Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 20(03): 222-225
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579664
Original Research
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

The Effect of Propolis in Healing Injured Nasal Mucosa: An Experimental Study

Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
,
Said Abdelmonem
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
,
Ahmed A. Abdelsameea
2   Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
,
Mohamed AlShawadfy
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
,
Kamal El-Kashishy
3   Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

28. Oktober 2015

16. Dezember 2015

Publikationsdatum:
26. Februar 2016 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Mechanical trauma to the nasal mucosa increases the risk of synechia formation, especially after chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal surgeries.

Objective This study was carried to assess the effect of propolis administration in healing injured nasal mucosa in rats.

Methods We randomly divided eighteen rats into three equal experimental groups: (1) non-treated group; (2) gum tragacanth (suspending agent for propolis) treated group; and (3) propolis treated group. The non-treated group received no treatment for 15 days. The second group received gum tragacanth administration (5 ml/kg, orally) once daily for 15 days. The third group received propolis suspension orally at a dose of 100 mg/kg once daily for 15 days. At the beginning of this study, we induced unilateral mechanical nasal trauma on the right nasal mucosa of all rats in the three groups using a brushing technique. A pathologist stained tissue samples using hematoxylin and examined eosin by using a light microscope.

Results The severity of inflammation was milder with the absence of ulcerations in the propolis treated group compared with the non-treated and gum tragacanth groups. Goblet cell and ciliated cell loss was substantially lower in patients treated with propolis compared with groups without treatment and those treated with gum tragacanth.

Conclusion Propolis decreased inflammation and enhanced healing of wounds of the nasal mucosa in rats.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kınıs V, Ozbay M, Akdag M , et al. Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on wound healing of nasal mucosa in the rat: an experimental study. Am J Otolaryngol 2014; 35 (4) 482-486
  • 2 Staffieri A, Marino F, Staffieri C , et al. The effects of sulfurous-arsenical-ferruginous thermal water nasal irrigation in wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective randomized study. Am J Otolaryngol 2008; 29 (4) 223-229
  • 3 Wagh VD. Propolis: a wonder bees product and its pharmacological potentials. Adv Pharmacol Sci 2013; 2013: 308249
  • 4 Banskota AH, Nagaoka T, Sumioka LY , et al. Antiproliferative activity of the Netherlands propolis and its active principles in cancer cell lines. J Ethnopharmacol 2002; 80 (1) 67-73
  • 5 Grunberger D, Banerjee R, Eisinger K , et al. Preferential cytotoxicity on tumor cells by caffeic acid phenethyl ester isolated from propolis. Experientia 1988; 44 (3) 230-232
  • 6 Talas ZS, Ozdemir I, Ciftci O, Cakir O, Gulhan MF, Pasaoglu OM. Role of propolis on biochemical parameters in kidney and heart tissues against L-NAME induced oxidative injury in rats. Clin Exp Hypertens 2014; 36 (7) 492-496
  • 7 Gekker G, Hu S, Spivak M, Lokensgard JR, Peterson PK. Anti-HIV-1 activity of propolis in CD4(+) lymphocyte and microglial cell cultures. J Ethnopharmacol 2005; 102 (2) 158-163
  • 8 Astani A, Zimmermann S, Hassan E, Reichling J, Sensch KH, Schnitzler P. Antimicrobial activity of propolis special extract GH 2002 against multidrug-resistant clinical isolates. Pharmazie 2013; 68 (8) 695-701
  • 9 Liu Y, Min D, Bolton T , et al. Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 predicts poor wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 2009; 32 (1) 117-119
  • 10 Gallo E, Lucenteforte E, Firenzuoli F , et al. Herbalists' perception of risks involving commonly sold medicinal plants in Italy. Complement Ther Med 2014; 22 (1) 81-86
  • 11 Khalmuratova R, Jeon SY, Kim DW , et al. Wound healing of nasal mucosa in a rat. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009; 23 (6) e33-e37
  • 12 Shukla S, Bhadauria M, Jadon A. Effect of propolis extract on acute carbon tetrachloride induced hepatotoxicity. Indian J Exp Biol 2004; 42 (10) 993-997
  • 13 McLennan SV, Bonner J, Milne S , et al. The anti-inflammatory agent Propolis improves wound healing in a rodent model of experimental diabetes. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16 (5) 706-713
  • 14 Henshaw FR, Bolton T, Nube V , et al. Topical application of the bee hive protectant propolis is well tolerated and improves human diabetic foot ulcer healing in a prospective feasibility study. J Diabetes Complications 2014; 28 (6) 850-857
  • 15 Havsteen BH. The biochemistry and medical significance of the flavonoids. Pharmacol Ther 2002; 96 (2–3) 67-202
  • 16 Marcucci MC. Propolis: Chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie (Celle) 1995; 26: 83-99
  • 17 Lopes RE, Chapadeiro E, Raso P , et al. Patologia. Guanabara 1987 ; 67–112
  • 18 Borrelli F, Maffia P, Pinto L , et al. Phytochemical compounds involved in the anti-inflammatory effect of propolis extract. Fitoterapia 2002; 73 (1) S53-S63