Frequency Dependence Hearing Loss Evaluation in Perforated Tympanic Membrane
28 July 2016
03 November 2016
28 February 2017 (eFirst)
Introduction Tympanic membrane perforation is a relatively common problem that predisposes patients to varying degrees of conductive hearing loss.
Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate and analyze the frequency dependence hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation based on the size and the site of perforation.
Methods For the study, I selected 71 patients' (89) ears for the cross-sectional study with tympanic membrane perforations; I examined the size and the site of perforations under the microscope and classified them into small, moderate, large, and subtotal perforations, and into anterior central, posterior central, malleolor central, and big central perforations. I measured mean level of speech frequencies hearing loss, and its relation with the site and the size of the perforation analyzed.
Results The mean hearing loss at different sizes of the perforation at all speech frequencies was 37.4 dB, with ABG of 26.6 dB, and its maximum loss was detected in subtotal perforation of 42.3 dB, with ABG of 33.7 dB, at 500 Hz frequency, while in relation to the sites, it was 38.2 dB, with ABG of 26.8 dB, and its maximum loss was detected in big central site perforation of 42.1 dB, with ABG of 33.6 dB, at 500 Hz frequency.
Conclusions The hearing loss was proportionally related with the sizes of the perforations, and the posterior site had greater impact on the hearing than anterior site perforations. This was also applied to the frequency dependence hearing level, as was detected to be worse at lower frequencies as 500 Hz, than those of 1000–2000 Hz.
- 1 Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT. Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110 (3 Pt 1): 1432-1444
- 2 Mehta RP, Rosowski JJ, Voss SE, O'Neil E, Merchant SN. Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27 (02) 136-143
- 3 Ogisi FO, Adobamen P. Type 1 Tympanoplasty in Benin: a 10-year review. Niger Postgrad Med J 2004; 11 (02) 84-87
- 4 Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT. How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission?. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121 (02) 169-173
- 5 Pickles JO. Physiology of hearing. In: Scott-browns Otolaryngology. Michael Gleeson, George GB, Martin JB, Ray C, John H, Nicholas SJ. , et al editors. 7th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2008: 3181
- 6 Peake WT, Rosowski JJ, Lynch III TJ. Middle-ear transmission: acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human. Hear Res 1992; 57 (02) 245-268
- 7 Roland NJ, McRae RDR, Mc Combe AW. Chronic suppurative otitis media. In: Key topics in Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery. 2nd ed. Wales, Bios scientific publishers; 2001: 38-41
- 8 Pannu KK, Chadha S, Kumar D. , Preeti. Evaluation of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 63 (03) 208-213
- 9 Biswas SS, Hossain A, Alam M, Atiq T, Al-Amin Z. Hearing evaluation after myringoplasty. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 16 (01) 23-28
- 10 Nahata V, Patil CY, Patil RK, Gattani G, Disawal A, Roy A. Tympanic membrane Perforation: Its correlation with hearing loss and frequency affected - An analytical study. Indian J of Otology. 2014; 20 (01) 10-15
- 11 Ristovska L, Jachova Z, Filipovski R, Atanasovska N. Correlation between tympanic membrane perforation. JSER 2016; 17 (02) 36-49
- 12 Rafique M, Farrukh MS, Shaikh FS. Assessment of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation at tertiary care hospitals. JLUMHS 2014; 13 (01) 32-36
- 13 Park H, Hong SN, Kim HS. , et al. Determinants of conductive hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 8 (02) 92-96
- 14 Ahmad SW, Ramani GV. Hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol 1979; 93 (11) 1091-1098
- 15 Nepal A, Bhandary S, Mishra SC, Singh I, Kumar P. The morphology of central tympanic membrane perforations. Nepal Med Coll J 2007; 9 (04) 239-244
- 16 Ibekwe TS, Ijaduola GT, Nwaorgu OG. Tympanic membrane perforation among adults in West Africa. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28 (03) 348-352
- 17 McArdle FE, Tonndorf J. Perforations of the tympanic membrane and their effects upon middle-ear transmission. Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd 1968; 192 (02) 145-162
- 18 Bigelow DC, Swanson PB, Saunders JC. The effect of tympanic membrane perforation size on umbo velocity in the rat. Laryngoscope 1996; 106 (1 Pt 1): 71-76
- 19 Bhusal CL, Guragain RP, Shrivastav RP. Frequency dependence of hearing loss with perforations. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2007; 46 (168) 180-184
- 20 Al-Omari AF, Al-Doski FS. Effect of the size of tympanic membrane perforation on hearing. Tikrit J Pharma Sci. 2013; 9 (01) 154-161
- 21 Lerut B, Pfammatter A, Moons J, Linder T. Functional correlations of tympanic membrane perforation size. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33 (03) 379-386
- 22 Röösli C, Sim JH, Chatzimichalis M, Huber AM. How does closure of tympanic membrane perforations affect hearing and middle ear mechanics? An evaluation in a patient cohort and temporal bone models. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33 (03) 371-378
- 23 Austin DF. Sound conduction of the diseased ear. J Laryngol Otol 1978; 92 (05) 367-393