Subscribe to RSS
Nanofibrous Synthetic Dural Patch for Skull Base Defects: Preliminary Experience for Reconstruction after Extended Endonasal Approaches
29 March 2015
07 November 2015
01 March 2016 (online)
Setting One of the consequences of the widespread use of endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to skull base pathologies is the management of complex skull base defects. Nowadays, the gold standard is a multilayer closure that reproduces the physiological tissue barriers. Several techniques have been described in the literature; however, skull base reconstruction after EEA still represents a matter of debate, especially after extended EEA. A watertight closure is paramount to prevent cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis.
Design Regarding this issue, we present our experience with a new synthetic dural patch, ReDura (Medprin Biotech, La Mirada, California, United States), as a subdural inlay in three patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal removal of sellar and suprasellar lesions.
Conclusions ReDura patch showed the same versatility of autologous iliotibial tract. A dural patch that easily adapts to all defects, revealed to be a useful tool for performing watertight closure, possibly in a short operative time, after endoscopic approaches.
- 1 Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Paluzzi A, Wang EW, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for giant pituitary adenomas: advantages and limitations. J Neurosurg 2013; 118 (3) 621-631
- 2 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
- 3 Villaret AB, Schreiber A, Battaglia P, Bignami M. Endoscopy-assisted iliotibial tract harvesting for skull base reconstruction: feasibility on a cadaveric model. Skull Base 2011; 21 (3) 185-188
- 4 Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E3
- 5 Soudry E, Turner JH, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Endoscopic reconstruction of surgically created skull base defects: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 150 (5) 730-738
- 6 Paluzzi A, Gardner P, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman C. The expanding role of endoscopic skull base surgery. Br J Neurosurg 2012; 26 (5) 649-661
- 7 Malliti M, Page P, Gury C, Chomette E, Nataf F, Roux FX. Comparison of deep wound infection rates using a synthetic dural substitute (neuro-patch) or pericranium graft for dural closure: a clinical review of 1 year. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (3) 599-603 , discussion 603–604
- 8 Thorp BD, Sreenath SB, Ebert CS, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (4) E4
- 9 Weber R, Keerl R, Draf W, Schick B, Mosler P, Saha A. Management of dural lesions occurring during endonasal sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (7) 732-736
- 10 Kurpinski K, Patel S. Dura mater regeneration with a novel synthetic, bilayered nanofibrous dural substitute: an experimental study. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2011; 6 (2) 325-337
- 11 Shi ZD, Xu T, Yuan YY , et al. Use of novel regenerative nanofibrous bio-device for dural defect repair. Paper presented at: EANS/The14th European Congress of Neurosurgery; 2011; Rome, Italy
- 12 Tabaee A, Anand VK, Brown SM, Lin JW, Schwartz TH. Algorithm for reconstruction after endoscopic pituitary and skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (7) 1133-1137