Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2017; 06(01): 060-064
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586496
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Microfracture for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: Surgical Technique and Outcomes with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

David Kaufman
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
,
Jennifer Etcheson
2   Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire
,
Jeffrey Yao
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Redwood City, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 May 2016

27 June 2016

Publication Date:
05 August 2016 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess functional and patient-reported outcomes after lunate microfracture for management of lunate chondral lesions in the setting of ulnar impaction syndrome.

Methods This was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy for triangular fibrocartilage complex pathology by one surgeon from 2007 until 2010. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores were assessed preoperatively and at minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient-rated wrist evaluation and bilateral wrist range of motion, grip strength, and key pinch strength were assessed at final follow-up.

Results A total of 22 patients underwent microfracture of the carpus during the study period, of which 7 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Mean DASH scores improved significantly (p < 0.001), from 58.3 (standard deviation: 13.5) before the procedure to 15.1 (standard deviation: 8.6) at minimum 2-year follow-up. Operative wrist pronation and supination showed equivalence with the contralateral wrist at final follow-up (p < 0.05, E = 15 degrees, standard deviation pronation: 3.25, supination: 3.49).

Discussion This study suggests that lunate microfracture may be a useful technique for treating articular defects of the lunate in the setting of ulnar impaction syndrome.

Type of Study/Level of Evidence Therapeutic, level IV.

Keywords

microfracture - ulnar impaction syndrome - ulnocarpal abutment syndrome - ulnocarpal arthritis - wrist arthroscopy

Note

The investigation was performed at the Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation, Stanford University Institutional Review Board, and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).


 

  • References

  • 1 Friedman SL, Palmer AK. The ulnar impaction syndrome. Hand Clin 1991; 7 (2) 295-310
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Baek GH, Lee HJ, Gong HS , et al. Long-term outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome: at least 5-years follow-up. Clin Orthop Surg 2011; 3 (4) 295-301
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Tomaino MM. Ulnar impaction syndrome in the ulnar negative and neutral wrist. Diagnosis and pathoanatomy. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998; 23 (6) 754-757
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kim BS, Song HS. A comparison of ulnar shortening osteotomy alone versus combined arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome. Clin Orthop Surg 2011; 3 (3) 184-190
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Katz DI, Seiler III JG, Bond TC. The treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. J Surg Orthop Adv 2010; 19 (4) 218-222
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Tomaino MM, Weiser RW. Combined arthroscopic TFCC debridement and wafer resection of the distal ulna in wrists with triangular fibrocartilage complex tears and positive ulnar variance. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (6) 1047-1052
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Palmer AK. Triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions: a classification. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (4) 594-606
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Mithoefer K, McAdams T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR. Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (10) 2053-2063
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 McBeath R, Katolik LI, Shin EK. Ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (2) 379-381
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Outerbridge RE. Further studies on the etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964; 46: 179-190
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Bickel KD. Arthroscopic treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (8) 1420-1423
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Papapetropoulos PA, Wartinbee DA, Richard MJ, Leversedge FJ, Ruch DS. Management of peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in the ulnar positive patient: arthroscopic repair versus ulnar shortening osteotomy. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (10) 1607-1613
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Alford JW, Cole BJ. Cartilage restoration, part 1: basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (2) 295-306
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ. Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (391, Suppl) S362-S369
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Franke O, Durst K, Maier V , et al. Mechanical properties of hyaline and repair cartilage studied by nanoindentation. Acta Biomater 2007; 3 (6) 873-881
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Burkhead Jr WZ, Krishnan SG, Lin KC. Biologic resurfacing of the arthritic glenohumeral joint: Historical review and current applications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16 (5, Suppl): S248-S253
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar