Neuropediatrics 2017; 48(02): 123-126
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598046
Short Communication
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Auditory Processing in Children with Migraine: A Controlled Study

Larissa Mendonça Agessi
1   Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Thaís Rodrigues Villa
2   Division of Investigation and Treatment of Headaches (DITH), Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Deusvenir de Souza Carvalho
2   Division of Investigation and Treatment of Headaches (DITH), Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Liliane Desgualdo Pereira
2   Division of Investigation and Treatment of Headaches (DITH), Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

26 August 2016

12 December 2016

Publication Date:
25 January 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background This study aimed to investigate central auditory processing performance in children with migraine and compared with controls without headache.

Methods Twenty-eight children of both sexes, aged between 8 and 12 years, diagnosed with migraine with and without aura, and a control group of the same age range and with no headache history, were included. Gaps-in-noise (GIN), duration pattern test (DPT), synthetic sentence identification (SSI) test, and nonverbal dichotic test (NVDT) were used to assess central auditory processing performance.

Results Children with migraine performed significantly worse in DPT, SSI test, and NVDT when compared with controls without headache; however, no significant differences were found in the GIN test.

Conclusions Children with migraine demonstrate impairment in the physiologic mechanism of temporal processing and selective auditory attention. In our short communication, migraine could be related to impaired central auditory processing in children.

Note

The study was financially supported by CNPQ—National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development.


The clinical trial registration and the name of the database where the trial was registered is Research Ethics Committee (CEP 415.593)—UNIFESP.


 
  • References

  • 1 Schoenen J. Neurophysiological features of the migrainous brain. Neurol Sci 2006; 27 (Suppl. 02) S77-S81
  • 2 Siniatchkin M, Kropp P, Neumann M, Gerber W, Stephani U. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine families. Pain 2000; 85 (01/02) 247-254
  • 3 Siniatchkin M, Jonas A, Baki H, van Baalen A, Gerber WD, Stephani U. Developmental changes of the contingent negative variation in migraine and healthy children. J Headache Pain 2010; 11 (2) 105-113
  • 4 Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N. Correlation between brainstem and cortical auditory processes in normal and language-impaired children. Brain 2005; 128 (Pt 2): 417-423
  • 5 ASHA—American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol 1996; 5 (2) 41-54
  • 6 Overath T, Kumar S, Stewart L , et al. Cortical mechanisms for the segregation and representation of acoustic textures. J Neurosci 2010; 30 (6) 2070-2076
  • 7 Ciriaco A, Russo A, Monzani D , et al. A preliminary study on the relationship between central auditory processing and childhood primary headaches in the intercritical phase. J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 69
  • 8 Headache Classification Subcomitte of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders (Third Edition) (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013; 33 (9) 629-808
  • 9 Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou DE, Baran JA, Zaida E. GIN (gaps-in-noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear 2005; 26 (6) 608-618
  • 10 Musiek FE, Baran JA, Pinheiro ML. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology 1990; 29 (6) 304-313
  • 11 Aquino AMCM, Almeida CIR, Oliveira JAA. Teste de identificação de sentenças sintéticas (SSI) em português com mensagem competitiva: uma padronização. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 1993; 59 (3) 160-163
  • 12 Ortiz KZ, Pereira LD. Teste não-verbal de escuta direcionada. In: Pereira LDe, Schochat E. Processamento Auditivo Central: manual de avaliação, 1ª edição. São Paulo, Brazil: Lovise; 1997: 231
  • 13 Pereira LD, Santos MFC, Ziliotto KN. Critérios de referência de adequação dos mecanismos fisiológicos do processamento auditivo. In: Pereira LD, Azevedo MF, Ziliotto KN, Machado LP, eds. Processamento auditivo—terapia fonoaudiológica. Uma abordagem de (re) habilitação. São Paulo, Brazil: Lovise. No prelo; 2005
  • 14 Valeriani M, Galli F, Tarantino S , et al. Correlation between abnormal brain excitability and emotional symptomatology in paediatric migraine. Cephalalgia 2009; 29 (2) 204-213
  • 15 Agessi LM, Villa TR, Dias KZ, Carvalho DdeS, Pereira LD, Pereira LD. Central auditory processing and migraine: a controlled study. J Headache Pain 2014; 15: 72