Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30(01): 016-021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593431
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Medical Management of Rectal Prolapse

Jamie A. Cannon
1   Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 December 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Full-thickness rectal prolapse, or procidentia, is the passage of the full-thickness wall of the rectum beyond the anal sphincters. This condition results in pain and fecal incontinence which greatly impairs the quality of life of those afflicted. It is associated with several anatomic abnormalities, including decreased anal sphincter tone, levator muscle diastasis, and a deep anterior cul-de-sac. The diagnosis of rectal prolapse is made based on physical examination, although several other modalities are used to provide additional information about the patients' condition. While medical management of rectal prolapse can be effective in some cases, the mainstay of management of rectal prolapse is surgical correction.

Keywords

rectal prolapse - procidentia
 

  • References

  • 1 Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 2005; 94 (3) 207-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Corman ML. Rectal prolapse, solitary rectal ulcer, syndrome of the descending perineum, and rectocele. In: Colon and Rectal Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004: 1408
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Marceau C, Parc Y, Debroux E, Tiret E, Parc R. Complete rectal prolapse in young patients: psychiatric disease a risk factor of poor outcome. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7 (4) 360-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wassef R, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Rectal prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 1986; 23 (6) 397-451
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Madoff RD, Mellgren A. One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42 (4) 441-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wallenhorst T, Bouguen G, Brochard C , et al. Long-term impact of full-thickness rectal prolapse treatment on fecal incontinence. Surgery 2015; 158 (1) 104-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Woods R, Voyvodic F, Schloithe AC, Sage MR, Wattchow DA. Anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5 (6) 544-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Köhler A, Athanasiadis S. The value of posterior levator repair in the treatment of anorectal incontinence due to rectal prolapse—a clinical and manometric study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001; 386 (3) 188-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brodén G, Dolk A, Holmström B. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988; 3 (1) 23-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M. Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992; 7 (1) 8-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sainio AP, Voutilainen PE, Husa AI. Recovery of anal sphincter function following transabdominal repair of rectal prolapse: cause of improved continence?. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34 (9) 816-821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, MacGregor AB. Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram. Br J Surg 1992; 79 (5) 439-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bounovas A, Polychronidis A, Laftsidis P, Simopoulos C. Sigmoid colon cancer presenting as complete rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9 (7) 665-666
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Renzi A, Izzo D, Di Sarno G , et al. Cinedefecographic findings in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. A study in 420 cases. Minerva Chir 2006; 61 (6) 493-499
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brodén B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 1968; 11 (5) 330-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hotouras A, Murphy J, Boyle DJ, Allison M, Williams NS, Chan CL. Assessment of female patients with rectal intussusception and prolapse: is this a progressive spectrum of disease?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (6) 780-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ahmad AN, Hainsworth A, Williams AB, Schizas AM. A review of functional pelvic floor imaging modalities and their effectiveness. Clin Imaging 2015; 39 (4) 559-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Thapar RB, Patankar RV, Kamat RD, Thapar RR, Chemburkar V. MR defecography for obstructed defecation syndrome. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2015; 25 (1) 25-30
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Dietz DW. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49 (7) 1052-1058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Birnbaum EH, Stamm L, Rafferty JF, Fry RD, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency influences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (11) 1215-1221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 https://www.fascrs.org/patients/disease-condition/rectal-prolapse
    PubMed
  • 22 Cunin D, Siproudhis L, Desfourneaux V , et al. No surgery for full-thickness rectal prolapse: what happens with continence?. World J Surg 2013; 37 (6) 1297-1302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar