J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78(02): 139-144
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593438
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Single Layer Repair of Large Anterior Skull Base Defects without Vascularized Mucosal Flap

Frederick Yoo
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Marilene B. Wang
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Marvin Bergsneider
2   Department of Neurosurgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Jeffrey D. Suh
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 July 2016

22 August 2016

Publication Date:
18 October 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objectives Bilateral anterior skull base (ASB) defects following endoscopic endonasal tumor resection are most commonly repaired utilizing multilayered reconstruction with a vascularized mucosal flap. Single-layer closure of large ASB defects has been described in the literature but this technique has yet to gain a widespread use. We report our experience with a series of patients who underwent reconstruction of large ASB defects using a single-layer intradural graft, without nasoseptal flaps. We also compared the use of acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm, LifeCell, Branchburg, New Jersey, United States) or collagen matrix xenograft (Duramatrix, Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States) as the graft biomaterial.

Design A retrospective case series.

Setting Tertiary academic medical center.

Main Outcome Measures Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, the number of postoperative debridements, the number of postoperative infections, and time to remucosalization.

Results Two patients were reconstructed with AlloDerm and three with Duramatrix, with all patients receiving postoperative external beam radiation. There were no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks identified in these patients during follow-up. The AlloDerm group showed increased postsurgical crusting, the number of clinically apparent postoperative infections, and an increased time to remucosalization.

Conclusions Single-layer repair without a vascularized mucosal flap is a viable method of skull base repair for large ASB defects. We found repair with Duramatrix was superior, with less graft crusting and infection, requiring fewer debridements.

 
  • References

  • 1 Zuniga MG, Turner JH, Chandra RK. Updates in anterior skull base reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 24 (1) 75-82
  • 2 Suh JD, Ramakrishnan VR, Chi JJ, Palmer JN, Chiu AG. Outcomes and complications of endoscopic approaches for malignancies of the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013; 122 (1) 54-59
  • 3 Chin D, Harvey RJ. Endoscopic reconstruction of frontal, cribiform and ethmoid skull base defects. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 74: 104-118
  • 4 Patel MR, Stadler ME, Snyderman CH , et al. How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations. Skull Base 2010; 20 (6) 397-404
  • 5 Eloy JA, Patel SK, Shukla PA, Smith ML, Choudhry OJ, Liu JK. Triple-layer reconstruction technique for large cribriform defects after endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior skull base tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013; 3 (3) 204-211
  • 6 Clavenna MJ, Turner JH, Chandra RK. Pedicled flaps in endoscopic skull base reconstruction: review of current techniques. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 23 (1) 71-77
  • 7 Germani RM, Vivero R, Herzallah IR, Casiano RR. Endoscopic reconstruction of large anterior skull base defects using acellular dermal allograft. Am J Rhinol 2007; 21 (5) 615-618
  • 8 Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Rioja E, Enseñat J , et al. Management of anterior skull base defect depending on its size and location. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 346873
  • 9 Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (2) 452-459
  • 10 Eloy JA, Shukla PA, Choudhry OJ, Singh R, Liu JK. Assessment of frontal lobe sagging after endoscopic endonasal transcribriform resection of anterior skull base tumors: is rigid structural reconstruction of the cranial base defect necessary?. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (12) 2652-2657
  • 11 Battaglia P, Turri-Zanoni M, Castelnuovo P, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. Brain herniation after endoscopic transnasal resection of anterior skull base malignancies. Neurosurgery 2015; 11 (Suppl. 03) 457-462 , discussion 462
  • 12 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
  • 13 Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM. Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: a new method for endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (1) 13-18
  • 14 Patel MR, Taylor RJ, Hackman TG , et al. Beyond the nasoseptal flap: outcomes and pearls with secondary flaps in endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (4) 846-852
  • 15 Hanson M, Patel PM, Betz C, Olson S, Panizza B, Wallwork B. Sinonasal outcomes following endoscopic anterior skull base surgery with nasoseptal flap reconstruction: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129 (Suppl. 03) S41-S46
  • 16 Pant H, Bhatki AM, Snyderman CH , et al. Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20 (1) 35-40