria Lectícia Firpe Penna
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Human, Social and Health Sciences, Universidade FUMEC, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

05 June 2016

09 January 2017

Publication Date:
15 March 2017 (online)

Abstract

Purpose To describe the frequencies of chromosomal abnormalities found in abortion material, and to observe its correlation to maternal age.

Methods A retrospective study was conducted based on data obtained from the databank of a medical genetics laboratory in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. A total of 884 results from products of conception analysis were included, 204 of which were analyzed by cytogenetics, and 680 by molecular biology based on quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR). The frequency of individual chromosomal aberrations and the relationship between the presence of anomalies and maternal age were also evaluated.

Results The conventional cytogenetics technique was able to detect 52% of normal and 48% of abnormal results in the analyzed material. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction revealed 60% of normal and 40% of abnormal results from the samples evaluated by this method. The presence of trisomy 15 was detected only by cytogenetics, as it was not included in the QF-PCR routine investigation in the laboratory. A significant increase in abnormal results was observed among women aged 35 years or older compared with younger women (p = 0.02).

Conclusion Chromosomal aberrations are still a major cause of spontaneous abortion, and the conventional cytogenetics technique is efficient for miscarriage material analysis, but molecular methods such as QF-PCR are adequate complementary strategies to detect the major chromosomal anomalies, leading to technical reports with reliable results.

Resumo

Objetivos Descrever a frequência de anomalias cromossômicas encontradas em material de aborto, e observar se estas estão relacionadas com a idade materna.

Métodos Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo no banco de dados de um laboratório de genética médica em Belo Horizonte, MG. O estudo incluiu 204 resultados avaliados por citogenética, e 680 resultados por biologia molecular baseada em reação em ensaio fluorescente da reação em cadeia da polimerase (QF-PCR), totalizando um número de 884 análises. A frequência de diferentes anomalias cromossômicas e a relação entre a presença de anomalias e a idade materna também foi avaliada.

Resultados A citogenética convencional foi capaz de detectar 52% de resultados normais e 48% de resultados anormais no material analisado. A QF-PCR revelou 60% de resultados normais e 40% de anormais nas amostras avaliadas por esta técnica. A presença da trissomia 15 foi detectada por citogenética, mas até então não era incluída na investigação por QF-PCR no laboratório. Um aumento significativo na quantidade de resultados anormais foi observado em mulheres com idade de 35 anos ou mais, quando comparado a mulheres mais jovens (p = 0,02).

Conclusão As aberrações cromossômicas são causas importantes de abortos espontâneos, e o estudo citogenético é eficaz para a análise das amostras de material de aborto, mas as técnicas moleculares, como a QF-PCR, representam métodos complementares adequados para detectar as principais anomalias cromossômicas, possibilitando a liberação de laudos com resultados confiáveis.

 
  • References

  • 1 Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Mouzon J. , et al. Glossário revisado da terminologia das Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida (TRA. 2009. Comitê Internacional para Monitorização da Tecnologia Reprodutiva Assistida (ICMART) e Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Caracas: Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida; 2009
  • 2 Rolnik DL, Carvalho MHB, Catelani ALPM. , et al. Cytogenetic analysis of material from spontaneous abortion. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2010; 56 (06) 681-683
  • 3 Hogge WA, Byrnes AL, Lanasa MC, Surti U. The clinical use of karyotyping spontaneous abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (02) 397-400 , discussion 400–402
  • 4 Gonçalves RO, Santos WVB, Sarno M, Cerqueira BAV, Gonçalves MS, Costa OLN. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent first trimester abortions. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2014; 36 (03) 113-117
  • 5 Hyde KJ, Schust DJ. Genetic considerations in recurrent pregnancy loss. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2015; 5 (03) a023119
  • 6 Bastos R, Ramalho C, Dória S. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortions or fetal deaths. Acta Med Port 2014; 27 (01) 42-48
  • 7 Isfer EV, Sanchez RC, Saito M. Medicina fetal: diagnóstico pré-natal e conduta. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 1996
  • 8 López AGA, Huerta SB, Galván RH, Posadas RA, del Ángel AG, González PG. Diagnóstico citogenético en aborto espontáneo del primer trimestre. Ginecol Obstet Méx 2003; 79 (12) 779-784
  • 9 Liu S, Song L, Cram DS. , et al. Traditional karyotyping vs copy number variation sequencing for detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated with spontaneous miscarriage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46 (04) 472-477
  • 10 Lathi RB, Gray Hazard FK, Heerema-McKenney A, Taylor J, Chueh JT. First trimester miscarriage evaluation. Semin Reprod Med 2011; 29 (06) 463-469
  • 11 Trask BJ. Human cytogenetics: 46 chromosomes, 46 years and counting. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3 (10) 769-778
  • 12 Pena SDJ, Costa HBBLM, Carvalho ERF, Sturzeneker R. Investigação genética dos abortamentos espontâneos pelo DNA. Rev Méd Minas Gerais 2003; 13 (03) 164-173
  • 13 Pinto Junior W. Diagnóstico pré-natal. Cien Saude Colet 2002; 7 (01) 139-157
  • 14 Vieira SR, Ferrari LP. Investigação de alterações citogenéticas em abortos espontâneos: um retrospecto de 2006 a 2011. Cad Esc Saúde 2013; 2 (10) 1-20
  • 15 Jenderny J. Chromosome aberrations in a large series of spontaneous miscarriages in the German population and review of the literature. Mol Cytogenet 2014; 7: 38
  • 16 Diego-Alvarez D, Garcia-Hoyos M, Trujillo MJ. , et al. Application of quantitative fluorescent PCR with short tandem repeat markers to the study of aneuploidies in spontaneous miscarriages. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (05) 1235-1243
  • 17 Coelho FF, Marques FK, Gonçalves MS, Almeida VC, Mateo EC, Ferreira AC. Detection of aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions by quantitative fluorescent PCR with short tandem repeat markers: a retrospective study. Genet Mol Res 2016; 15 (03) DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15038617.
  • 18 Shearer BM, Thorland EC, Carlson AW, Jalal SM, Ketterling RP. Reflex fluorescent in situ hybridization testing for unsuccessful product of conception cultures: a retrospective analysis of 5555 samples attempted by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Genet Med 2011; 13 (06) 545-552
  • 19 Zou G, Zhang J, Li XW, He L, He G, Duan T. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction to detect chromosomal anomalies in spontaneous abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 103 (03) 237-240
  • 20 Moraes AC, Moron AF, Hashimoto EM. , et al. Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of spontaneous abortion samples. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2005; 27 (09) 554-560
  • 21 Subramaniyam S, Pulijaal VR, Mathew S. Double and multiple chromosomal aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions: A single institutional experience. J Hum Reprod Sci 2014; 7 (04) 262-268
  • 22 Jia CW, Wang L, Lan YL. , et al. Aneuploidy in early miscarriage and its related factors. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015; 128 (20) 2772-2776
  • 23 Shen J, Wu W, Gao C. , et al. Chromosomal copy number analysis on chorionic villus samples from early spontaneous miscarriages by high throughput genetic technology. Mol Cytogenet 2016; 9: 7
  • 24 Nicolaides KH. First-trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities. Semin Perinatol 2005; 29 (04) 190-194
  • 25 Romero ST, Geiersbach KB, Paxton CN. , et al. Differentiation of genetic abnormalities in early pregnancy loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45 (01) 89-94
  • 26 Tekcan A, Tural S, Elbistan M, Kara N, Guven D, Kocak I. The combined QF-PCR and cytogenetic approach in prenatal diagnosis. Mol Biol Rep 2014; 41 (11) 7431-7436
  • 27 Barini R, Couto E, Mota MM, Santos CTM, Leiber SR, Batista SC. Recurrent spontaneous abortion-associated factors. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2000; 22 (04) 217-223