Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 37(05): 689-707
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592187
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: How to Minimize Harm

Igor Barjaktarevic
1   Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Immunology, and Allergy, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
,
Doug Arenberg
2   Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
,
Brandon S. Grimes
1   Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Immunology, and Allergy, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
,
Kathleen Ruchalski
3   Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
,
Denise R. Aberle
3   Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
4   Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 October 2016 (online)

Abstract

Each year, more than 1 million persons worldwide are found to have a lung nodule that carries a risk of being malignant. In reality, the vast majority of lung nodules are benign, whether identified by screening or incidentally. The consequences of delaying or missing the diagnosis of lung cancer can be substantial, as can be the consequences of invasive procedures on patients with benign lung nodules. The challenge for the clinician caring for these patients is to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules with the least harm possible. In this review, we will discuss management strategies of the indeterminate pulmonary nodule and will review recent advances and harm-reduction strategies.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 2008; 246 (3) 697-722
  • 2 Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR , et al. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013; 143 (5, Suppl): e93S-e120S
  • 3 Wahidi MM, Govert JA, Goudar RK, Gould MK, McCrory DC ; American College of Chest Physicians. Evidence for the treatment of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007; 132 (3, Suppl): 94S-107S
  • 4 Ost DE, Gould MK. Decision making in patients with pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185 (4) 363-372
  • 5 Patel VK, Naik SK, Naidich DP , et al. A practical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules: part 1: radiologic characteristics and imaging modalities. Chest 2013; 143 (3) 825-839
  • 6 MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G , et al; Fleischner Society. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005; 237 (2) 395-400
  • 7 Gould MK, Tang T, Liu IL , et al. Recent trends in the identification of incidental pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192 (10) 1208-1214
  • 8 Moyer VA. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160 (5) 330-338
  • 9 Wiener RS, Gould MK, Arenberg DA , et al; ATS/ACCP Committee on Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice. An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192 (7) 881-891
  • 10 Silvestri GA. Bronchoscopy for the solitary pulmonary nodule: friend or foe?. Chest 2012; 142 (2) 276-277
  • 11 Skouras VS, Tanner NT, Silvestri GA. Diagnostic approach to the solitary pulmonary nodule. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 34 (6) 762-769
  • 12 Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP , et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169 (22) 2071-2077
  • 13 Smith-Bindman R. Is computed tomography safe?. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (1) 1-4
  • 14 Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E , et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA 2012; 307 (22) 2400-2409
  • 15 Lillington GA. Management of solitary pulmonary nodules. How to decide when resection is required. Postgrad Med 1997; 101 (3) 145-150
  • 16 U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2012 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/pdf/uscs_factsheet.pdf . Accessed on August 31, 2016.
  • 17 Key statistics for lung cancer. American Cancer Society. Available at http://www.cancer.org/ . Accessed on July 29, 2016
  • 18 Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (22) 2277-2284
  • 19 Karamat MI. Strategies and scientific basis of dose reduction on state-of-the-art multirow detector X-ray CT systems. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2015; 43 (1) 33-59
  • 20 Yu L, Liu X, Leng S , et al. Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 2009; 1 (1) 65-84
  • 21 Boskovic T, Stanic J, Pena-Karan S , et al. Pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions under CT guidance. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6 (Suppl. 01) S99-S107
  • 22 Tan BB, Flaherty KR, Kazerooni EA, Iannettoni MD ; American College of Chest Physicians. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 2003; 123 (1, Suppl): 89S-96S
  • 23 Chen A, Chenna P, Loiselle A, Massoni J, Mayse M, Misselhorn D. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for peripheral pulmonary lesions. A 5-year institutional experience. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11 (4) 578-582
  • 24 Chenna P, Chen AC. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and novel navigation biopsy techniques. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 35 (6) 645-654
  • 25 Eberhardt R, Ernst A, Herth FJ. Ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules less than 20 mm. Eur Respir J 2009; 34 (6) 1284-1287
  • 26 Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Becker HD, Ernst A. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy in fluoroscopically invisible solitary pulmonary nodules: a prospective trial. Chest 2006; 129 (1) 147-150
  • 27 Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR , et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (21) 1980-1991
  • 28 Smith MA, Battafarano RJ, Meyers BF, Zoole JB, Cooper JD, Patterson GA. Prevalence of benign disease in patients undergoing resection for suspected lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81 (5) 1824-1828 , discussion 1828–1829
  • 29 Wiener RS, Gould MK, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Clark JA. What do you mean, a spot?: a qualitative analysis of patients' reactions to discussions with their physicians about pulmonary nodules. Chest 2013; 143 (3) 672-677
  • 30 Gould MK, Wiener RS. Shared decision making in patients with pulmonary nodules. PCCSU Article. Available at http://www.chestnet.org/ . Accessed on July 29, 2016
  • 31 Fardanesh M, White C. Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2012; 33 (4) 280-287
  • 32 Zerhouni EA, Stitik FP, Siegelman SS , et al. CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study. Radiology 1986; 160 (2) 319-327
  • 33 Aberle DR, DeMello S, Berg CD , et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (10) 920-931
  • 34 Rubin DL. Informatics in radiology: measuring and improving quality in radiology: meeting the challenge with informatics. Radiographics 2011; 31 (6) 1511-1527
  • 35 Furuya K, Murayama S, Soeda H , et al. New classification of small pulmonary nodules by margin characteristics on high-resolution CT. Acta Radiol 1999; 40 (5) 496-504
  • 36 Winer-Muram HT. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology 2006; 239 (1) 34-49
  • 37 Erasmus JJ, Connolly JE, McAdams HP, Roggli VL. Solitary pulmonary nodules: part I. Morphologic evaluation for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Radiographics 2000; 20 (1) 43-58
  • 38 Heitzman ER, Markarian B, Raasch BN, Carsky EW, Lane EJ, Berlow ME. Pathways of tumor spread through the lung: radiologic correlations with anatomy and pathology. Radiology 1982; 144 (1) 3-14
  • 39 Zwirewich CV, Vedal S, Miller RR, Müller NL. Solitary pulmonary nodule: high-resolution CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1991; 179 (2) 469-476
  • 40 Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP , et al. CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 2004; 231 (1) 164-168
  • 41 Harders SW, Madsen HH, Rasmussen TR, Hager H, Rasmussen F. High resolution spiral CT for determining the malignant potential of solitary pulmonary nodules: refining and testing the test. Acta Radiol 2011; 52 (4) 401-409
  • 42 Mahoney MC, Shipley RT, Corcoran HL, Dickson BA. CT demonstration of calcification in carcinoma of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154 (2) 255-258
  • 43 Siegelman SS, Khouri NF, Scott Jr WW, Leo FP, Zerhouni EA. Computed tomography of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Semin Roentgenol 1984; 19 (3) 165-172
  • 44 Muram TM, Aisen A. Fatty metastatic lesions in 2 patients with renal clear-cell carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27 (6) 869-870
  • 45 Naidich DP, Bankier AA, MacMahon H , et al. Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2013; 266 (1) 304-317
  • 46 Truong MT, Ko JP, Rossi SE , et al. Update in the evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiographics 2014; 34 (6) 1658-1679
  • 47 Nathan MH, Collins VP, Adams RA. Differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules by growth rate. Radiology 1962; 79: 221-232
  • 48 Hasegawa M, Sone S, Takashima S , et al. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol 2000; 73 (876) 1252-1259
  • 49 Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H , et al. Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 2006; 54 (2) 177-184
  • 50 Heuvelmans MA, Oudkerk M, de Bock GH , et al. Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals. Eur Radiol 2013; 23 (7) 1836-1845
  • 51 van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M , et al. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (23) 2221-2229
  • 52 de Hoop B, Gietema H, van de Vorst S, Murphy K, van Klaveren RJ, Prokop M. Pulmonary ground-glass nodules: increase in mass as an early indicator of growth. Radiology 2010; 255 (1) 199-206
  • 53 Scholten ET, de Hoop B, Jacobs C , et al. Semi-automatic quantification of subsolid pulmonary nodules: comparison with manual measurements. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 (11) e80249
  • 54 Bouros D, Hatzakis K, Labrakis H, Zeibecoglou K. Association of malignancy with diseases causing interstitial pulmonary changes. Chest 2002; 121 (4) 1278-1289
  • 55 Radiology ACO. Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). Available at http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/LungRADS . Accessed on July 29, 2016
  • 56 Albert RH, Russell JJ. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Am Fam Physician 2009; 80 (8) 827-831
  • 57 Callister ME, Baldwin DR, Akram AR , et al; British Thoracic Society Pulmonary Nodule Guideline Development Group; British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 2015; 70 (Suppl. 02) ii1-ii54
  • 58 Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG Veterans Affairs SNAP Cooperative Study Group. A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 2007; 131 (2) 383-388
  • 59 Hodnett PA, Ko JP. Evaluation and management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Radiol Clin North Am 2012; 50 (5) 895-914
  • 60 Deppen SA, Blume JD, Aldrich MC , et al. Predicting lung cancer prior to surgical resection in patients with lung nodules. J Thorac Oncol 2014; 9 (10) 1477-1484
  • 61 Gurney JW, Lyddon DM, McKay JA. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part II. Application. Radiology 1993; 186 (2) 415-422
  • 62 Herder GJ, van Tinteren H, Golding RP , et al. Clinical prediction model to characterize pulmonary nodules: validation and added value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Chest 2005; 128 (4) 2490-2496
  • 63 Matsuki Y, Nakamura K, Watanabe H , et al. Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178 (3) 657-663
  • 64 McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR , et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (10) 910-919
  • 65 Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Edell ES. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157 (8) 849-855
  • 66 Tammemägi MC. Application of risk prediction models to lung cancer screening: a review. J Thorac Imaging 2015; 30 (2) 88-100
  • 67 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Lung Cancer Screening CT Protocols Version 3.0. Available at http://aapm.org/pubs/CTProtocols/documents/LungCancerScreeningCT.pdf . Accessed on July 29, 2016
  • 68 Cronin P, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Carlos RC. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy. Radiology 2008; 246 (3) 772-782
  • 69 Lee KS, Yi CA, Jeong SY , et al. Solid or partly solid solitary pulmonary nodules: their characterization using contrast wash-in and morphologic features at helical CT. Chest 2007; 131 (5) 1516-1525
  • 70 Ohno Y, Nishio M, Koyama H , et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion area-detector CT, dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and FDG PET/CT. Radiology 2015; 274 (2) 563-575
  • 71 Fornaro J, Leschka S, Hibbeln D , et al. Dual- and multi-energy CT: approach to functional imaging. Insights Imaging 2011; 2 (2) 149-159
  • 72 Kang MJ, Park CM, Lee CH, Goo JM, Lee HJ. Dual-energy CT: clinical applications in various pulmonary diseases. Radiographics 2010; 30 (3) 685-698
  • 73 Chae EJ, Song JW, Seo JB, Krauss B, Jang YM, Song KS. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: initial experience. Radiology 2008; 249 (2) 671-681
  • 74 Ohno Y, Nishio M, Koyama H , et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for pulmonary nodule assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202 (3) 515-529
  • 75 Sudarski S, Hagelstein C, Weis M, Schoenberg SO, Apfaltrer P. Dual-energy snap-shot perfusion CT in suspect pulmonary nodules and masses and for lung cancer staging. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84 (12) 2393-2400
  • 76 Schroeder T, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Ladd ME, Barkhausen J, Goehde SC. Detection of pulmonary nodules using a 2D HASTE MR sequence: comparison with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185 (4) 979-984
  • 77 Kono R, Fujimoto K, Terasaki H , et al. Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (1) 26-36
  • 78 Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Takenaka D, Adachi S, Kono M, Sugimura K. Solitary pulmonary nodules: potential role of dynamic MR imaging in management initial experience. Radiology 2002; 224 (2) 503-511
  • 79 Zou Y, Zhang M, Wang Q, Shang D, Wang L, Yu G. Quantitative investigation of solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and histopathologic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191 (1) 252-259
  • 80 Kurihara Y, Matsuoka S, Yamashiro T , et al. MRI of pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202 (3) W210–216
  • 81 Satoh S, Nakaminato S, Kihara A, Isogai S, Kawai S. Evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules with dynamic MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2013; 12 (1) 31-38
  • 82 Hagmann P, Jonasson L, Maeder P, Thiran JP, Wedeen VJ, Meuli R. Understanding diffusion MR imaging techniques: from scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Radiographics 2006; 26 (Suppl. 01) S205-S223
  • 83 Liu H, Liu Y, Yu T, Ye N. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary lesions. Eur Radiol 2010; 20 (4) 807-815
  • 84 Uto T, Takehara Y, Nakamura Y , et al. Higher sensitivity and specificity for diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant lung lesions without apparent diffusion coefficient quantification. Radiology 2009; 252 (1) 247-254
  • 85 Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001; 285 (7) 914-924
  • 86 Lowe VJ, Fletcher JW, Gobar L , et al. Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16 (3) 1075-1084
  • 87 Sung YM, Lee KS, Kim BT, Han J, Lee EJ. Lobar mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma of the lung showing negative FDG uptake on integrated PET/CT. Eur Radiol 2005; 15 (10) 2075-2078
  • 88 Nomori H, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka T, Naruke T, Suemasu K, Uno K. Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images. Lung Cancer 2004; 45 (1) 19-27
  • 89 Chun EJ, Lee HJ, Kang WJ , et al. Differentiation between malignancy and inflammation in pulmonary ground-glass nodules: the feasibility of integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Lung Cancer 2009; 65 (2) 180-186
  • 90 Callahan J, Kron T, Schneider ME, Hicks RJ. A prospective investigation into the clinical impact of 4D-PET/CT in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules. Cancer Imaging 2014; 14: 24
  • 91 García Vicente AM, Soriano Castrejón AM, Talavera Rubio MP , et al. (18)F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating in characterization of pulmonary lesions: approximation towards clinical indications. Ann Nucl Med 2010; 24 (3) 207-214
  • 92 Guerra L, De Ponti E, Elisei F , et al. Respiratory gated PET/CT in a European multicentre retrospective study: added diagnostic value in detection and characterization of lung lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39 (9) 1381-1390
  • 93 Gatenby RA, Grove O, Gillies RJ. Quantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecology. Radiology 2013; 269 (1) 8-15
  • 94 Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 2016; 278 (2) 563-577
  • 95 Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT , et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 4006
  • 96 Ganeshan B, Goh V, Mandeville HC, Ng QS, Hoskin PJ, Miles KA. Non-small cell lung cancer: histopathologic correlates for texture parameters at CT. Radiology 2013; 266 (1) 326-336
  • 97 Gevaert O, Xu J, Hoang CD , et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data—methods and preliminary results. Radiology 2012; 264 (2) 387-396
  • 98 Grove O, Berglund AE, Schabath MB , et al. Quantitative computed tomographic descriptors associate tumor shape complexity and intratumor heterogeneity with prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 2015; 10 (3) e0118261
  • 99 Maldonado F, Boland JM, Raghunath S , et al. Noninvasive characterization of the histopathologic features of pulmonary nodules of the lung adenocarcinoma spectrum using computer-aided nodule assessment and risk yield (CANARY)—a pilot study. J Thorac Oncol 2013; 8 (4) 452-460
  • 100 Committee MEDaCA. Lung cancer screening with low dose computed tomography. Available at http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/medcac-meeting-details.aspx?MEDCACId=68-agenda . Accessed on July 29, 2016
  • 101 Kahn Jr CE, Langlotz CP, Burnside ES , et al. Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 2009; 252 (3) 852-856
  • 102 Reiner BI. Customization of medical report data. J Digit Imaging 2010; 23 (4) 363-373
  • 103 Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H. Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 2011; 260 (1) 174-181
  • 104 Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Dann E, Black WC. Using radiology reports to encourage evidence-based practice in the evaluation of small, incidentally detected pulmonary nodules. A preliminary study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11 (2) 211-214
  • 105 Clark TJ, Flood TF, Maximin ST, Sachs PB. Lung CT screening reporting and data system speed and accuracy are increased with the use of a semiautomated computer application. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12 (12 Pt A): 1301-1306
  • 106 Blagev DP, Lloyd JF, Conner K , et al. Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and the radiology report. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11 (4) 378-383
  • 107 Callen JL, Westbrook JI, Georgiou A, Li J. Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27 (10) 1334-1348
  • 108 Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS , eds. To Err is Human: Building A Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America/National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 2000
  • 109 Danforth KN, Early MI, Ngan S, Kosco AE, Zheng C, Gould MK. Automated identification of patients with pulmonary nodules in an integrated health system using administrative health plan data, radiology reports, and natural language processing. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7 (8) 1257-1262
  • 110 Carrell DS, Halgrim S, Tran DT , et al. Using natural language processing to improve efficiency of manual chart abstraction in research: the case of breast cancer recurrence. Am J Epidemiol 2014; 179 (6) 749-758
  • 111 Slatore CG, Horeweg N, Jett JR , et al; ATS Ad Hoc Committee on Setting a Research Framework for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement: a research framework for pulmonary nodule evaluation and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192 (4) 500-514
  • 112 Jensen TS, Chin J, Ashby L, Hermansen J, Hutter J. Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) (cag-00439n). Available at http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database . Accessed on July 29, 2016
  • 113 Palma JF, Das P, Liesenfeld O. Lung cancer screening: utility of molecular applications in conjunction with low-dose computed tomography guidelines. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2016; 16 (4) 435-447
  • 114 Steiling K, Ryan J, Brody JS, Spira A. The field of tissue injury in the lung and airway. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2008; 1 (6) 396-403
  • 115 Jiang F, Todd NW, Li R, Zhang H, Fang H, Stass SA. A panel of sputum-based genomic marker for early detection of lung cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2010; 3 (12) 1571-1578
  • 116 Li R, Todd NW, Qiu Q , et al. Genetic deletions in sputum as diagnostic markers for early detection of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13 (2 Pt 1) 482-487
  • 117 Varella-Garcia M, Schulte AP, Wolf HJ , et al. The detection of chromosomal aneusomy by fluorescence in situ hybridization in sputum predicts lung cancer incidence. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2010; 3 (4) 447-453
  • 118 Xie Y, Todd NW, Liu Z , et al. Altered miRNA expression in sputum for diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2010; 67 (2) 170-176
  • 119 Xing L, Su J, Guarnera MA , et al. Sputum microRNA biomarkers for identifying lung cancer in indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21 (2) 484-489
  • 120 Beane J, Sebastiani P, Whitfield TH , et al. A prediction model for lung cancer diagnosis that integrates genomic and clinical features. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2008; 1 (1) 56-64
  • 121 Spira A, Beane JE, Shah V , et al. Airway epithelial gene expression in the diagnostic evaluation of smokers with suspect lung cancer. Nat Med 2007; 13 (3) 361-366
  • 122 Silvestri GA, Vachani A, Whitney D , et al; AEGIS Study Team. A bronchial genomic classifier for the diagnostic evaluation of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373 (3) 243-251
  • 123 Dent AG, Sutedja TG, Zimmerman PV. Exhaled breath analysis for lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2013; 5 (Suppl. 05) S540-S550
  • 124 Hasan N, Kumar R, Kavuru MS. Lung cancer screening beyond low-dose computed tomography: the role of novel biomarkers. Lung 2014; 192 (5) 639-648
  • 125 Stojadinovic A, Nissan A, Gallimidi Z , et al. Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 (12) 2703-2715
  • 126 Yung RC, Zeng MY, Stoddard GJ, Garff M, Callahan K. Transcutaneous computed bioconductance measurement in lung cancer: a treatment enabling technology useful for adjunctive risk stratification in the evaluation of suspicious pulmonary lesions. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7 (4) 681-689
  • 127 Spira A, Halmos B, Powell CA. Update in Lung Cancer 2014. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192 (3) 283-294
  • 128 Gaga M, Powell CA, Schraufnagel DE , et al; ATS/ERS Task Force on the Role of the Pulmonologist in the Management of Lung Cancer. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: the role of the pulmonologist in the diagnosis and management of lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188 (4) 503-507
  • 129 Oki M, Saka H, Kitagawa C , et al. Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing lung cancer: a randomized study. Respiration 2013; 85 (6) 486-492
  • 130 Tsou MH, Tsai SF, Chan KY , et al. CT-guided needle biopsy: value of on-site cytopathologic evaluation of core specimen touch preparations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (1) 71-76
  • 131 Gilbert C, Akulian J, Ortiz R, Lee H, Yarmus L. Novel bronchoscopic strategies for the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions: present techniques and future directions. Respirology 2014; 19 (5) 636-644
  • 132 Pahlevaninezhad H, Lee AM, Ritchie A , et al. Endoscopic Doppler optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence imaging of peripheral pulmonary nodules and vasculature. Biomed Opt Express 2015; 6 (10) 4191-4199
  • 133 Winokur RS, Pua BB, Sullivan BW, Madoff DC. Percutaneous lung biopsy: technique, efficacy, and complications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013; 30 (2) 121-127
  • 134 Choi SH, Chae EJ, Kim JE , et al. Percutaneous CT-guided aspiration and core biopsy of pulmonary nodules smaller than 1 cm: analysis of outcomes of 305 procedures from a tertiary referral center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201 (5) 964-970
  • 135 Li Y, Du Y, Yang HF, Yu JH, Xu XX. CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy for small (≤20 mm) pulmonary lesions. Clin Radiol 2013; 68 (1) e43-e48
  • 136 Ocak S, Duplaquet F, Jamart J , et al. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsies: 14-gauge versus 22-gauge needles. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (5) 674-681
  • 137 Yang W, Sun W, Li Q , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy for solitary pulmonary nodules. PLoS ONE 2015; 10 (6) e0131373
  • 138 Kuban JD, Tam AL, Huang SY , et al. The effect of needle gauge on the risk of pneumothorax and chest tube placement after percutaneous computed tomographic (CT)-guided lung biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38 (6) 1595-1602
  • 139 Moreland A, Novogrodsky E, Brody L , et al. Pneumothorax with prolonged chest tube requirement after CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy: incidence and risk factors. Eur Radiol 2016; (e-pub ahead of print)
  • 140 Nour-Eldin NE, Alsubhi M, Emam A , et al. Pneumothorax complicating coaxial and non-coaxial CT-guided lung biopsy: comparative analysis of determining risk factors and management of pneumothorax in a retrospective review of 650 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39 (2) 261-270
  • 141 Anzidei M, Argirò R, Porfiri A , et al. Preliminary clinical experience with a dedicated interventional robotic system for CT-guided biopsies of lung lesions: a comparison with the conventional manual technique. Eur Radiol 2015; 25 (5) 1310-1316
  • 142 Grand DJ, Atalay MA, Cronan JJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE. CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy: comparison of conventional CT fluoroscopy to CT fluoroscopy with electromagnetic navigation system in 60 consecutive patients. Eur J Radiol 2011; 79 (2) e133-e136
  • 143 Grasso RF, Cazzato RL, Luppi G , et al. Percutaneous lung biopsies: performance of an optical CT-based navigation system with a low-dose protocol. Eur Radiol 2013; 23 (11) 3071-3076
  • 144 Spliethoff JW, Prevoo W, Meier MA , et al. Real-time in vivo tissue characterization with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy during transthoracic lung biopsy: a clinical feasibility study. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22 (2) 357-365
  • 145 Ost DE, Ernst A, Lei X , et al; AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. Diagnostic yield and complications of bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions. Results of the AQuIRE Registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193 (1) 68-77
  • 146 Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013; 143 (5, Suppl): e142S-e165S