Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2016; 38(11): 531-537
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593894
Original Article
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Analysis of the Construct Validity and Internal Consistency of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State-Anxiety (S-Anxiety) Scale for Pregnant Women during Labor

Análise da validade de constructo e consistência interna da escala de estado de ansiedade (E-Ansiedade) do inventário de ansiedade traço-estado (Idate) para gestantes em trabalho de parto
Alexandre Magno Delgado
1   Obstetrics Center, Residência Integrada Multiprofissional em Saúde, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
,
Alessandra da Boaviagem Freire
2   Post-Graduation Program in Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
,
Elaine Lima Silva Wanderley
2   Post-Graduation Program in Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
,
Andrea Lemos
2   Post-Graduation Program in Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

03 February 2016

12 July 2016

Publication Date:
03 November 2016 (online)

Abstract

Purpose To analyze the internal consistency and the construct validity of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State-Anxiety (S-Anxiety) scale for pregnant women during labor.

Method A study of measurement property including 150 pregnant women aged between 15 and 45 years old, during the first period of labor and with term pregnancies. The questionnaire used was the STAI S-Anxiety scale. In order to assess the internal consistency, Cronbach's α was calculated through an exploratory factor analysis. The correlation between the factors was calculated using the Pearson coefficient. The state of significance used for this analysis was 0.05.

Results The STAI S-Anxiety scale used in the context of labor showed two factors represented as the absence (factor 1) and the presence of anxiety (factor 2); item 4 (“I regret it”) did not show a representative value. Both factors showed high indications of Cronbach's α, varying from 0.830 for factor 1, and 0.723 for factor 2. In the results of the Pearson coefficient between the two factors, a significant but weak correlation was observed (r = -0.188; p = 0.021).

Conclusion The STAI S-Anxiety scale used in pregnant women during labor presented appropriate values of internal consistency; however, item 3 did not show a significant factorial value. Therefore, this questionnaire must be applied cautiously and carefully without the use of the item 4 in the clinical practice and in researches about labor.

Resumo

Objetivo Analisar a consistência interna e validade de constructo da escala de estado de ansiedade do Inventário de ansiedade traço-estado (Idate) para gestantes em trabalho de parto.

Métodos Trata-se de um estudo de propriedades de medida incluindo 150 gestantes com idade entre 15 e 45 anos, no primeiro período de trabalho de parto e com gestação a termo. O questionário utilizado foi a escala estado de ansiedade do Idate. Para a avaliação da consistência interna, o alfa de Cronbach foi calculado por meio da análise fatorial exploratória. A correlação dos fatores foi realizada por correlação de Pearson. O nível de significância adotado para esta análise foi de 0,05.

Resultados Verificou-se que a escala estado do Idate no contexto de parto apresenta dois fatores, representados como ausência (fator 1) e presença de ansiedade (fator 2); o item 4 (“Estou arrependida”) não apresentou valor representativo. Ambos os fatores apresentaram índices altos de alfa de Cronbach, variando entre 0,830 para o fator 1 e 0,723 para o fator 2. Nos resultados da correlação de Pearson entre os dois fatores, foi observada uma correlação significativa, porém fraca (r = -0,188; p = 0,021).

Conclusões A escala de estado de ansiedade do Idate utilizada em gestantes durante o trabalho de parto apresentou valores de consistência interna adequados, porém o item 4 não apresentou valor fatorial representativo. Portanto, a utilização desse questionário na prática clínica e em pesquisas sobre o parto deve ser realizado sem a utilização do item 4 de maneira cautelosa e criteriosa.

Note

We report no conflicts of interest.


 
  • References

  • 1 Brüggemann OM, Parpinelli MA, Osis MJD. Evidence on support during labor and delivery: a literature review. Cad Saude Publica 2005; 21 (5) 1316-1327
  • 2 Manozi SR, de Carvalho EC, dos Santos CB. Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis labor pain. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2013; 21: 88-96
  • 3 Spice K, Jones SL, Hadjistavropoulos HD, Kowalyk K, Stewart SH. Prenatal fear of childbirth and anxiety sensitivity. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 30 (3) 168-174
  • 4 Holm L, Fitzmaurice L. Emergency department waiting room stress: can music or aromatherapy improve anxiety scores?. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24 (12) 836-838
  • 5 Alipour Z, Lamyian M, Hajizadeh E. Anxiety and fear of childbirth as predictors of postnatal depression in nulliparous women. Women Birth 2012; 25 (3) e37-e43
  • 6 Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186 (5) , Suppl Nature ) S160-S172
  • 7 Landolt AS, Milling LS. The efficacy of hypnosis as an intervention for labor and delivery pain: a comprehensive methodological review. Clin Psychol Rev 2011; 31 (6) 1022-1031
  • 8 Arun CP. Fight or flight, forbearance and fortitude: the spectrum of actions of the catecholamines and their cousins. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004; 1018: 137-140
  • 9 Balaskas J. Parto ativo: guia prático para o parto natural. São Paulo Ground: 1993
  • 10 Busch V, Magerl W, Kern U, Haas J, Hajak G, Eichhammer P. The effect of deep and slow breathing on pain perception, autonomic activity, and mood processing--an experimental study. Pain Med 2012; 13 (2) 215-228
  • 11 Azevedo PBD, Kaipper MB, Fumegalli EB, Chachamovich E, Caumo W. Proposta de simplificação do inventário de ansiedade traço-estado (IDATE) através da análise da psicométrica clássica e modelo de Rasch. Rev HCPA. 2008; 28 (Suppl): 304-305
  • 12 Grimstad H, Schei B, Backe B, Jacobsen G. Anxiety, physical abuse, and low birth weight. Scand J Public Health 1999; 27 (4) 296-300
  • 13 Almeida NAM, de Sousa JT, Bachion MM, Silveira NdeA. The use of respiration and relaxation techniques for pain and anxiety relief in the parturition process. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2005; 13 (1) 52-58
  • 14 Baptista MN, Baptista ASD, Torres ECR. Associação entre suporte social, depressão e ansiedade em gestantes. Psic. 2006; 7 (1) 39-48
  • 15 Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. STAI: manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Invetory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists; 1970
  • 16 Biaggio AMB, Natalício L, Spielberger CD. Desenvolvimento da forma experimental em português do Inventário de Ansiedade Traço-Estado (IDATE) de Spielberger. Arq Bras Psicol Apl. 1977; 29 (3) 31-44
  • 17 Cattell RB, Scheier IH. The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety. New York: Ronald Press; 1961
  • 18 Gorenstein C, Andrade L. Validation of a Portuguese version of the Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Brazilian subjects. Braz J Med Biol Res 1996; 29 (4) 453-457
  • 19 Gorenstein C, Pompéia S, Andrade L. Scores of Brazilian University students on the Beck Depression and the State Trait Anxiety Inventories. Psychol Rep 1995; 77 (2) 635-641
  • 20 Gorenstein C, Andrade L, Vieira Filho AH, Tung TC, Artes R. Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Beck Depression Inventory on Brazilian college students. J Clin Psychol 1999; 55 (5) 553-562
  • 21 Andrade L, Gorenstein C, Vieira Filho AH, Tung TC, Artes R. Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory applied to college students: factor analysis and relation to the Beck Depression Inventory. Braz J Med Biol Res 2001; 34 (3) 367-374
  • 22 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001
  • 23 Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res 1966; 1 (1) 245-276
  • 24 Bõing I, Sperandio FF, Santos GM. Uso de técnica respiratória para analgesia no parto. Femina 2007; 35 (1) 41-46
  • 25 Namazi M, Amir Ali Akbari S, Mojab F, Talebi A, Alavi Majd H, Jannesari S. Aromatherapy with citrus aurantium oil and anxiety during the first stage of labor. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16 (6) e18371
  • 26 Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment 1995; 7 (3) 286-299
  • 27 Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford; 2006
  • 28 Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park: Sage; 1979
  • 29 Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16 (3) 297-334
  • 30 Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 2012; 21 (4) 651-657
  • 31 Pasquali L, Pinelli Júnior B, Solha AC. Contribuição à validação e normalização da escala de ansiedade traço-estado do IDATE. Psicol, Teor Pesq 1994; 10 (3) 411-420
  • 32 Fioravanti ACM, Santos LF, Maissonette S, Cruz APM, Landeira-Fernandez J. Avaliação da estrutura fatorial da escala de ansiedade-traço do IDATE. Aval Psicol 2006; 5 (2) 217-224
  • 33 Tedesco RP, Maia Filho NL, Mathias L , et al. [Primigravid expectations about the delivery method and the causal factors for their choice]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2004; 26 (10) 791-798 Portuguese
  • 34 Velho MB, Santos EKA, Brüggemann OM, Camargo BV. Vivência do parto normal ou cesáreo: revisão integrativa sobre a percepção de mulheres. Texto Contexto Enferm 2012; 21 (2) 458-466
  • 35 Miranda DB, Bortolon FCS, Matão MEL, Campos PHF. Parto normal e cesária: representações de mulheres que vivenciaram as duas experiências. Rev Eletr Enferm. 2008; 10 (2) 337-346
  • 36 Gama AdeS, Giffin KM, Angulo-Tuesta A, Barbosa GP, d'Orsi E. Women's representations and experiences with vaginal and cesarean delivery in public and private maternity hospitals. Cad Saude Publica 2009; 25 (11) 2480-2488
  • 37 Callister LC, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Lauri S. Giving birth. Perceptions of Finnish childbearing women. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2001; 26 (1) 28-32
  • 38 McCallum C, dos Reis AP. Re-signifying pain, overcoming loneliness: childbirth experiences among working-class adolescents in a public maternity hospital in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2006; 22 (7) 1483-1491
  • 39 Hair Jr JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006
  • 40 Correia LL, Linhares MBM. Maternal anxiety in the pre- and postnatal period: a literature review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2007; 15 (4) 677-683
  • 41 Byatt N, Hicks-Courant K, Davidson A , et al. Depression and anxiety among high-risk obstetric inpatients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2014; 36 (6) 644-649
  • 42 Lynch CE, Magann EF, Barringer SN , et al. Pet therapy program for antepartum high-risk pregnancies: a pilot study. J Perinatol 2014; 34 (11) 816-818