J Wrist Surg 2017; 06(01): 060-064
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586496
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Microfracture for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: Surgical Technique and Outcomes with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

David Kaufman
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
,
Jennifer Etcheson
2   Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire
,
Jeffrey Yao
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Redwood City, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 May 2016

27 June 2016

Publication Date:
05 August 2016 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess functional and patient-reported outcomes after lunate microfracture for management of lunate chondral lesions in the setting of ulnar impaction syndrome.

Methods This was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy for triangular fibrocartilage complex pathology by one surgeon from 2007 until 2010. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores were assessed preoperatively and at minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient-rated wrist evaluation and bilateral wrist range of motion, grip strength, and key pinch strength were assessed at final follow-up.

Results A total of 22 patients underwent microfracture of the carpus during the study period, of which 7 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Mean DASH scores improved significantly (p < 0.001), from 58.3 (standard deviation: 13.5) before the procedure to 15.1 (standard deviation: 8.6) at minimum 2-year follow-up. Operative wrist pronation and supination showed equivalence with the contralateral wrist at final follow-up (p < 0.05, E = 15 degrees, standard deviation pronation: 3.25, supination: 3.49).

Discussion This study suggests that lunate microfracture may be a useful technique for treating articular defects of the lunate in the setting of ulnar impaction syndrome.

Type of Study/Level of Evidence Therapeutic, level IV.

Note

The investigation was performed at the Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation, Stanford University Institutional Review Board, and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).