Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2016; 37(03): 158-165
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583547
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Next 10 Years in Voice Evaluation and Treatment

Julie M. Barkmeier-Kraemer
1   Division of Otolaryngology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Rita R. Patel
2   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 May 2016 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Voice disorders are thought to affect approximately one third of all individuals within the United States during their lifetime. Individuals who require the use of their voice as part of their occupations are at highest risk for developing voice problems. Unfortunately, efficient diagnosis and effective management of voice disorders can be challenged by difficulty accessing professionals with the necessary expertise to diagnose and treat voice problems efficiently. Within the next decade, technological advancements show promise for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of intervention for voice disorders. Exciting developments in laryngeal imaging, modeling of patient-specific vocal patterns, and implementation of smart mobile technology and telehealth will greatly improve the accuracy of diagnosing voice problems and enhance implementation and carryover of effective voice treatment methods to daily communication demands.

Keywords

Voice - voice disorders - evaluation - treatment - technology
 

  • References

  • 1 Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, Gray SD, Smith EM. Voice disorders in teachers and the general population: effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 47 (3) 542-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cohen SM, Kim J, Roy N, Asche C, Courey M. Direct health care costs of laryngeal diseases and disorders. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (7) 1582-1588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Verdolini K, Ramig LO. Review: occupational risks for voice problems. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2001; 26 (1) 37-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cohen SM, Kim J, Roy N, Asche C, Courey M. The impact of laryngeal disorders on work-related dysfunction. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (7) 1589-1594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cohen SM, Kim J, Roy N, Courey M. Delayed otolaryngology referral for voice disorders increases health care costs. Am J Med 2015; 128 (4) 426.e11-426.e18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wilson DK. Voice Problems in Children. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD/London, UK: Williams and Wilkins; 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 7 McMurray JS. Disorders of phonation in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2003; 50 (2) 363-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ruddy BH, Sapienza CM. Treating voice disorders in the school-based setting: working within the framework of IDEA. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2004; 35 (4) 327-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Connor NP, Cohen SB, Theis SM, Thibeault SL, Heatley DG, Bless DM. Attitudes of children with dysphonia. J Voice 2008; 22 (2) 197-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lass NJ, Ruscello DM, Bradshaw KH, Blankenship BL. Adolescents' perceptions of normal and voice-disordered children. J Commun Disord 1991; 24 (4) 267-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Olthoff A, Woywod C, Kruse E. Stroboscopy versus high-speed glottography: a comparative study. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (6) 1123-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Patel R, Dailey S, Bless D. Comparison of high-speed digital imaging with stroboscopy for laryngeal imaging of glottal disorders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008; 117 (6) 413-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hertegård S, Larsson H, Wittenberg T. High-speed imaging: applications and development. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2003; 28 (3) 133-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kunduk M, Yan Y, McWhorter AJ, Bless D. Investigation of voice initiation and voice offset characteristics with high-speed digital imaging. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2006; 31 (3) 139-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hoppe U, Rosanowski F, Döllinger M, Lohscheller J, Schuster M, Eysholdt U. Glissando: laryngeal motorics and acoustics. J Voice 2003; 17 (3) 370-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kiritani S, Hirose H, Imagawa H. High-speed digital image-analysis of vocal cord vibration in diplophonia. Speech Commun 1993; 13 (1–2) 23-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Patel RR, Liu L, Galatsanos N, Bless DM. Differential vibratory characteristics of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and muscle tension dysphonia on high-speed digital imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011; 120 (1) 21-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Freeman E, Woo P, Saxman JH, Murry T. A comparison of sung and spoken phonation onset gestures using high-speed digital imaging. J Voice 2012; 26 (2) 226-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yamauchi A, Imagawa H, Yokonishi H , et al. Evaluation of vocal fold vibration with an assessment form for high-speed digital imaging: comparative study between healthy young and elderly subjects. J Voice 2012; 26 (6) 742-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ahmad K, Yan Y, Bless D. Vocal fold vibratory characteristics of healthy geriatric females—analysis of high-speed digital images. J Voice 2012; 26 (6) 751-759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chodara AM, Krausert CR, Jiang JJ. Kymographic characterization of vibration in human vocal folds with nodules and polyps. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (1) 58-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yamauchi A, Yokonishi H, Imagawa H , et al. Visualization and estimation of vibratory disturbance in vocal fold scar using high-speed digital imaging. J Voice 2015; pii: S0892-1997(15)00151-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.07.003. [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bohr C, Kräck A, Dubrovskiy D , et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of high-speed videolaryngoscopic imaging of organic pathologies in males. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014; 57 (4) 1148-1161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bohr C, Kraeck A, Eysholdt U, Ziethe A, Döllinger M. Quantitative analysis of organic vocal fold pathologies in females by high-speed endoscopy. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (7) 1686-1693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Patel RR, Walker R, Sivasankar PM. Spatiotemporal quantification of vocal fold vibration following exposure to superficial laryngeal dehydration: a preliminary study. J Voice 2015; pii: S0892-1997(15)00157-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.07.009. [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Patel R, Donohue KD, Unnikrishnan H, Kryscio RJ. Kinematic measurements of the vocal-fold displacement waveform in typical children and adult populations: quantification of high-speed endoscopic videos. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58 (2) 227-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Patel RR, Dubrovskiy D, Döllinger M. Measurement of glottal cycle characteristics between children and adults: physiological variations. J Voice 2014; 28 (4) 476-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Patel RR, Pickering J, Stemple J, Donohue KD. A case report in changes in phonatory physiology following voice therapy: application of high-speed imaging. J Voice 2012; 26 (6) 734-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mehta DD, Deliyski DD, Zeitels SM, Quatieri TF, Hillman RE. Voice production mechanisms following phonosurgical treatment of early glottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010; 119 (1) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jiang JJ, Chang CI, Raviv JR, Gupta S, Banzali Jr FM, Hanson DG. Quantitative study of mucosal wave via videokymography in canine larynges. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (9) 1567-1573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Schuberth S, Hoppe U, Döllinger M, Lohscheller J, Eysholdt U. High-precision measurement of the vocal fold length and vibratory amplitudes. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (6) 1043-1049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Patel RR, Donohue KD, Johnson WC, Archer SM. Laser projection imaging for measurement of pediatric voice. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (11) 2411-2417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Patel RR, Donohue KD, Lau D, Unnikrishnan H. In vivo measurement of pediatric vocal fold motion using structured light laser projection. J Voice 2013; 27 (4) 463-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Semmler M, Kniesburges S, Birk V, Ziethe A, Patel R, Doellinger M. 3D reconstruction of human laryngeal dynamics based on endoscopic high-speed recordings. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Panek D, Skalski A, Zielinski T, Deliyski DD. Voice pathology classification based on high-speed videoendoscopy. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015; 2015: 735-738
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Voigt D, Döllinger M, Yang A, Eysholdt U, Lohscheller J. Automatic diagnosis of vocal fold paresis by employing phonovibrogram features and machine learning methods. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2010; 99 (3) 275-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Voigt D, Döllinger M, Braunschweig T, Yang A, Eysholdt U, Lohscheller J. Classification of functional voice disorders based on phonovibrograms. Artif Intell Med 2010; 49 (1) 51-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Li NY, Verdolini K, Clermont G , et al. A patient-specific in silico model of inflammation and healing tested in acute vocal fold injury. PLoS ONE 2008; 3 (7) e2789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Li NY, Vodovotz Y, Kim KH, Mi Q, Hebda PA, Abbott KV. Biosimulation of acute phonotrauma: an extended model. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (11) 2418-2428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lester RA, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Story BH. Physiologic and acoustic patterns of essential vocal tremor. J Voice 2013; 27 (4) 422-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lester RA, Story BH. The effects of physiological adjustments on the perceptual and acoustical characteristics of simulated laryngeal vocal tremor. J Acoust Soc Am 2015; 138 (2) 953-963
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Chhetri DK, Neubauer J, Bergeron JL, Sofer E, Peng KA, Jamal N. Effects of asymmetric superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on glottic posture, acoustics, vibration. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (12) 3110-3116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Chhetri DK, Neubauer J, Berry DA. Neuromuscular control of fundamental frequency and glottal posture at phonation onset. J Acoust Soc Am 2012; 131 (2) 1401-1412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Erath BD, Peterson SD, Zañartu M, Wodicka GR, Plesniak MW. A theoretical model of the pressure field arising from asymmetric intraglottal flows applied to a two-mass model of the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 130 (1) 389-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Khosla S, Oren L, Gutmark E. An example of the role of basic science research to inform the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis. SIG 3 Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders. ASHA 2014; 24: 37-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Yang A, Berry DA, Kaltenbacher M, Döllinger M. Three-dimensional biomechanical properties of human vocal folds: parameter optimization of a numerical model to match in vitro dynamics. J Acoust Soc Am 2012; 131 (2) 1378-1390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Yang A, Stingl M, Berry DA , et al. Computation of physiological human vocal fold parameters by mathematical optimization of a biomechanical model. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 130 (2) 948-964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Chhetri DK, Neubauer J, Sofer E, Berry DA. Influence and interactions of laryngeal adductors and cricothyroid muscles on fundamental frequency and glottal posture control. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 135 (4) 2052-2064
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Stepp CE, Hillman RE, Heaton JT. A virtual trajectory model predicts differences in vocal fold kinematics in individuals with vocal hyperfunction. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 127 (5) 3166-3176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Popolo PS, Svec JG, Titze IR. Adaptation of a Pocket PC for use as a wearable voice dosimeter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48 (4) 780-791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Mehta DD, Van Stan JH, Zañartu M , et al. Using ambulatory voice monitoring to investigate common voice disorders: research update. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2015; 3 (3) 155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Ghassemi M, Van Stan JH, Mehta DD , et al. Learning to detect vocal hyperfunction from ambulatory neck-surface acceleration features: initial results for vocal fold nodules. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014; 61 (6) 1668-1675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Mehta DD, Zañartu M, Feng SW, Cheyne II HA, Hillman RE. Mobile voice health monitoring using a wearable accelerometer sensor and a smartphone platform. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012; 59 (11) 3090-3096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Halpern AE, Spielman JL, Hunter EJ, Titze IR. The inability to produce soft voice (IPSV): a tool to detect vocal change in school-teachers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2009; 34 (3) 117-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Titze IR, Hunter EJ. Comparison of vocal vibration-dose measures for potential-damage risk criteria. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58 (5) 1425-1439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Zañartu M, Ho JC, Mehta DD, Hillman RE, Wodicka GR. Subglottal impedance-based inverse filtering of voiced sounds using neck surface acceleration. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 2013; 21 (9) 1929-1939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Llico AF, Zañartu M, González AJ , et al. Real-time estimation of aerodynamic features for ambulatory voice biofeedback. J Acoust Soc Am 2015; 138 (1) EL14-EL19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Smith N, Rivera L, Dietrich M, Shyu CR, Page M, DeSouza G. Detection of simulated vocal dysfunctions using complex sEMG patterns. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2015;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Stepp CE, Heaton JT, Jetté ME, Burns JA, Hillman RE. Neck surface electromyography as a measure of vocal hyperfunction before and after injection laryngoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010; 119 (9) 594-601
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 van Leer E, Connor NP. Use of portable digital media players increases patient motivation and practice in voice therapy. J Voice 2012; 26 (4) 447-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 van Leer E, Connor NP. Predicting and influencing voice therapy adherence using social-cognitive factors and mobile video. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015; 24 (2) 164-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Mashima PA, Brown JE. Remote management of voice and swallowing disorders. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2011; 44 (6) 1305-1316 , viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Mashima PA, Birkmire-Peters DP, Syms MJ, Holtel MR, Burgess LP, Peters LJ. Telehealth: voice therapy using telecommunications technology. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003; 12 (4) 432-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Kelchner L. Telehealth and the treatment of voice disorders: a discussion regarding evidence. SIG 3 Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders 2013; 23: 88-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Howell S, Tripoliti E, Pring T. Delivering the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) by web camera: a feasibility study. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2009; 44 (3) 287-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Bond WF, Schwartz LM, Weaver KR, Levick D, Giuliano M, Graber ML. Differential diagnosis generators: an evaluation of currently available computer programs. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27 (2) 213-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar