Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2016; 37(02): 085-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1580741
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Analyzing Clinical Phonological Data Using Phon

Tara McAllister Byun
1   Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, New York, New York
,
Yvan Rose
2   Department of Linguistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 April 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In this article, we describe how Phon, an open-source software program for the transcription and analysis of phonological data, can be applied to facilitate clinical phonological analyses. We begin with a summary of the types of analyses that are frequently used in the assessment and management of speech sound disorders. We then discuss challenges inherent to the transcription and analysis of clinical phonological data. For each challenge, we discuss solutions currently available within Phon and offer an outlook on future methodological and technical developments in the area of clinical phonology. This article includes a step-by-step introduction to Phon suitable for readers who lack previous experience with the software. We conclude with a discussion of data sharing and its vital role in advancing research and intervention practices in the area of speech development and disorders.

Keywords

phonology - development - software - analysis - clinical assessment
 

  • References

  • 1 MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Rose Y, MacWhinney B, Byrne R, , et al. Introducing Phon: a software solution for the study of phonological acquisition. In: Bamman D, Magnitskaia T, Zaller C. eds. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press; 2006: 489-500
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rose Y, MacWhinney B. The PhonBank Project: data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In: Durand J, Gut U, Kristoffersen G, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2014: 380-401
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Ingram D. First Language Acquisition: Method, Description, and Explanation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Rose Y, Inkelas S. The interpretation of phonological patterns in first language acquisition. In: Ewen CJ, Hume E, Oostendorp Mvan, Rice K, eds. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011: 2414-2438
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Ingram D, Ingram KD. Commentary on “evaluating articulation and phonological disorders when the clock is running.”. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 11: 257-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Skahan SM, Watson M, Lof GL. Speech-language pathologists' assessment practices for children with suspected speech sound disorders: results of a national survey. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2007; 16 (3) 246-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rose Y, Stoel-Gammon C. Using PhonBank and Phon in studies of phonological development and disorders. Clin Linguist Phon 2015; 29 (8–10) 686-700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rose Y. The PhonBank Initiative and second language phonological development: innovative tools for research and data sharing. In: Henderson A, ed. English Pronunciation: Issues and Practices (EPIP)—Proceedings of the First International Conference. Chambéry, France: Université de Savoie; 2010:223–241
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hodson BW, Scherz JA, Strattman KH. Evaluating communicative abilities of a highly unintelligible preschooler. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 11 (3) 236-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hoffman PR, Norris JA. Phonological assessment as an integral part of language assessment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 11 (3) 230-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Williams AL. Prologue: perspectives in the assessment of children's speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 11 (3) 211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stoel-Gammon C. Phonetic inventories, 15-24 months: a longitudinal study. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28 (4) 505-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stoel-Gammon C. Prespeech and early speech development of two late talkers. First Lang 1989; 9 (26) 207-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Dyson AT. Phonetic inventories of 2- and 3-year-old children. J Speech Hear Disord 1988; 53 (1) 89-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rescorla L, Ratner NB. Phonetic profiles of toddlers with specific expressive language impairment (SLI-E). J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39 (1) 153-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Roberts J, Rescorla L, Giroux J, Stevens L. Phonological skills of children with specific expressive language impairment (SLI-E): outcome at age 3. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41 (2) 374-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Core C. Assessing phonological knowledge. In: Hoff E, ed. Research Methods in Child Language. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012: 77-99
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dinnsen DA. Context effects in the acquisition of fricatives. In: Bernhardt BH, Gilbert J, Ingram D, eds. Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press; 1996:136–148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Velleman SL. Metathesis highlights feature-by-position constraints. In: Bernhardt BH, Gilbert J, Ingram D, eds. Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press; 1996:173–186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Marshall C, Chiat S. A foot domain account of prosodically-conditioned substitutions. Clin Linguist Phon 2003; 17 (8) 645-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Inkelas S, Rose Y. Positional neutralization: a case study from child language. Language 2007; 83 (4) 707-736
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 McAllister Byun T. Positional velar fronting: an updated articulatory account. J Child Lang 2012; 39 (5) 1043-1076
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Eisenberg SL, Hitchcock ER. Using standardized tests to inventory consonant and vowel production: a comparison of 11 tests of articulation and phonology. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2010; 41 (4) 488-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stokes SF, Klee T, Carson CP, Carson D. A phonemic implicational feature hierarchy of phonological contrasts for English-speaking children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48 (4) 817-833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Miccio AW. Clinical problem solving: assessment of phonological disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 11 (3) 221-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Paul R, Jennings P. Phonological behavior in toddlers with slow expressive language development. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35 (1) 99-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pharr AB, Ratner NB, Rescorla L. Syllable structure development of toddlers with expressive specific language impairment. Appl Psycholinguist 2000; 21 (4) 429-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ingram D. Phonological Disability in Children. London, UK: Edward Arnold; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Williams AL, Elbert M. A prospective longitudinal study of phonological development in late talkers. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2003; 34 (2) 138-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hodson BW. HAPP-3: Hodson Assessment of Phonological Patterns. 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Grunwell P. The Nature of Phonological Disability in Children. London, UK: Academic Press; 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Bankson NW, Bernthal JE. Bankson–Bernthal Test of Phonology. Chicago, IL: Riverside Press; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Khan LM, Lewis NP. Khan–Lewis Phonological Analysis, 2nd ed. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Shriberg LD, Austin D, Lewis BA, McSweeny JL, Wilson DL. The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: extensions and reliability data. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40 (4) 708-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ingram D, Ingram KD. A whole-word approach to phonological analysis and intervention. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2001; 32 (4) 271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ingram D. The measurement of whole-word productions. J Child Lang 2002; 29 (4) 713-733
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Flipsen Jr P, Hammer JB, Yost KM. Measuring severity of involvement in speech delay: segmental and whole-word measures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2005; 14 (4) 298-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yorkston KM, Dowden PA, Beukelman DR. Intelligibility measurement as a tool in the clinical management of dysarthric speakers. In: Kent RD, ed. Intelligibility in Speech Disorders: Theory, Measurement and Management. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 1992: 265-285
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gordon-Brannan M, Hodson BW. Intelligibility/severity measurements of prekindergarten children's speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2000; 9 (2) 141-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Dodd B. Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Children with Speech Disorder. London, UK: Whurr Publishers; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Holm A, Crosbie S, Dodd B. Differentiating normal variability from inconsistency in children's speech: normative data. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2007; 42 (4) 467-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Fletcher SG. Palatometric specification of stop, affricate, and sibilant sounds. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32 (4) 736-748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Dell GS, Burger LK, Svec WR. Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model. Psychol Rev 1997; 104 (1) 123-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Goldman R, Fristoe M. Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation, 2nd ed. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Morrison JA, Shriberg LD. Articulation testing versus conversational speech sampling. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35 (2) 259-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bleile K. Evaluating articulation and phonological disorders when the clock is running. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002; 11 (3) 243-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Bernhardt BM, Stemberger J, Charest M. Intervention for speech production in children and adolescents: models of speech production and therapy approaches. Can J Speech-Lang Pathol Audiol Can Orthoph Audiol 2010; 34 (3) 157-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Bernhardt BM, Másdóttir T, Stemberger JP, Leonhardt L, Hansson GO. Fricative acquisition in English- and Icelandic-speaking preschoolers with protracted phonological development. Clin Linguist Phon 2015; 29 (8–10) 642-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Arias J, Lleó C. Rethinking assessment measures of phonological development and their application in bilingual acquisition. Clin Linguist Phon 2014; 28 (3) 153-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Hustad KC, Oakes A, Allison K. Variability and diagnostic accuracy of speech intelligibility scores in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58 (6) 1695-1707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Long SH, Fey ME. Computerized Profiling (PROPH+). Alexandria, VA: The Psychological Corporation; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Long SH, Fey ME, Channel RW. Computerized Profiling. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Bernhardt BH, Holdgrafer G. Beyond the basics I: the need for strategic sampling for in-depth phonological analysis. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2001; 32 (1) 18-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Brumbaugh KM, Smit AB. Treating children ages 3-6 who have speech sound disorder: a survey. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2013; 44 (3) 306-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar