Differentiating Benign from Malignant Sinonasal Lesions: Feasibility of Diffusion Weighted MRI

Abstract

Introduction Appearance of nasal masses on routine CT and MRI are not pathognomonic. We utilized the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value obtained from diffusion weighted image (DWI) to detect the differences in the microstructures of tumor and non-tumor tissues.

Objective The objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic role of DWI and ADC values in differentiating between malignant and benign sinonasal lesions and its correlation with histopathological results as the reference standard.

Methods Patients with nasal and / or paranasal mass underwent CT, MRI, and DWI before any surgical intervention. We used diagnostic sinonasal endoscopy and biopsy to confirm the diagnosis after MRI.

Results When we used ADC value of (1.2 × 10–3 mm2/s) as a cut-off value for differentiating benign from malignant sinonasal lesions, we achieved 90% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, 88.4% specificity, 77.8% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. At this cut-off, benign lesions show statistically significant higher ADC value than malignant tumors.

Conclusion DW MRI and ADC value calculation are promising quantitative methods helping to differentiate between malignant and benign sinonasal lesions. Thus, they are effective methods compared with other conventional methods with short imaging time thus it is recommended to be incorporated into routine evaluations.

Keywords

MRI - nose - tumor - sinusitis - CT scan - magnetic resonance imaging

• References

• 1 Connor S, Hussain S, Woo E. Sinonasal imaging. Eur J Radiol 2007; 19: 39-54
• 2 Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F. , et al. Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220 (03) 621-630
• 3 Maeda M, Kato H, Sakuma H, Maier SE, Takeda K. Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient in line scan diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26 (05) 1186-1192
• 4 Barnes L, Brandwein M, Som PM. Diseases of the nose, paranasal sinuses, and nasopharynx,. in Barnes L. (ed): Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck (ed 2). New York, NY: Marcel Decker; 2001: 439-55
• 5 Loevner LA, Sonners AI. Imaging of neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2004; 14 (04) 625-646
• 6 Lyng H, Haraldseth O, Rofstad EK. Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43 (06) 828-836
• 7 Eggesbø HB. Radiological imaging of inflammatory lesions in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Eur Radiol 2006; 16 (04) 872-888
• 8 Madani G, Beale TJ. Sinonasal inflammatory disease. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2009; 30 (01) 17-24
• 9 Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000; 217 (02) 331-345
• 10 Sasaki M, Eida S, Sumi M, Nakamura T. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for sinonasal diseases: differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32 (06) 1100-1106
• 11 Sumi M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T. Diagnostic ability of apparent diffusion coefficients for lymphomas and carcinomas in the pharynx. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (10) 2631-2637
• 12 White ML, Zhang Y, Robinson RA. Evaluating tumors and tumorlike lesions of the nasal cavity, the paranasal sinuses, and the adjacent skull base with diffusion-weighted MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30 (03) 490-495
• 13 Razek AA, Sieza S, Maha B. Assessment of nasal and paranasal sinus masses by diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Neuroradiol 2009; 36 (04) 206-211
• 14 Sakamoto J, Yoshino N, Okochi K. , et al. Tissue characterization of head and neck lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging with SPLICE. Eur J Radiol 2009; 69 (02) 260-268