Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32(02): 219-224
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579781
Rapid Communication
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Feeling Normal? Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with a Cleft Lip–Palate after Rhinoplasty with the Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59)

Andreas E. Albers
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Andreas C. Reichelt
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Gilbert J. Nolst-Trenité
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Facial Plastic Surgery, Jan van Goyen Kliniek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Dirk Jan Menger
3   Department of Ear, Nose, Throat – Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 April 2016 (online)


The stigma of nasal deformity due to a congenital cleft lip–palate has an undeniable influence on the affected patient's life. It is therefore of interest to investigate if efforts to reduce esthetic and functional impairments by rhinoplasty (single or multiple) can result in an increased satisfaction with appearance and a self-perception similar to the noncleft population. Retrospective scoring before and after rhinoplasty using the validated Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59) and subsequent statistical evaluation and comparison to datasets available in the literature for further classification was used. Of the 61 patients who underwent at least one rhinoplasty, 26 responded to all questions. The mean age of responders was approximately 30 years of age and the male:female ratio was 1:1.2. The scale showed a significant overall improvement after surgery. The full scale and all subscale scores of the DAS-59 were significantly reduced after surgery demonstrating an improvement in the respective categories. Most importantly, if postoperative results were compared with a population concerned and unconcerned about appearance, no difference “facial self-consciousness” of appearance was apparent. Also postoperative subscores for “general self-consciousness” (GSC) and “social self-consciousness” of appearance (SSC) showed no difference from those obtained from the population concerned about appearance. The postoperative subscore for “sexual and bodily self-consciousness” of appearance (SBSC) indicated improvement beyond the level found in the concerned control population. Due to only a low improvement in the difference compared with the subscore representing a “negative self-concept,” a statistically significant difference to the concerned population remained, possibly indicating that therapy beyond surgery is needed for improvement. After rhinoplasty, the investigated group of cleft lip–palate patients with nasal deformities showed an improvement in their self-conceived appearance as measured by the DAS-59. Their assessment of self-appearance was comparable to that of a group of noncleft persons with concern about their appearance. Taken together, rhinoplasties, primary and revision, add to the psychosocial well-being and an improved self-perception enhancing quality of life and enabling a more normal life. Further research is needed to clarify how the low reduction found in the “negative self-concept” may be addressed successfully.

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization Human Genetics Programme World atlas of birth defects. 1st ed. International Centre for Birth Defects (ICBD) of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems in collaboration with European Registration of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT), 1998
  • 2 Hemprich A. Die interdisziplinäre Behandlung von Patienten mit Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumen-Spalten. Der MKG-Chirurg 2011; 4: 323-334
  • 3 Stock NM, Feragen KB, Rumsey N. “It doesn't all just stop at 18”: psychological adjustment and support needs of adults born with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2015; 52 (5) 543-554
  • 4 Queiroz Herkrath AP, Herkrath FJ, Rebelo MA, Vettore MV. Measurement of health-related and oral health-related quality of life among individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2015; 52 (2) 157-172
  • 5 Colbert SD, Green B, Brennan PA, Mercer N. Contemporary management of cleft lip and palate in the United Kingdom. Have we reached the turning point?. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53 (7) 594-598
  • 6 Greives MR, Camison L, Losee JE. Evidence-based medicine: unilateral cleft lip and nose repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (6) 1372-1380
  • 7 Chaithanyaa N, Rai KK, Shivakumar HR, Upasi A. Evaluation of the outcome of secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (1) 27-33
  • 8 Kane AA, Pilgram TK, Moshiri M, Marsh JL. Long-term outcome of cleft lip nasal reconstruction in childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (5) 1600-1608
  • 9 Gassling V, Koos B, Birkenfeld F, Wiltfang J, Zimmermann CE. Secondary cleft nose rhinoplasty: subjective and objective outcome evaluation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (9) 1855-1862
  • 10 Eckstein DA, Wu RL, Akinbiyi T, Silver L, Taub PJ. Measuring quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients: currently available patient-reported outcomes measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (5) 518e-526e
  • 11 Carr T, Harris D, James C. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59): a new scale to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol 2000; 5: 201-215
  • 12 Harris DL, Carr AT. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54 (3) 216-222
  • 13 Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol 2005; 10 (Pt 2) 285-298
  • 14 Hens G, Picavet VA, Poorten VV, Schoenaers J, Jorissen M, Hellings PW. High patient satisfaction after secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2011; 1 (3) 167-172
  • 15 Hellings PW, Nolst Trenité GJ. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (6) 985-989
  • 16 Nolst Trenité GJ, Paping RH, Trenning AH. Rhinoplasty in the cleft lip patient. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34 (1) 63-68
  • 17 Verwoerd CD, Mladina R, Nolst Trenité GJ, Pigott RW. The nose in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 32 (Suppl): S45-S52
  • 18 Roosenboom J, Hellings PW, Picavet VA , et al. Secondary cleft rhinoplasty: impact on self-esteem and quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (6) 1285-1292
  • 19 Huempfner-Hierl H, Hemprich A, Hierl T. Results of a prospective anthropometric and functional study about aesthetics and nasal respiration after secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (Suppl. 02) 1863-1875
  • 20 Günel C, Omurlu IK. The effect of rhinoplasty on psychosocial distress level and quality of life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (8) 1931-1935
  • 21 Litner JA, Rotenberg BW, Dennis M, Adamson PA. Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on satisfaction with appearance and quality of life. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (2) 79-83