Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32(01): 017-021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570323
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Nasal Airway: A Critical Review

Capi C. Wever
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 February 2016 (online)

Abstract

Functional nasal surgery is frequently performed and deeply embedded in otolaryngology. However, unequivocal proof of its efficacy is still pending, leading some health authorities toward restrictive policies. In this article, we review the evidence and suggest that reexamining the paradigm of functional nasal surgery may be appropriate.

 
  • References

  • 1 Vainio-Mattila J. Correlations of nasal symptoms and signs in random sampling study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1974; 318: 1-48
  • 2 Jessen M, Ivarsson A, Malm L. Nasal airway resistance and symptoms after functional septoplasty: comparison of findings at 9 months and 9 years. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1989; 14 (3) 231-234
  • 3 Open DIS Data. Available at: www.opendisdata.nl
  • 4 Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: demographics and perioperative outcomes. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (3) 635-638
  • 5 Moore M, Eccles R. Objective evidence for the efficacy of surgical management of the deviated septum as a treatment for chronic nasal obstruction: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 2011; 36 (2) 106-113
  • 6 Praktijkvariatie KNO: concept analyse septumchirurgie en bijholte chirurgie. DBC onderhoud 2015.
  • 7 Dartmouth Atlas. Available at: www.dartmouthatlas.org
  • 8 Lee MK, Most SP. Evidence-based medicine: rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23 (3) 303-312
  • 9 Roblin DG, Eccles R. What, if any, is the value of septal surgery?. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002; 27 (2) 77-80
  • 10 Nasal Septal Surgery. ENTUK position paper 2010. London, England: ENT UK; 2010
  • 11 Eccles R. Nasal airflow in health and disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120 (5) 580-595
  • 12 Cole P. Nasal and oral airflow resistors. Site, function, and assessment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118 (8) 790-793
  • 13 Keck T, Lindemann J. Numerical simulation and nasal air-conditioning. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 9: Doc08
  • 14 Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvåg SK. Does nasal obstruction mean that the nose is obstructed?. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (8) 1476-1481
  • 15 Clement PA, Halewyck S, Gordts F, Michel O. Critical evaluation of different objective techniques of nasal airway assessment: a clinical review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 271 (10) 2617-2625
  • 16 Naito K, Iwata S. Current advances in rhinomanometry. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997; 254 (7) 309-312
  • 17 Chaves C, de Andrade CR, Ibiapina C. Objective measures for functional diagnostic of the upper airways: practical aspects. Rhinology 2014; 52 (2) 99-103
  • 18 André RF, Vuyk HD, Ahmed A, Graamans K, Nolst Trenité GJ. Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol 2009; 34 (6) 518-525
  • 19 Jessen M, Malm L. The importance of nasal airway resistance and nasal symptoms in the selection of patients for septoplasty. Rhinology 1984; 22 (3) 157-164
  • 20 Wang T, Han D, Zhang L, Zang H, Li Y, Liu C. A modified septoplasty with three high tension lines resection. Acta Otolaryngol 2010; 130 (5) 593-599
  • 21 Singh A, Patel N, Kenyon G, Donaldson G. Is there objective evidence that septal surgery improves nasal airflow?. J Laryngol Otol 2006; 120 (11) 916-920
  • 22 Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45 (12) 1829-1843
  • 23 Lipan MJ, Most SP. Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (5) 358-361
  • 24 Rhee JS, Arganbright JM, McMullin BT, Hannley M. Evidence supporting functional rhinoplasty or nasal valve repair: A 25-year systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 139 (1) 10-20
  • 25 Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11 (4) 319-328
  • 26 Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I—Important general considerations. BMJ 1991; 302 (6781) 887-889
  • 27 Lam DJ, James KT, Weaver EM. Comparison of anatomic, physiological, and subjective measures of the nasal airway. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20 (5) 463-470
  • 28 Naito K, Iwata S, Kondo M, Ohoka E, Cole P. A fundamental study of rhinomanometry and its clinical application to objective evaluation. Auris Nasus Larynx 1989; 16 (2) 99-108
  • 29 Surowitz J, Lee MK, Most SP. Anterior septal reconstruction for treatment of severe caudal septal deviations: clinical severity and outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153 (1) 27-33
  • 30 Batra PS, Seiden AM, Smith TL. Surgical management of adult inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a systematic review of the evidence. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (9) 1819-1827
  • 31 Spielmann PM, White PS, Hussain SS. Surgical techniques for the treatment of nasal valve collapse: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (7) 1281-1290
  • 32 Voerman MS, Langeveld AP, van Rossum MA. Retrospective study of 116 patients with non-organic voice disorders: efficacy of mental imagery and laryngeal shaking. J Laryngol Otol 2009; 123 (5) 528-534
  • 33 Kimbell JS, Garcia GJ, Frank DO, Cannon DE, Pawar SS, Rhee JS. Computed nasal resistance compared with patient-reported symptoms in surgically treated nasal airway passages: a preliminary report. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012; 26 (3) e94-e98
  • 34 Rotenberg BW, Pang KP. The impact of sinus surgery on sleep outcomes. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2015; 5 (4) 329-332
  • 35 Kotecha B. The nose, snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea. Rhinology 2011; 49 (3) 259-263
  • 36 Becker DG, Ransom E, Guy C, Bloom J. Surgical treatment of nasal obstruction in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2010; 30 (3) 347-378 , quiz 379–380