Am J Perinatol 2016; 33(11): 1035-1039
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586114
Editorial
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Selected Advances and Dilemmas in Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine 2016

Avroy A. Fanaroff
1   Division of Neonatology, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
2   Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 September 2016 (online)

Choosing Wisely

Following the example of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's “Choosing Wisely” campaign, which encourages “physicians, patients, and other health care stakeholders to think and talk about medical tests and procedures that may be unnecessary,” the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) joined the Choosing Wisely campaign in 2013. The “Choosing Wisely” campaign charges medical societies with identifying the use of unnecessary tests and treatments which contribute to health care waste. Ho et al[1] reported on the initial series of tests and treatments that could not be justified on the basis of efficacy, safety, or cost. In neonates: The 51 person expert panel achieved consensus on the following top five items[1]: avoid routine use of antireflux medications for treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease or for treatment of apnea and desaturation in preterm infants,[2] avoid routine continuation of antibiotic therapy beyond 48 hours for initially asymptomatic infants without evidence of bacterial infection,[3] avoid routine use of pneumograms for predischarge assessment of ongoing and/or prolonged apnea of prematurity,[4] avoid routine daily chest radiographs without an indication for intubated infants, and[5] avoid routine screening term-equivalent or discharge brain magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants.

By following these guidelines, patient safety will not be compromised, but costs will be reduced. There is a reason for optimism that the “Choosing Wisely” program will be accepted in the neonatal community as neonatologists are comfortable when guided by “evidence.” Neonatology has recently not found magical bullets of the caliber of antenatal corticosteroids, surfactant therapy, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and hypothermia for hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. To optimize outcomes we need to practice safely and as a comprehensive team applying the evidence and guidelines that are available. “Choosing Wisely” adds baby steps to these endeavors.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ho T, Dukhovny D, Zupancic JA, Goldmann DA, Horbar JD, Pursley DM. Choosing Wisely in Newborn Medicine: Five Opportunities to Increase Value. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (02) e482-e489
  • 2 Petrikin JE, Willig LK, Smith LD, Kingsmore SF. Rapid whole genome sequencing and precision neonatology. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39 (08) 623-631
  • 3 Miller NA, Farrow EG, Gibson M. , et al. A 26-hour system of highly sensitive whole genome sequencing for emergency management of genetic diseases. Genome Med 2015; 7: 100
  • 4 Deem MJ. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Disability in the NICU: Exploring Practical and Ethical Challenges. Pediatrics 2016; 137 (Suppl. 01) S47-S55
  • 5 The United Nations Children's Fund and World Health Organization. Every newborn: An action plan to end preventable newborn deaths (2013). Available at: www.everynewborn.org . Accessed July 7, 2016
  • 6 Dickson KE, Simen-Kapeu A, Kinney MV. , et al; Lancet Every Newborn Study Group. Every Newborn: health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries. Lancet 2014; 384 (9941): 438-454
  • 7 Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R. , et al; Lancet Newborn Interventions Review Group; Lancet Every Newborn Study Group. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?. Lancet 2014; 384 (9940): 347-370
  • 8 Obstetric care consensus no. 4: Periviable birth. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127 (06) e157-e169
  • 9 Ishii N, Kono Y, Yonemoto N, Kusuda S, Fujimura M. ; Neonatal Research Network, Japan. Outcomes of infants born at 22 and 23 weeks' gestation. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (01) 62-71
  • 10 Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF. , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (03) 443-456
  • 11 Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF. , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (19) 1801-1811
  • 12 Costeloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ 2012; 345: e7976
  • 13 Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 343 (06) 378-384
  • 14 Moore GP, Lemyre B, Barrowman N, Daboval T. Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 4 to 8 years of children born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestational age: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167 (10) 967-974
  • 15 Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M. ; EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 (01) 9-19
  • 16 Morris M, Cleary JP, Soliman A. Small Baby Unit Improves Quality and Outcomes in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (04) e1007-e1015
  • 17 Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No.543: Timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (06) 1522-1526
  • 18 Al-Wassia H, Shah PS. Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord milking at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169 (01) 18-25
  • 19 Chiruvolu A, Tolia VN, Qin H. , et al. Effect of delayed cord clamping on very preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (05) 676.e1-676.e7
  • 20 Garabedian C, Rakza T, Drumez E. , et al. Benefits of Delayed Cord Clamping in Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization. Pediatrics 2016; 137 (03) e20153236
  • 21 Ruangkit C, Moroney V, Viswanathan S, Bhola M. Safety and efficacy of delayed umbilical cord clamping in multiple and singleton premature infants - A quality improvement study. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2015; 8 (04) 393-402
  • 22 Rabe H, Sawyer A, Amess P, Ayers S. ; Brighton Perinatal Study Group. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 2 and 3.5 Years for Very Preterm Babies Enrolled in a Randomized Trial of Milking the Umbilical Cord versus Delayed Cord Clamping. Neonatology 2016; 109 (02) 113-119
  • 23 Andersson O, Lindquist B, Lindgren M, Stjernqvist K, Domellöf M, Hellström-Westas L. Effect of Delayed Cord Clamping on Neurodevelopment at 4 Years of Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169 (07) 631-638
  • 24 Mercer JS, Erickson-Owens DA, Vohr BR. , et al. Effects of Placental Transfusion on Neonatal and 18 Month Outcomes in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr 2016; 168: 50-5.e1
  • 25 Azzuqa A, Watchko JF. Bilirubin concentrations in jaundiced neonates with conjunctival icterus. J Pediatr 2015; 167 (04) 840-844
  • 26 Maisels MJ, Coffey MP, Gendelman B. , et al. Diagnosing jaundice by eye-outpatient assessment of conjunctival icterus in the newborn. J Pediatr 2016; 172: 212-214.e1