J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78(02): 158-163
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1594238
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

An Evaluation of Styloidectomy as an Adjunct or Alternative to Jugular Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Disturbances of Cranial Venous Outflow

J. Nicholas Higgins
1   Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Mathew R. Garnett
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
John D. Pickard
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Patrick R. Axon
3   Cambridge Skull Base Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 July 2016

30 September 2016

Publication Date:
23 November 2016 (online)

Abstract

Background The extent to which intracranial venous sinus obstruction contributes to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is debated. The extent to which extracranial venous obstruction contributes to IIH is virtually unexplored. This article describes an interventional approach to extracranial venous outflow in a group of patients with severe intractable symptoms.

Objective To describe our technique and experience of styloidectomy combined with jugular stenting in the treatment of skull base narrowing of the jugular veins.

Methods Retrospective review of all styloidectomies undertaken at our institution (n = 34), as an adjunct or alternative to jugular venous stenting, with a view to improving cranial venous outflow.

Results Eleven styloidectomies were for delayed complications of jugular stenting. Of seven with stent dysfunction, three were improved and four unchanged. Of seven with accessory nerve compression (three had both), four resolved and three improved. In 23 instances, styloidectomy preceded or obviated jugular stenting. Two had a virtual resolution of symptoms, 13 were improved, and 8 were unchanged.

Conclusion Styloidectomy can replace, salvage, or complement jugular venous stenting in IIH and disturbances of cranial venous outflow.

 
  • References

  • 1 Johnston I, Owler B, Pickard J. The Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2007
  • 2 Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2002; 59 (10) 1492-1495
  • 3 Fishman RA. The pathophysiology of pseudotumor cerebri. An unsolved puzzle. Arch Neurol 1984; 41 (3) 257-258
  • 4 King JO, Mitchell PJ, Thomson KR, Tress BM. Cerebral venography and manometry in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 1995; 45 (12) 2224-2228
  • 5 Karahalios DG, Rekate HL, Khayata MH, Apostolides PJ. Elevated intracranial venous pressure as a universal mechanism in pseudotumor cerebri of varying etiologies. Neurology 1996; 46 (1) 198-202
  • 6 King JO, Mitchell PJ, Thomson KR, Tress BM. Manometry combined with cervical puncture in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2002; 58 (1) 26-30
  • 7 Owler BK, Parker G, Halmagyi GM , et al. Cranial venous outflow obstruction and pseudotumor Cerebri syndrome. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2005; 30: 107-174
  • 8 Higgins JN, Owler BK, Cousins C, Pickard JD. Venous sinus stenting for refractory benign intracranial hypertension. Lancet 2002; 359 (9302): 228-230
  • 9 Higgins JN, Cousins C, Owler BK, Sarkies N, Pickard JD. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: 12 cases treated by venous sinus stenting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74 (12) 1662-1666
  • 10 Ahmed RM, Wilkinson M, Parker GD , et al. Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32 (8) 1408-1414
  • 11 Puffer RC, Mustafa W, Lanzino G. Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg 2013; 5 (5) 483-486
  • 12 Higgins N, Pickard J, Lever A. What do lumbar puncture and jugular venoplasty say about a connection between chronic fatigue syndrome and idiopathic intracranial hypertension?. EJMINT Original Article 2014; 1448000223 (24 November 2014)
  • 13 Dashti SR, Nakaji P, Hu YC , et al. Styloidogenic jugular venous compression syndrome: diagnosis and treatment: case report. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (3) E795-E799
  • 14 Higgins N, Trivedi R, Greenwood R, Pickard J. Brain slump caused by jugular venous stenoses treated by stenting: a hypothesis to link spontaneous intracranial hypotension with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Surg Rep 2015; 76 (1) e188-e193
  • 15 Jia LY, Hua Y, Ji XM, Liu JT. Correlation analysis of internal jugular vein abnormalities and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012; 125 (20) 3671-3674
  • 16 Diehn FE, Schwartz KM, Hunt CH , et al. Prevalence of incidental narrowing of the superior segment of the internal jugular vein in patients without multiple sclerosis. Clin Neuroradiol 2014; 24 (2) 121-127
  • 17 Eagle WW. Elongated styloid process: Report of two cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1937; 25 (5) 584-587
  • 18 Ceylan A, Köybaşioğlu A, Celenk F, Yilmaz O, Uslu S. Surgical treatment of elongated styloid process: experience of 61 cases. Skull Base 2008; 18 (5) 289-295
  • 19 David J, Lieb M, Rahimi SA. Stylocarotid artery syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60 (6) 1661-1663
  • 20 Strauss M, Zohar Y, Laurian N. Elongated styloid process syndrome: intraoral versus external approach for styloid surgery. Laryngoscope 1985; 95 (8) 976-979
  • 21 Chase DC, Zarmen A, Bigelow WC, McCoy JM. Eagle's syndrome: a comparison of intraoral versus extraoral surgical approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62 (6) 625-629