Anterior Skull Base Defects Reconstructed Using Three-Layer Method: 78 Consecutive Cases with Long-Term Follow-Up

Abstract

Objectives Anterior skull base defects are potentially lethal and surgical treatment must be performed as soon as possible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether our technique is effective or not in long-term period.

Design Retrospective chart review of all patients whose data were entered into the Hospital Registry System between 1995 and 2015.

Setting/Participants This study was performed at the Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey, in 2015 and included 78 patients who in the past 20 years underwent three-layer reconstruction surgery for anterior skull base defects at the same university.

Main Outcome Measures Among the patients, defects repaired by transcranial approach had the lowest recurrence rate. Overall, successful repair was achieved in 100% of the patients.

Results Pure transbasal approach was used as a single procedure on 71 (91%) patients. Combined approaches were used in seven (9%) cases. The extended transbasal approach was combined with a transfacial approach in four patients and with a pterional approach in three patients.

Conclusion We encourage the use of three-layer reconstruction and recommend free fascia lata grafts and galeal flaps with vascularized pedicle as sealing material of choice in all types of cases such as tumor and trauma.

Keywords

skull base defect - pericranium - reconstruction - vascular flap

Note

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this article.

• References

• 1 Boyle JO, Shah KC, Shah JP. Craniofacial resection for malignant neoplasms of the skull base: an overview. J Surg Oncol 1998; 69 (4) 275-284
• 2 Gilat H, Rappaport Z, Yaniv E. Endoscopic transnasal cerebrospinal fluid leak repair: a 10 year experience. Isr Med Assoc J 2011; 13 (10) 597-600
• 3 Kryzanski JT, Annino DJ, Gopal H, Heilman CB. Low complication rates of cranial and craniofacial approaches to midline anterior skull base lesions. Skull Base 2008; 18 (4) 229-241
• 4 Gök A, Erkutlu I, Alptekin M, Kanlikama M. Three-layer reconstruction with fascia lata and vascularized pericranium for anterior skull base defects. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146 (1) 53-56 , discussion 56–57
• 5 Elbabaa SK, Al-Mefty O. Craniofacial approach for anterior skull-base lesions. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2010; 18 (2) 151-160
• 6 Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal versus open repair of anterior skull base CSF leak, meningocele, and encephalocele: a systematic review of outcomes. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74 (4) 239-250
• 7 White DR, Dubin MG, Senior BA. Endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks after neurosurgical procedures. Am J Otolaryngol 2003; 24 (4) 213-216
• 8 Zaidi HA, Zehri A, Smith TR, Nakaji P, Laws Jr ER. Efficacy of three-dimensional endoscopy for ventral skull base pathology: a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2016; 86: 419-431
• 9 Eloy JA, Shukla PA, Choudhry OJ, Singh R, Liu JK. Assessment of frontal lobe sagging after endoscopic endonasal transcribriform resection of anterior skull base tumors: is rigid structural reconstruction of the cranial base defect necessary?. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (12) 2652-2657
• 10 Chandler JP, Silva FE. Extended transbasal approach to skull base tumors. Technical nuances and review of the literature. Oncology (Williston Park) 2005; 19 (7) 913-919 , discussion 920, 923–925, 929
• 11 Schroeder HW. Indications and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (6, Suppl): S81-S85
• 12 Gruss CL, Al Komser M, Aghi MK , et al. Risk factors for cerebrospinal leak after endoscopic skull base reconstruction with nasoseptal flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151 (3) 516-521
• 13 Eldaly A, Magdy EA, Nour YA, Gaafar AH. Temporalis myofascial flap for primary cranial base reconstruction after tumor resection. Skull Base 2008; 18 (4) 253-263
• 14 Yano T, Okazaki M, Tanaka K, Iida H. The flap sandwich technique for a safe and aesthetic skull base reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (2) 193-197
• 15 Zeiler FA, Kaufmann AM. Vascularized rotational temporal bone flap for repair of anterior skull base defects: a novel operative technique. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (5) 1312-1315
• 16 Boudreaux B, Zins JE. Treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leaks in high-risk patients. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (3) 743-747
• 17 Scher RL, Cantrell RW. Anterior skull base reconstruction with the pericranial flap after craniofacial resection. Ear Nose Throat J 1992; 71 (5) 210-212 , 215–217
• 18 Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Rioja E, Enseñat J , et al. Management of anterior skull base defect depending on its size and location. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 346873
• 19 Newman J, O'Malley Jr BW, Chalian A, Brown MT. Microvascular reconstruction of cranial base defects: An evaluation of complication and survival rates to justify the use of this repair. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 132 (4) 381-384
• 20 Wei WI, Ng RW. Complications of resection of malignant tumours of the skull base: outcome and solution. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264 (7) 733-739
• 21 Taha AN, Almefty R, Pravdenkova S, Al-Mefty O. Sequelae of autologous fat graft used for reconstruction in skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2011; 75 (5–6) 692-695
• 22 Chin D, Harvey RJ. Endoscopic reconstruction of frontal, cribiform and ethmoid skull base defects. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 74: 104-118