AJP Rep 2016; 06(01): e18-e24
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566313
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Obstetrician and Gynecologist Utilization of the Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Expanded Option

Sarah Mayes
1   Genetic Counseling Program, University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Science at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Syed Hashmi
2   Department of Pediatrics, The University of Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Mark A. Turrentine
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, Texas
,
Sandra Darilek
4   Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Lara A. Friel
5   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Jennifer Czerwinski
5   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

06 July 2015

15 August 2015

Publication Date:
29 October 2015 (online)

Abstract

Objective Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) enables the detection of common fetal aneuploidies such as trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and sex chromosome abnormalities via analysis of cell-free fetal DNA circulating in maternal serum. In October 2013, the option to screen for additional trisomies and select microdeletion syndromes became clinically available. The complex testing methods, oftentimes unclear clinical utility of results, and lack of professional guidelines renders it challenging for clinicians to keep abreast of evolving prenatal screening options. We undertook a survey to assess physicians' awareness of, utilization of, and attitudes toward the expanded NIPT option.

Study Design Obstetricians attending hospital service meetings in the Houston Texas Medical Center completed an anonymous survey regarding the utilization patterns of expanded NIPT.

Results Overall, 85 obstetricians were surveyed. While all respondents indicated awareness of NIPT in its traditional form, 75% (64/85) were aware of the expanded testing option, and 14% (12/85) reported having ordered the expanded NIPT option. A total of 91% (77/85) expressed that practitioners need more information regarding the screening.

Conclusion Based on these findings and the fluid landscape of prenatal screening, education, and reeducation of health care professionals is imperative to ensure responsible patient counseling, informed consent, and appropriate posttest management.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chen S, Lau TK, Zhang C , et al. A method for noninvasive detection of fetal large deletions/duplications by low coverage massively parallel sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33 (6) 584-590
  • 2 Palomaki GE, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM , et al. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study. Genet Med 2011; 13 (11) 913-920
  • 3 Palomaki GE, Deciu C, Kloza EM , et al. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study. Genet Med 2012; 14 (3) 296-305
  • 4 Bianchi DW, Platt LD, Goldberg JD, Abuhamad AZ, Sehnert AJ, Rava RP ; MatErnal BLood IS Source to Accurately diagnose fetal aneuploidy (MELISSA) Study Group. Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (5) 890-901
  • 5 Norton ME, Brar H, Weiss J , et al. Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207 (2) 137.e1-137.e8
  • 6 Mazloom AR, Džakula Ž, Oeth P , et al. Noninvasive prenatal detection of sex chromosomal aneuploidies by sequencing circulating cell-free DNA from maternal plasma. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33 (6) 591-597
  • 7 Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J , et al; CARE Study Group. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N Engl J Med 2014; 370 (9) 799-808
  • 8 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 545: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (6) 1532-1534
  • 9 Wilson KL, Czerwinski JL, Hoskovec JM , et al. NSGC practice guideline: prenatal screening and diagnostic testing options for chromosome aneuploidy. J Genet Couns 2013; 22 (1) 4-15
  • 10 Benn P, Borell A, Chiu R , et al. Position statement from the aneuploidy screening committee on behalf of the board of the international society for prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33 (7) 622-629
  • 11 Bianchi DW, Wilkins-Haug L. Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road?. Clin Chem 2014; 60 (1) 78-87
  • 12 Jensen TJ, Dzakula Z, Deciu C, van den Boom D, Ehrich M. Detection of microdeletion 22q11.2 in a fetus by next-generation sequencing of maternal plasma. Clin Chem 2012; 58 (7) 1148-1151
  • 13 Peters D, Chu T, Yatsenko SA , et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of a fetal microdeletion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (19) 1847-1848
  • 14 Srinivasan A, Bianchi DW, Huang H, Sehnert AJ, Rava RP. Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma. Am J Hum Genet 2013; 92 (2) 167-176
  • 15 Yu SC, Jiang P, Choy KW , et al. Noninvasive prenatal molecular karyotyping from maternal plasma. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 (4) e60968
  • 16 Jia Y, Zhao H, Shi D , et al. Genetic effects of a 13q31.1 microdeletion detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014; 7 (10) 7003-7011
  • 17 Rampášek L, Arbabi A, Brudno M. Probabilistic method for detecting copy number variation in a fetal genome using maternal plasma sequencing. Bioinformatics 2014; 30 (12) i212-i218
  • 18 Zhao C, Tynan J, Ehrich M , et al. Detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities by sequencing circulating cell-free DNA from maternal plasma. Clin Chem 2015; 61 (4) 608-616
  • 19 Wapner RJ, Babiarz JE, Levy B , et al. Expanding the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing: detection of fetal microdeletion syndromes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (3) 332.e1-332.e9
  • 20 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Publications Committee. #36: Prenatal aneuploidy screening using cell-free DNA. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (6) 711-716
  • 21 Benn P, Borrell A, Chiu RW , et al. Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35 (8) 725-734
  • 22 Natera, Inc . Panoramatest. Available at: http://www.panoramatest.com/healthcare-provider . Accessed March 26, 2015
  • 23 Edwards JG, Feldman G, Goldberg J , et al. Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (3) 653-662
  • 24 Benn P, Chapman AR, Erickson K , et al. Obstetricians and gynecologists' practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34 (2) 145-152