Prefabricated Flaps: Identification of Microcirculation Structure and Supercharging Technique Improving Survival Area

Abstract

Background Microcirculation is an important factor frequently overlooked when studying the survival of prefabricated flaps. In the current study, we use different prefabrication techniques for characterizing microcirculation within the flap, with the goal of finding an effective way to improve its survival area.

Methods An abdominal prefabricated flap rodent model was created using a two-stage operation. All rats were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10/group): group A, prefabricated femoral vessels; group B, prefabricated femoral artery with a connected superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV); group C, connected superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) with a prefabricated femoral vein; group D was similar to group A along with a prefabricated SIEA, and group E was similar to group A along with a prefabricated SIEV; and group F acted as a control group and consisted of an axial flap nourished by superficial inferior epigastric vessels. Flaps were assessed for survival area, blood perfusion area, and capillary density using macroscopic analysis, near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIFI), and histology.

Results The survival area was not significantly different when comparing groups B to C, and D to E. The survival area of groups D and E was larger than that of groups B and C. Groups B through E had a smaller survival area in comparison to group F and a larger survival area than group A. NIFI were consistent with the macroscopic outcomes. The capillary density was not significantly different between groups A to C and groups D to F.

Conclusion Both arterial and venous supercharging could potentially improve the survival area of prefabricated flaps.

Keywords

prefabricated flaps - microcirculation - supercharging

^* Both the authors contributed equally to this study.

• References

• 1 Li JN, Hu Y. A review of the experimental study and clinical application of the prefabricated flap. Eur J Plast Surg 2001; 24: 271-274
• 2 Pribaz JJ, Fine N, Orgill DP. Flap prefabrication in the head and neck: a 10-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (3) 808-820
• 3 Xu H, Zhang Z, Tao W , et al. Ex vivo delay: a novel approach to increase prefabricated flaps survival rate. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (8) 632-638
• 4 Hoang NT, Kloeppel M, Werner J, Staudenmaier R, Biemer E. Proposed new method for angiographically quantifying neovascularization in prefabricated flaps. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (3) 220-226
• 5 Chang H, Minn KW, Imanishi N, Minabe T, Nakajima H. Effect of venous superdrainage on a four-territory skin flap survival in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (7) 2046-2051
• 6 Chang H, Nobuaki I, Minabe T, Nakajima H. Comparison of three different supercharging procedures in a rat skin flap model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (1) 277-283
• 7 Li GS, Zan T, Li QF , et al. Internal mammary artery perforator-supercharged prefabricated cervicothoracic flap for face and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75 (1) 29-33
• 8 Guo L, Pribaz JJ. Clinical flap prefabrication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (6, Suppl): e340-e350
• 9 Sasaki GH, Pang CY. Pathophysiology of skin flaps raised on expanded pig skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74 (1) 59-67
• 10 Nguyen TH, Kloeppel M, Staudenmaier R, Schurr C, Burghartz M, Hoehnke C. Comparison of effective use of implanted vascular pedicles for skin flap prefabrication: an experimental study. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (2) 209-216