Patient Counseling and Preferences for Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery

Abstract

Objective We sought to identify factors influencing a woman's decision to have an elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) versus vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).

Methods and Materials A prospective study at two academic medical centers of women with one prior cesarean, and no contraindication to a trial of labor, delivered by ERCD from October 2013 to June 2014. Participants completed anonymous surveys during their delivery hospitalization. Counseling was considered adequate if women reported being counseled, recalled being quoted a VBAC success probability, and this probability was within 20% of that derived from an established VBAC success prediction model. Participants were also asked why they chose ERCD.

Results Of 68 participants, only 8 (11.8%) had adequate counseling. Of those with inadequate counseling, 21.7% did not recall being counseled, 63.3% were not quoted a chance of success, and 60.0% had more than a 20% discrepancy between their recalled and predicted success rates. Eighteen women were calculated to have more than 70% chance of successful VBAC. Of these, 16 (88.9%) were not adequately counseled.

Conclusion Most women were inadequately counseled about delivery options. The most important factors influencing the choice of ERCD over VBAC were patient preferences, risk for fetal injury, and perceived physician preference.

Keywords

elective repeat cesarean delivery - vaginal birth after cesarean - counseling - patient preference

• References

• 1 Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (3) 179-193
• 2 Cheng YW, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L, Caughey AB, Guise JM. Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38 (2) 297-309
• 3 Statistics. User Guide to the 2013 Natality Public Use File. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
• 4 Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C , et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2010; (191) 1-397
• 5 Signore C, Spong CY. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights manuscripts from an NIH Consensus Development Conference, March 8-10, 2010. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34 (5) 309-310
• 6 Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, Jackson M, Holmgren C, Esplin S. How do good candidates for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who undergo elective repeat cesarean differ from those who choose TOLAC?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208 (458) e1-e6
• 7 Shorten A. Bridging the gap between mothers and medicine: “new insights” from the NIH Consensus Conference on VBAC. Birth 2010; 37 (3) 181-183
• 8 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (6) 1279-1295