Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30(01): 057-062
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593426
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Abdominal Approaches to Rectal Prolapse

Kyla Joubert
1   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
,
Jonathan A. Laryea
1   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 December 2016 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Rectal prolapse is a debilitating condition with a complex etiology. Symptoms are most commonly prolapse of the rectum and pain with bowel movements or straining, with worsening fecal incontinence over time due to progressive stretching of the anal sphincters. Physical findings are fairly consistent from patient to patient—most notably diastasis of the levator ani muscles, deep pouch of Douglas, redundant sigmoid colon, a mobile mesorectum, and occasionally a solitary rectal ulcer. Evaluation includes a physical exam or imaging demonstrating the prolapse, and evaluating for other causes of pelvic floor dysfunction. Multiple surgical repairs are available, but treatment must be individualized based on patient symptoms and the presence or absence of constipation or other pelvic floor disorders. Mesh repairs have shown promising results, but carry the added risks of mesh erosion, infection, and mesh migration. The optimal repair has not been clearly demonstrated at this time.

Keywords

rectal prolapse - rectopexy - mesh repair - laparoscopy
 

  • References

  • 1 Caddy A. IV. Complete rectal prolapse treated by ventro-fixation of the rectum. Ann Surg 1895; 21 (2) 153-156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Felt-Bersma RJ, Tiersma ES, Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, and enterocele. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008; 37 (3) 645-668 , ix
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD ; Standards Practice Task Force of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (11) 1339-1346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Yoon SG. Rectal prolapse: review according to the personal experience. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2011; 27 (3) 107-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Leal VM, Regadas FS, Regadas SM, Veras LR. Clinical and functional evaluation of patients with rectocele and mucosal prolapse treated with transanal repair of rectocele and rectal mucosectomy with a single circular stapler (TRREMS). Tech Coloproctol 2010; 14 (4) 329-335
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Jacobs LK, Lin YJ, Orkin BA. The best operation for rectal prolapse. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77 (1) 49-70
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Womack NR, Williams NS, Holmfield JH, Morrison JF. Pressure and prolapse—the cause of solitary rectal ulceration. Gut 1987; 28 (10) 1228-1233
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ripstein CB, Lanter B. Etiology and surgical therapy of massive prolapse of the rectum. Ann Surg 1963; 157 (2) 259-264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Marceau C, Parc Y, Debroux E, Tiret E, Parc R. Complete rectal prolapse in young patients: psychiatric disease a risk factor of poor outcome. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7 (4) 360-365
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cunin D, Siproudhis L, Desfourneaux V , et al. No surgery for full-thickness rectal prolapse: what happens with continence?. World J Surg 2013; 37 (6) 1297-1302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Parés D, Vial M, Grande L. An alternative management for high-risk patients with rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11 (5) 531-532
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Devesa JM, Hervás PL, Vicente R , et al. Anal encirclement with a simple prosthetic sling for faecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15 (1) 17-22
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008; (4) CD001758
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Miles WE. Recto-sigmoidectomy as a method of treatment for procidentia recti. Proc R Soc Med 1933; 26 (11) 1445-1448
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J. Nineteen years' experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Ann Surg 1971; 173 (6) 993-1006
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Muir E. The surgical treatment of severe rectal prolapse. Proc R Soc Med 1959; 52 (Suppl. 01) 104-105
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse. Proc R Soc Med 1959; 52 (8) 602-603
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Loygue J, Nordlinger B, Cunci O, Malafosse M, Huguet C, Parc R. Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Report of 257 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27 (6) 356-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (11) 1500-1505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Frykman HM. Abdominal proctopexy and primary sigmoid resection for rectal procidentia. Am J Surg 1955; 90 (5) 780-789
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ramage L, Georgiou P, Tekkis P, Tan E. Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (7) 381-389
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 van Geluwe B, Wolthuis A, Penninckx F, D'Hoore A. Lessons learned after more than 400 laparoscopic ventral rectopexies. Acta Chir Belg 2013; 113 (2) 103-106
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 2005; 140 (1) 63-73
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Elagili F, Gurland B, Liu X, Church J, Ozuner G. Comparing perineal repairs for rectal prolapse: Delorme versus Altemeier. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (9) 521-525
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 1991; 78 (12) 1431-1433
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Mollen RM, Kuijpers JH, van Hoek F. Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (9) 1283-1287
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Heah SM, Hartley JE, Hurley J, Duthie GS, Monson JR. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (5) 638-643
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Hsu A, Brand MI, Saclarides TJ. Laparoscopic rectopexy without resection: a worthwhile treatment for rectal prolapse in patients without prior constipation. Am Surg 2007; 73 (9) 858-861
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kessler H, Jerby BL, Milsom JW. Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Surg Endosc 1999; 13 (9) 858-861
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Liyanage CA, Rathnayake G, Deen KI. A new technique for suture rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 2009; 13 (1) 27-31 , discussion 32–33
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Magruder JT, Efron JE, Wick EC, Gearhart SL. Laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse to reduce surgical-site infections and length of stay. World J Surg 2013; 37 (5) 1110-1114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T , et al. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (10) 1930-1940
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Safar B, Vernava III AM. Abdominal approaches for rectal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008; 21 (2) 94-99
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Laubert T, Kleemann M, Roblick UJ , et al. Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17 (3) 307-314
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Van Geluwe B, Wolthuis A, D'Hoore A. Laparoscopy for pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 28 (1) 69-80
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse: early and medium follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41 (1) 46-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Xynos E, Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Epanomeritakis E, Vassilakis JS. Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 1999; 13 (9) 862-864
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Tsiaoussis J, Chrysos E, Athanasakis E , et al. Rectoanal intussusception: presentation of the disorder and late results of resection rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (4) 838-844
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Himpens J, Cadière GB, Bruyns J, Vertruyen M. Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells. Surg Endosc 1999; 13 (2) 139-141
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Miyo M, Takemasa I, Mokutani Y , et al. Single-incision laparoscopic rectopexy (Wells) with simultaneous sigmoidectomy in a case of complete rectal prolapse and a sigmoid tumor: report of a case. Surg Today 2015; 45 (6) 793-798
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 D'Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 2006; 20 (12) 1919-1923
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Douard R, Frileux P, Brunel M, Attal E, Tiret E, Parc R. Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (8) 1089-1096
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Portier G, Kirzin S, Cabarrot P, Queralto M, Lazorthes F. The effect of abdominal ventral rectopexy on faecal incontinence and constipation in patients with internal intra-anal rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13 (8) 914-917
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Gomes-Ferreira C, Schneider A, Philippe P, Lacreuse I, Becmeur F. Laparoscopic modified Orr-Loygue mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse in children. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (2) 353-355
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Franklin Jr ME, Treviño JM, Portillo G, Vela I, Glass JL, González JJ. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (9) 1941-1946
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G , et al. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21 (11) 1413-1431
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Sileri P, Capuano I, Franceschilli L, Giorgi F, Gaspari AL. Modified laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18 (6) 591-594
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Ogilvie Jr JW, Stevenson AR, Powar M. Case-matched series of a non-cross-linked biologic versus non-absorbable mesh in laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29 (12) 1477-1483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Calişkan C, Denizli A, Makay O , et al. Experimental comparison of meshes for rectal prolapse surgery. Eur Surg Res 2009; 43 (3) 310-314
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994; 81 (6) 904-906
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Karas JR, Uranues S, Altomare DF , et al; Rectal Prolapse Recurrence Study Group. No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (1) 29-34
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Sahoo MR, Thimmegowda AK, Gowda MS. A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy. J Minim Access Surg 2014; 10 (1) 18-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Lee SH, Lakhtaria P, Canedo J, Lee YS, Wexner SD. Outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy for full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (8) 2699-2702
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Marchal F, Bresler L, Ayav A , et al. Long-term results of Delorme's procedure and Orr-Loygue rectopexy to treat complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (9) 1785-1790
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12 (6) 504-512
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Tranchart H, Valverde A, Goasguen N, Gravié JF, Mosnier H. Conservative treatment of intrarectal mesh migration after ventral laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28 (11) 1563-1566
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Badrek-Amoudi AH, Roe T, Mabey K, Carter H, Mills A, Dixon AR. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a cause for optimism?. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (5) 575-581
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar