J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77(06): 445-448
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1581065
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic Transmaxillary Transposition of Temporalis Flap for Recurrent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Closure

Regi Thomas
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Shabari Girishan
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Ari George Chacko
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

12 December 2015

17 February 2016

Publication Date:
31 March 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objective To describe the technique of endoscopic transmaxillary temporalis muscle flap transposition for the repair of a persistent postoperative sphenoidal cerebrospinal fluid leak.

Design The repair of a recurrent cerebrospinal fluid leak for a patient who had undergone endoscopic transsphenoidal excision of an invasive silent corticotroph Hardy C and Knosp Grade IV pituitary adenoma was undertaken. The patient had completed postoperative radiotherapy for the residual tumor and presented with cerebrospinal fluid leak, 1 year later. The initial two attempts to repair the cerebrospinal fluid leak with free grafts failed. Therefore, an endoscopic transmaxillary transposition of the temporalis muscle flap was attempted to stop the cerebrospinal fluid leak.

Results The endoscopic transmaxillary transposition of the vascularized temporalis muscle flap onto the cerebrospinal fluid leak repair site resulted in successful closure of the cerebrospinal fluid leak.

Conclusion Endoscopic transmaxillary transposition of the temporalis flap resulted in closure of recurrent cerebrospinal fluid leak in a patient with recurrent pituitary adenoma, who had undergone previous surgery and radiotherapy. This technique has advantages over the endoscopic transpterygoid transposition of the same flap and could be used as a complementary technique in selected patients.

Note

This paper was presented during the Annual Conference of Skull Base Society of India at Bangalore, October 2015, and has been cleared by the institutional review board.


 
  • References

  • 1 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
  • 2 Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL , et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (1) (Suppl. 01) ONS44-ONS52 , discussion ONS52–ONS53
  • 3 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL , et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (6) 1544-1568
  • 4 Patel MR, Taylor RJ, Hackman TG , et al. Beyond the nasoseptal flap: outcomes and pearls with secondary flaps in endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (4) 846-852
  • 5 Fortes FSG, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH , et al. Transpterygoid transposition of a temporoparietal fascia flap: a new method for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (6) 970-976
  • 6 Lund V, Stammberger H, Nicolai P , et al. European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of nose, paranasal sinus and skull base. Rhinol Suppl 2010; (Suppl. 22) 1-143
  • 7 Brent B, Upton J, Acland RD , et al. Experience with the temporoparietal fascial free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76 (2) 177-188
  • 8 Cheney ML, Varvares MA, Nadol Jr JB. The temporoparietal fascial flap in head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119 (6) 618-623
  • 9 Panje WR, Morris MR. The temporoparietal fascia flap in head and neck reconstruction. Ear Nose Throat J 1991; 70 (5) 311-317
  • 10 Kim YO, Park BY. Reverse temporalis muscle flap: treatment of large anterior cranial base defect with direct intracranial-nasopharyngeal communication. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (3) 576-584