Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2016; 01(01): 012-018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571278
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reconstruction of the Lower Extremity with Cross-Leg Free Flaps

Ozlenen Ozkan
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
,
Anı Cinpolat
2   Private Practice, Ataturk bul. Gokay Plaza no 1 konyaaltı, Antalya, Turkey
,
Gamze Bektas
2   Private Practice, Ataturk bul. Gokay Plaza no 1 konyaaltı, Antalya, Turkey
,
Arzu Akcal
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
,
Harun Simsek
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
,
Polat Bicici
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
,
Seckin Aydın Savas
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
,
Kerim Unal
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
,
Omer Ozkan
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 August 2015

28 November 2015

Publication Date:
15 February 2016 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The absence of suitable adjacent recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis due to trauma poses a major challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. The anterior and posterior tibial vessels of the contralateral leg are the two other alternatives for use as recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis. This method is known as the cross-leg free flap.

Methods Twenty-seven patients (20 males, 7 females) underwent cross-leg free flap operations due to absence of a suitable adjacent recipient vessel between 2007 and 2015. The mean soft tissue defect dimension was 12 × 11 cm (smallest: 6 × 7 cm; largest: 20 ×14 cm). Gustilo type 3B tibia fractures were present in 19 patients, but no fractures were present in the other 8. Six different flaps were used: 14 anterolateral thigh flaps, 6 latissimus dorsi flaps, 3 gracilis muscle flaps, 2 vastus lateralis musculocutaneous flaps, 1 tensor fascia latae flap, and 1 deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.

Results Two anterolateral thigh flaps failed, while the rest of the flaps survived completely. There were no donor-site complications.

Conclusion We think that the cross-leg free flap method can be safely and successfully used with all flap types in complex lower extremity injuries in which the adjacent recipient vessel option is unavailable.

Keywords

cross-leg - lower extremity reconstruction - vein grafts
 

  • References

  • 1 Scott LL, Baumeister S. Lower extremity. In: Wei FC, Mardini S, eds. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2009: 62-70
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Economides JM, Patel KM, Evans KK, Marshall E, Attinger CE. Systematic review of patient-centered outcomes following lower extremity flap reconstruction in comorbid patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (5) 307-316
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cho EH, Garcia RM, Blau J , et al. Microvascular anastomoses using end-to-end versus end-to-side technique in lower extremity free tissue transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (2) 114-120
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kolbenschlag J, Hellmich S, Germann G, Megerle K. Free tissue transfer in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease: functional outcome in reconstruction of chronic lower extremity defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (9) 607-614
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fischer JP, Wink JD, Nelson JA , et al. A retrospective review of outcomes and flap selection in free tissue transfers for complex lower extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (6) 407-416
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chen H, El-Gammal TA, Wei F, Chen H, Noordhoff MS, Tang Y. Cross-leg free flaps for difficult cases of leg defects: indications, pitfalls, and long-term results. J Trauma 1997; 43 (3) 486-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bayramiçli M, Tetik C, Sönmez A, Gürünlüoğlu R, Baltaci F. Reliability of primary vein grafts in lower extremity free tissue transfers. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48 (1) 21-29
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Whitney TM, Buncke HJ, Lineaweaver WC, Alpert BS. Multiple microvascular transplants: a preliminary report of simultaneous versus sequential reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1989; 22 (5) 391-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Luo SK, Gao JH, Luo JH. A case report of cross-leg free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap transplantation. Eur J Plast Surg 1999; 22: 329-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Khouri RK, Shaw WW. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1989; 29 (8) 1086-1094
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Taylor GI, Townsend P, Corlett R. Superiority of the deep circumflex iliac vessels as the supply for free groin flaps. Clinical work. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64 (6) 745-759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yu L, Tan J, Cai L , et al. Repair of severe composite tissue defects in the lower leg using two different cross-leg free composite tissue flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (1) 83-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Yu ZJ, Tang CH, He HG. Cross-bridge transplantation of free latissimus dorsi skin flap in one case. Chin Med J (Engl) 1983; 96 (10) 772-776
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Townsend PLG. Indications and long-term assessment of 10 cases of cross-leg free DCIA flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1987; 19 (3) 225-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yu ZJ, Tang CH, Ho HG. Cross-bridge free skin flap transfer: case report. J Reconstr Microsurg 1985; 1 (4) 309-311
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Akyürek M, Safak T, Ozkan O, Keçik A. Technique to re-establish continuity of the recipient artery after end-to-end anastomoses in cross-leg free flap procedure. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49 (4) 430-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Brenman SA, Barber WB, Pederson WC, Barwick WJ. Pedicled free flaps: indications in complex reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1990; 24 (5) 420-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lin CH, Mardini S, Lin YT, Yeh JT, Wei FC, Chen HC. Sixty-five clinical cases of free tissue transfer using long arteriovenous fistulas or vein grafts. J Trauma 2004; 56 (5) 1107-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yu ZJ, Huang MJ, Zheng L. Influence of pedicle severance at different time on the survival of canine skin flap. Chin Med J (Engl) 1984; 64: 449
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yu ZJ, Zeng BF, Huang YC , et al. Application of the cross-bridge microvascular anastomosis when no recipient vessels are available for anastomosis: 85 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (5) 1099-1107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kobus K. Free transplantation of tissues: problems and complications. Ann Plast Surg 1988; 20 (1) 55-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hao YB. Free flap transfer by bridge vascular anastomosis. Chin J Plast Burn Surg 1981; 7: 271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Liu ZX. Repair of tissue defects with free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap transfer by bridge vascular anastomosis: Report of three cases. Chin J Microsurg 1990; 13: 38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lai CS, Lin SD, Chou CK, Cheng YM. Use of a cross-leg free muscle flap to reconstruct an extensive burn wound involving a lower extremity. Burns 1991; 17 (6) 510-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sharma RK, Kola G. Cross leg posterior tibial artery fasciocutaneous island flap for reconstruction of lower leg defects. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 45 (1) 62-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cinpolat A, Bektas G, Coskunfirat N, Rizvanovic Z, Coskunfirat OK. Comparing various surgical delay methods with ischemic preconditioning in the rat TRAM flap model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (5) 335-342
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pei GX, Xie CP, Li QD. Musculocutaneous flap transfer bridged by the posterior tibial vessels from the healthy limb in the reconstruction of severe lower limb trauma. Chin J Traumatol 1992; 8: 266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Topalan M. A new and safer anastomosis technique in cross-leg free flap procedure using the dorsalis pedis arterial system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (2) 710-713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Yamamoto M, Kaji S, Mrakami Y, Yamanobe Y, Nakamura M. The use of a crossleg free flap for the repair of an extensive injury of the lower extremities. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 35: 539
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ding SY. Treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of leg with free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap anastomosed to contralateral leg vessels [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Wai Ke Za Zhi 1993; 9 (2) 106-107 , 159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yamada A, Harii K, Ueda K, Asato H, Tanaka H. Versatility of a cross-leg free rectus abdominis flap for leg reconstruction under difficult and unfavorable conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (7) 1253-1257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Cheng MH, Chen HC, Wei FC, Su SW, Lian SH, Brey E. Devices for ischemic preconditioning of the pedicled groin flap. J Trauma 2000; 48 (3) 552-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar