AJP Rep 2016; 06(04): e359-e366
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593605
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Categorizing Fetal Heart Rate Variability with and without Visual Aids

Amanda J. Ashdown
1   Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia
,
Mark W. Scerbo
1   Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia
,
Lee A. Belfore II
2   Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia
,
Stephen S. Davis
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
,
Alfred Z. Abuhamad
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

12 July 2016

02 September 2016

Publication Date:
06 October 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objective This study examined the ability of clinicians to correctly categorize images of fetal heart rate (FHR) variability with and without the use of exemplars.

Study Design A sample of 33 labor and delivery clinicians inspected static FHR images and categorized them into one of four categories defined by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) based on the amount of variability within absent, minimal, moderate, or marked ranges. Participants took part in three conditions: two in which they used exemplars representing FHR variability near the center or near the boundaries of each range, and a third control condition with no exemplars. The data gathered from clinicians were compared with those from a previous study using novices.

Results Clinicians correctly categorized more images when the FHR variability fell near the center rather than the boundaries of each range, F (1,32) = 71.69, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.69. They also correctly categorized more images when exemplars were available, F (2,64) = 5.44, p = 0.007, partial η2 = 0.15. Compared with the novices, the clinicians were more accurate and quicker in their category judgments, but this difference was limited to the condition without exemplars.

Conclusion The results suggest that categorizing FHR variability is more difficult when the examples fall near the boundaries of each NICHD-defined range. Thus, clinicians could benefit from training with visual aids to improve judgments about FHR variability and potentially enhance safety in labor and delivery.

 
  • References

  • 1 Freeman RK. Problems with intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation and patient management. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100 (4) 813-826
  • 2 Menihan CA, Zottoli EK. Electronic Fetal Monitoring: Concepts and Applications. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 2001
  • 3 Sweha A, Hacker TW, Nuovo J. Interpretation of the electronic fetal heart rate during labor. Am Fam Physician 1999; 59 (9) 2487-2500
  • 4 Macones GA, Hankins GDV, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (3) 661-666
  • 5 Figueras F, Albela S, Bonino S , et al. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome. J Perinat Med 2005; 33 (3) 241-245
  • 6 Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106 (12) 1307-1310
  • 7 Ashby FG, Boynton G, Lee WW. Categorization response time with multidimensional stimuli. Percept Psychophys 1994; 55 (1) 11-27
  • 8 Das-Smaal EA, De Swart JH. Variation within categories. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1984; 57: 165-192
  • 9 Das-Smaal EA, De Swart JH. Effects of contrasting category, conjoint frequency and typicality on categorization. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1986; 62: 15-40
  • 10 Kok EM, de Bruin AB, Robben SG, van Merriënboer JJ. Learning radiological appearances of diseases: does comparison help?. Learn Instr 2013; 23: 90-97
  • 11 Kurtz KJ, Gentner D. Detecting anomalous features in complex stimuli: the role of structured comparison. J Exp Psychol Appl 2013; 19 (3) 219-232
  • 12 Wickens CD, Hollands JG. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2000
  • 13 Gentner D, Gunn V. Structural alignment facilitates the noticing of differences. Mem Cognit 2001; 29 (4) 565-577
  • 14 Markman AB, Gentner D. The effects of alignability on memory. Psychol Sci 1997; 8 (5) 363-367
  • 15 Ashdown AJ, Scerbo MW, Belfore II LA, Abuhamad AZ, Davis SS. Categorizing fetal heart rate variability with and without visual aids. In: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of Human Factors & Ergonomics Society; October 26–30, 2015; Los Angeles, CA
  • 16 Belfore II LA, Scerbo MW, Anderson BL. A fetal heart rate monitor simulator. Virginia Beach, VA: ModSim World; 2007
  • 17 Vandierendonck A. Concept learning, memory and transfer of dot pattern categories. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1984; 55 (1) 71-88
  • 18 Chaney FB, Teel KS. Improving inspector performance through training and visual aids. J Appl Psychol 1967; 51 (4) 311-315
  • 19 Hall LM, Hannon DJ, Leisk GG, Wolfberg AJ, House MD. Measurement of fetal heart rate variability on an electronic monitor using a prototype electronic ruler. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29 (6) 409-413
  • 20 Loft S, Smith RE, Remington RW. Minimizing the disruptive effects of prospective memory in simulated air traffic control. J Exp Psychol Appl 2013; 19 (3) 254-265
  • 21 Gunn DV, Warm JS, Nelson WT, Bolia RS, Schumsky DA, Corcoran KJ. Target acquisition with UAVs: vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces. Hum Factors 2005; 47 (3) 488-497
  • 22 Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Ogden WC. Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In: Pick H, Saltzmann E, , eds. Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1978: 137-157
  • 23 Posner MI, Snyder CR, Davidson BJ. Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol 1980; 109 (2) 160-174
  • 24 Hahn U, Bailey TM, Elvin LB. Effects of category diversity on learning, memory, and generalization. Mem Cognit 2005; 33 (2) 289-302
  • 25 Balslev T, Jarodzka H, Holmqvist K , et al. Visual expertise in paediatric neurology. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2012; 16 (2) 161-166
  • 26 Klein GA, Hoffman RR. Seeing the invisible: Perceptual-cognitive aspects of expertise. In: Rabinowitz M, , ed. Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1993: 203-226
  • 27 Lowe DG. Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition. Boston, MA: Kluwer; 1985
  • 28 Kennedy RA, Anderson-Montoya BL, Scerbo MW , et al. The influence of visual aids on detecting early and late decelerations in maternal-fetal heart rate patterns. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of Human Factors & Ergonomics Society; October 22–26, 2012; Boston, MA; 2012: 1317-1321
  • 29 Wertheimer M. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In: Ellis WD, , ed. A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. London, United kingdom: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company; 1938: 71-88