Rectangular Tubular Retractor for Microendoscopic Lumbar Decompression

Abstract

Background A cylindrical working tube with a diameter of 16 mm has been used for endoscopic posterior lumbar spinal surgery. However, intraoperative muscle resection is significant when using the current conventional tubular retractor.

Objective To describe a novel tubular retractor for microendoscopic surgery and to analyze the outcomes of lumbar decompressive laminotomy using this retractor.

Materials and Methods We devised a novel tubular retractor by changing the medial and lateral sides of the conventional 16-mm cylindrical tubular retractor to planes with a mediolateral dimension of 10 mm (rectangular tubular retractor hereafter). The amount of muscle resection, osteotomy angle on the approach side, and operating time were compared between 25 intervertebral levels treated by bilateral decompression through a unilateral approach using the rectangular tubular retractor and 31 intervertebral levels treated with the same surgery using a 16-mm cylindrical tubular retractor.

Results Due to the short mediolateral dimension, muscle resection decreased by 86%. The rectangular tubular retractor also decreased early postoperative wound pain. Because the craniocaudal dimension of the tubular retractor was maintained, surgical difficulty did not increase, resulting in only a slight increase in operating time. The facet joint on the approach side could be sufficiently preserved.

Conclusions The rectangular tubular retractor reduced surgical invasiveness without increasing surgical difficulty.

Keywords

paravertebral muscle - lumbar spinal stenosis - minimally invasive surgery

• References

• 1 Foley KT, Smith MM. Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 1997; 3: 301-307
• 2 Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 2002; 27 (4) 432-438
• 3 Khoo LT, Fessler RG. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (5, Suppl): S146-S154
• 4 Podichetty VK, Spears J, Isaacs RE, Booher J, Biscup RS. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19 (3) 161-166
• 5 Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T , et al. Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 2 (5) 624-633
• 6 Yagi M, Okada E, Ninomiya K, Kihara M. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 10 (4) 293-299
• 7 Sasaoka R, Nakamura H, Konishi S , et al. Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (5) 577-582
• 8 Shin DA, Kim KN, Shin HC, Yoon DH. The efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy in reducing iatrogenic muscle injury. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 8 (1) 39-43
• 9 Nakamura S, Shibayama M, Ito F, Miura Y. A new angled chisel for microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; October 16 ( Epub ahead of print).
• 10 Ikuta K, Tono O, Tanaka T , et al. Surgical complications of microendoscopic procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007; 50 (3) 145-149
• 11 Wada K, Sairyo K, Sakai T, Yasui N. Minimally invasive endoscopic bilateral decompression with a unilateral approach (endo-BiDUA) for elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010; 53 (2) 65-68
• 12 Sairyo K, Sakai T, Higashino K, Inoue M, Yasui N, Dezawa A. Complications of endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010; 53 (4) 175-178
• 13 Ebata S, Sato H, Orii H, Sasaki S, Ohba T, Haro H. Risk management in posterior spinal endoscopic surgery in lumbar diseases. J Orthop Sci 2013; 18 (3) 369-373
• 14 Mikami Y, Nagae M, Ikeda T, Tonomura H, Fujiwara H, Kubo T. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a technical note. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (9) 2105-2112
• 15 Arai Y, Shinomia K, Okawa A , et al. Comparison between endoscopic and microscopic lumbar decompression using tubular retractor to perform minimally invasive surgery. J Japan Soc Spine Surg Rel Res 2007; 18: 654-657