Fingertip Replantation with the Use of a Long Vein Graft: Training Young Surgeons in a Feasible Technique to Maintain Optimal Results

Abstract

Background Fingertip replantation has become a standard operation for well-experienced microsurgeons, but naturally there are some unsuccessful cases. Furthermore, younger surgeons need experience with this procedure, as replantations are often an emergency operation and experts may not be available to attend. Therefore, we reviewed our cases to determine the most effective procedure that can enable young surgeons to obtain a good outcome.

Methods We retrospectively investigated 69 fingertip replantation cases treated between January 2006 and December 2014 at the Kyorin University Hospital. All operations were performed by several young surgeons who were instructed by one experienced surgeon (the principal author, T.S.). In this study, cases were divided into three groups according to vein graft usage. In group A, a long vein graft that reached the proximal phalanx was employed. In group B, a short vein graft that was almost as long as the arterial defect was employed. In group C, no vein graft was used. The differences in the survival rates of the fingertips between the groups were analyzed.

Results The total fingertip survival rate was 93% (64 out of 69). All 42 (100%) fingertips in group A survived, 5 of 6 (83%) fingertips in group B survived, and 17 of 21 (81%) fingertips in group C survived.

Conclusion Preferential use of a long vein graft could provide superior results and enable young surgeons to perform successful fingertip replantations, as it is a reliable and relatively an easy procedure compared with other techniques.

Keywords

fingertip replantation - long vein graft - training

• References

• 1 Komatsu S, Tamai S. Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42: 375-376
• 2 Hahn HO, Jung SG. Results of replantation of amputated fingertips in 450 patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22 (6) 407-413
• 3 Ozcelik IB, Tuncer S, Purisa H , et al. Sensory outcome of fingertip replantations without nerve repair. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (7) 524-530
• 4 Li J, Guo Z, Zhu Q , et al. Fingertip replantation: determinants of survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (3) 833-839
• 5 Zhang X, Wen S, Wang B, Wang Q, Li C, Zhu H. Reconstruction of circulation in the fingertip without vein repair in zone I replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (9) 1597-1601
• 6 Hasuo T, Nishi G, Tsuchiya D, Otsuka T. Fingertip replantations: importance of venous anastomosis and the clinical results. Hand Surg 2009; 14 (1) 1-6
• 7 Yan H, Jackson WD, Songcharoen S , et al. Vein grafting in fingertip replantations. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (4) 275-281
• 8 Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (3) 723-737
• 9 Ikeda K, Morikawa S, Hashimoto F, Tomita K. Fingertip replantation: pre-osteosynthesis vein graft technique. Microsurgery 1994; 15 (6) 430-432
• 10 Sabapathy SR, Venkatramani H, Bharathi RR, Sebastin SJ. Distal fingertip replantation without skeletal fixation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2005; 21 (1) 11-13
• 11 Kurita M, Shiraishi T, Ozaki M, Takushima A, Harii K. Usefulness of microscope-based ICG videoangiography for detection of the dominant drainage vein in fingertip replantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (12) 2200-2201
• 12 Koshima I. Atypical arteorile anastomoses for fingertip replantations under digital block. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61: 84-87