Am J Perinatol 2016; 33(06): 547-551
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570339
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Abdominal Incision Selection for Cesarean Delivery of Women with Class III Obesity

Amelia L. Sutton
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Lauren B. Sanders
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Akila Subramaniam
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Victoria C. Jauk
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Rodney K. Edwards
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

09 June 2015

04 November 2015

Publication Date:
21 December 2015 (online)

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate cesarean outcomes, stratified by abdominal incision type, in women with class III obesity.

Study Design We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with class III obesity undergoing cesarean at our institution from 2010 to 2013 with singletons ≥ 34 weeks. Outcomes were compared between patients with transverse subpannicular and vertical abdominal incisions. The primary outcome was a wound composite (cellulitis, abscess, hematoma, seroma, or dehiscence). Other outcomes included transfusion, vertical hysterotomy, 5-minute Apgar < 7, and umbilical artery pH < 7.10.

Results Of 423 patients, 364 had subpannicular transverse, 57 had vertical, and 2 had periumbilical transverse incisions (not analyzed). Although vertical incisions were associated with more wound complications (26.3 vs. 14.8%; p = 0.03), the difference became null after adjustment (adjusted odds ratios [aOR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7, 4.1). Vertical incisions were associated with increased risk of vertical hysterotomy (aOR 4.8; 95% CI, 2.2, 10.4), decreased risk of 5-minute Apgar < 7 (aOR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.004, 0.9), and not statistically significantly associated with transfusion (aOR, 4.2; 95% CI, 0.9, 19.0) or umbilical artery pH < 7.1 (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.11, 1.7).

Conclusions In women with class III obesity cesarean delivery via vertical abdominal incisions is associated with more maternal but less immediate neonatal complications.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 2014; 311 (8) 806-814
  • 2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (1) 213-217
  • 3 Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP , et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25 (8) 1175-1182
  • 4 Jensen DM, Damm P, Sørensen B , et al. Pregnancy outcome and prepregnancy body mass index in 2459 glucose-tolerant Danish women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (1) 239-244
  • 5 Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D , et al; FASTER Research Consortium. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate—a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (4) 1091-1097
  • 6 Perlow JH, Morgan MA. Massive maternal obesity and perioperative cesarean morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170 (2) 560-565
  • 7 Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Maternal obesity and risk of postcesarean wound complications. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (4) 299-304
  • 8 Wall PD, Deucy EE, Glantz JC, Pressman EK. Vertical skin incisions and wound complications in the obese parturient. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 (5 Pt 1) 952-956
  • 9 Bell J, Bell S, Vahratian A, Awonuga AO. Abdominal surgical incisions and perioperative morbidity among morbidly obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 154 (1) 16-19
  • 10 Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (3) 271.e1-271.e7
  • 11 Landon MB, Bergella V. Cesarean delivery. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Landon MB, Galan HL, Jauniaux ERM, Driscoll DA, eds. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingston; 2012: 445-478
  • 12 Thornburg LL, Linder MA, Durie DE, Walker B, Pressman EK, Glantz JC. Risk factors for wound complications in morbidly obese women undergoing primary cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25 (9) 1544-1548
  • 13 Tixier H, Thouvenot S, Coulange L , et al. Cesarean section in morbidly obese women: supra or subumbilical transverse incision?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88 (9) 1049-1052
  • 14 Marrs CC, Moussa HN, Sibai BM, Blackwell SC. The relationship between primary cesarean delivery skin incision type and wound complications in women with morbid obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (4) 319.e1-319.e4
  • 15 Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Wiggs CD, Barrilleaux PS, Martin Jr JN. Pregnancy after classic cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100 (5 Pt 1) 946-950
  • 16 Edwards RK, Cantu J, Cliver S, Biggio Jr JR, Owen J, Tita AT. The association of maternal obesity with fetal pH and base deficit at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (2 Pt 1) 262-267
  • 17 Conner SN, Tuuli MG, Longman RE, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Impact of obesity on incision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (4) 386.e1-386.e6