Download PDF
The Journal of Hip Surgery 2017; 01(01): 027-032
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597966
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Long-Term Results of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Stem in Patients with Femoral Head Osteonecrosis

Hyun-Ho Kim
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
,
Jung-Won Lim
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
,
Young-Bok Jung
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Center, Hyundae General Hospital, Namyangju, Korea
,
Young-Kyun Lee
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
,
Yong-Chan Ha
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
,
Kyung-Hoi Koo
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 March 2017 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Patients with femoral head osteonecrosis are younger and more active than those with osteoarthritis of the hip. More than 10-year results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using modular cementless stem in osteonecrotic patients have not yet been reported. We determined clinical and radiologic results of cementless modular stem in a consecutive series of patients with femoral head osteonecrosis a minimum follow-up of 10 years. We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients (58 hips) who underwent THA for femoral head osteonecrosis with a cementless modular femoral stem. Metal-on-metal articulation was used in 32 hips and ceramic-on-ceramic articulation in 26. There were 26 men and 22 women with a mean age of 52 years at the time of the operation. These patients were followed for 10 to 15 years. All of the acetabular cups and femoral stems had radiographic evidence of bone ingrown stability at the final follow-up. Three hips were revised due to infection. There were no revisions for ceramic fracture or adverse reaction to metal debris. The survival rate was 94.8% (95% confidence interval: 89.8–100%). However, 12 patients (12 hips, 21%) suffered thigh pain. In six patients (six hips), the pain disappeared within 1 to 2 years, whereas the pain persisted until the final follow-up in the remaining six patients. As of 10 to 15 year, radiologic results and survival of THA using a modular femoral stem were good in patients with osteonecrosis. However, the incidence of thigh pain remains a matter of concern.

Keywords

osteonecrosis - cementless total hip arthroplasty - S-ROM

Note

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.


Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.


 

  • References

  • 1 Cameron HU. Management of femoral deformities during the total hip replacement. Orthopedics 1996; 19 (9) 745-746
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Biant LC, Bruce WJ, Assini JB, Walker PM, Walsh WR. Primary total hip arthroplasty in severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. Ten-year results using a cementless modular stem. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (1) 27-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Trick LW , et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with use of the modular S-ROM prosthesis. Four to seven-year clinical and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81 (12) 1707-1716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Drexler M, Dwyer T, Marmor M , et al. Nineteen year results of THA using modular 9 mm S-ROM femoral component in patients with small femoral canals. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (9) 1667-1670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mehran N, North T, Laker M. Failure of a modular hip implant at the stem-sleeve interface. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (7) e978-e981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cornell CN, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM. Long-term follow-up of total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1985; 16 (4) 757-769
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing in young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (2) 218-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ha YC, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim TY, Koo KH. THA using an anatomic stem in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (5) 1141-1147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51 (4) 737-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Barrack RL, Paprosky W, Butler RA, Palafox A, Szuszczewicz E, Myers L. Patients' perception of pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (5) 590-596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (257) 107-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72 (4) 518-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Engh CA, Hooten Jr JP, Zettl-Schaffer KF , et al. Porous-coated total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (298) 89-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; (121) 20-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (141) 17-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley Jr LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55 (8) 1629-1632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kaplan EPM. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Imbuldeniya AM, Walter WK, Zicat BA, Walter WL. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (6) 730-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kang JS, Moon KH, Kim RS, Park SR, Lee JS, Shin SH. Total hip arthroplasty using S-ROM prosthesis for dysplastic hip. Yonsei Med J 2011; 52 (4) 655-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lim SJ, Park YS, Moon YW, Jung SM, Ha HC, Seo JG. Modular cementless total hip arthroplasty for multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (1) 77-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kim SM, Lim SJ, Moon YW, Kim YT, Ko KR, Park YS. Cementless modular total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis: minimum fifteen-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (3) 504-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yang S, Halim AY, Werner BC, Gwathmey FW, Cui Q. Does osteonecrosis of the femoral head increase surgical and medical complication rates after total hip arthroplasty? A comprehensive analysis in the United States. Hip Int 2015; 25 (3) 237-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Stavrakis AI, SooHoo NF, Lieberman JR. A comparison of the incidence of complications following total hip arthroplasty in patients with or without osteonecrosis. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (1) 114-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Chang JS, Han DJ, Park SK, Sung JH, Ha YC. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis after kidney transplantation. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (5) 824-827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Patterson JJ, Guerin J. Tapered titanium cementless total hip replacements: a 10- to 13-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (393) 112-120
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lavernia C, D'apuzzo M, Hernandez VH, Lee DJ. Patient-perceived outcomes in thigh pain after primary arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441 (441) 268-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69 (1) 45-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lavernia C, D'Apuzzo M, Hernandez V, Lee D. Thigh pain in primary total hip arthroplasty: the effects of elastic moduli. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (7, Suppl 2): 10-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Chen HH, Morrey BF, An KN, Luo ZP. Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (6) 945-950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Molli RG, Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR, Adams JB, Sneller MA. A short tapered stem reduces intraoperative complications in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (2) 450-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar