Synlett 2016; 27(02): 262-266
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1560644
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

An Orthogonal Biocatalytic Approach for the Safe Generation and Use of HCN in a Multistep Continuous Preparation of Chiral O-Acetylcyanohydrins

Aischarya Brahma
a   IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
b   Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK   eMail: svl1000@cam.ac.uk
,
Biagia Musio
b   Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK   eMail: svl1000@cam.ac.uk
,
Uliviya Ismayilova
c   Institute of Nano- and Biotechnologies (INB), Aachen University of Applied Sciences, 52428 Jülich, Germany
,
Nikzad Nikbin
b   Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK   eMail: svl1000@cam.ac.uk
,
Sonja B. Kamptmann
b   Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK   eMail: svl1000@cam.ac.uk
,
Petra Siegert
c   Institute of Nano- and Biotechnologies (INB), Aachen University of Applied Sciences, 52428 Jülich, Germany
,
Günter E. Jeromin
c   Institute of Nano- and Biotechnologies (INB), Aachen University of Applied Sciences, 52428 Jülich, Germany
,
Steven V. Ley*
b   Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK   eMail: svl1000@cam.ac.uk
,
Martina Pohl
a   IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 03. August 2015

Accepted after revision: 03. September 2015

Publikationsdatum:
29. September 2015 (online)


Abstract

An enantioselective preparation of O-acetylcyanohydrins has been accomplished by a three-step telescoped continuous process. The modular components enabled an accurate control of two sequential biotransformations, safe handling of an in situ generated hazardous gas, and in-line stabilization of products. This method proved to be advantageous over the batch protocols in terms of reaction time (40 min vs 345 min) and ease of operation, opening up access to reactions which have often been neglected due to safety concerns.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 These authors did the main part of the experiments and contributed equally. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
  • 2 Present address: Novartis Pharma, AG WSJ-42.2.08, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
    • 3a Nestl BM, Hammer SC, Nebel BA, Hauer B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 3070
    • 3b Torrelo G, Hanefeld U, Hollmann F. Catal. Lett. 2014; 145: 309
    • 4a Hollinshead DM, Howell SC, Ley SV, Mahon M, Ratcliffe NM, Worthington PA. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1983; 1579
    • 4b Multistep Enzyme Catalysis: Biotransformations and Chemoenzymatic Synthesis. Garcia-Junceda E. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2008
    • 4c Pahari P, Kharel MK, Shepherd MD, van Lanen SG, Rohr J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 1216
    • 4d Wagner N, Bosshart A, Failmezger J, Bechtold M, Panke S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 4182
    • 4e Heidlindemann M, Hammel M, Scheffler U, Mahrwald R, Hummel W, Berkessel A, Gröger H. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 80: 3387
    • 5a Köhler V, Wilson YM, Dürrenberger M, Ghislieri D, Churakova E, Quinto T, Knörr L, Häussinger D, Hollmann F, Turner NJ, Ward TR. Nat. Chem. 2013; 5: 93
    • 5b Parmeggiani F, Lovelock SL, Weise NJ, Ahmed ST, Turner NJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 4608
    • 6a Baxendale IR, Brocken L, Mallia CJ. Green Process. Synth. 2013; 2: 211
    • 6b McQuade DT, Seeberger PH. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 6384
    • 7a Alonso N, Muñoz JD. M, Egle B, Vrijdag JL, de Borggraeve WM, de la Hoz A, Díaz-Ortiz A, Alcázar J. J. Flow Chem. 2014; 4: 105
    • 7b Müller ST. R, Wirth T. ChemSusChem 2015; 8: 245
    • 7c Gasparini G, Archer I, Jones E, Ashe R. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012; 16: 1013
    • 7d Gutmann B, Cantillo D, Kappe CO. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 6688
    • 8a Pastre JC, Browne DL, Ley SV. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 8849
    • 8b Newton S, Carter CF, Pearson CM, Alves LC, Lange H, Thansandote P, Ley SV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 4915
    • 8c Webb D, Jamison TF. Chem. Sci. 2010; 1: 675
    • 8d Pellegatti L, Sedelmeier J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2015; 19: 551
    • 8e Ingham RJ, Battilocchio C, Fitzpatrick DE, Sliwinski E, Hawkins JM, Ley SV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 144
    • 8f Ghislieri D, Gilmore K, Seeberger PH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 678
    • 8g Sans V, Porwol L, Dragone V, Cronin L. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 1258
    • 8h Maurya RA, Min K.-I, Kim D.-P. Green Chem. 2014; 16: 116
    • 9a Babich L, Hartog AF, Van Hemert LJ. C, Rutjes FP. J. T, Wever R. ChemSusChem 2012; 5: 2348
    • 9b Yuryev R, Strompen S, Liese A. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011; 7: 1449
    • 9c Itabaiana I, Leal IC. R, Miranda LS. M, Souza RO. M. A. J. Flow Chem. 2013; 3: 122
    • 10a Jones E, McClean K, Housden S, Gasparini G, Archer I. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2012; 90: 726
    • 10b Le Joubioux F, Bridiau N, Sanekli M, Graber M, Maugard T. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2014; 109: 143
    • 10c Baxendale IR, Ernst M, Krahnert W.-R, Ley SV. Synlett 2002; 1641
    • 10d Baxendale IR, Griffiths-Jones CM, Ley SV, Tranmer GK. Synlett 2006; 427
    • 10e Andrade LH, Kroutil W, Jamison TF. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 6092
    • 10f Tomaszewski B, Lloyd RC, Warr AJ, Buehler K, Schmid A. ChemCatChem 2014; 6: 2567
    • 11a Schmidt M, Griengl H. Top. Curr. Chem. 1999; 200: 193
    • 11b Griengl H, Schwab H, Fechter M. Trends Biotechnol. 2000; 18: 252
    • 11c Holt J, Hanefeld U. Curr. Org. Synth. 2009; 6: 15
    • 11d Dadashipour M, Asano Y. ACS Catal. 2011; 1: 1121
    • 12a Andexer J, von Langermann J, Mell A, Bocola M, Kragl U, Eggert T, Pohl M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 8679
    • 12b Andexer JN, Staunig N, Eggert T, Kratky C, Pohl M, Gruber K. ChemBioChem 2012; 13: 1932
    • 12c Okrob D, Paravidino M, Orru RV. A, Wiechert W, Hanefeld U, Pohl M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011; 353: 2399
    • 12d Scholz KE, Okrob D, Kopka B, Grünberger A, Pohl M, Jaeger KE, Krauss U. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012; 78: 5025
    • 12e Kopka B, Diener M, Wirtz A, Pohl M, Jaeger K.-E, Krauss U. Biotechnol. J. 2015; 10: 811
    • 13a Bauer M, Geyer R, Boy M, Griengl H, Steiner W. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 1998; 5: 343
    • 13b Costes D, Wehtje E, Adlercreutz P. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999; 25: 384
    • 13c Andexer JN, von Langermann J, Kragl U, Pohl M. Trends Biotechnol. 2009; 27: 599
  • 14 North M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003; 14: 147
  • 15 Pritchard JD. HPA Compendium of Chemical Hazards: Hydrogen Cyanide. 2011: 1-31
  • 16 Denmark SE, Chan W. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 4002
  • 17 Park EJ, Lee S, Chang S. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 2760
  • 18 Abiko Y, Yamagiwa N, Sugita M, Tian J, Matsunaga S, Shibasaki M. Synlett 2004; 2434
  • 19 Watahiki T, Ohba S, Oriyama T. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 2679
  • 20 Belokon YN, Gutnov AV, Moskalenko M, Yashkina LV, Lesovoy DE, Ikonnikov NS, Larichev VS, North M. Chem. Commun. 2002; 244
    • 21a Wang J, Li W, Liu Y, Chu Y, Lin L, Liu X, Feng X. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 1280 ; and references 6 and 7 within
    • 21b Purkarthofer T, Skranc W, Weber H, Griengl H, Wubbolts M, Scholz G, Pöchlauer P. Tetrahedron 2004; 60: 735
  • 22 Ismayilova U. Bachelor Thesis. Aachen University of Applied Sciences; Germany: 2014
  • 23 Delville MM. E, Koch K, van Hest JC. M, Rutjes FP. J. T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 1634
  • 24 Tufvesson P, Lima-Ramos J, Nordblad M, Woodley JM. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011; 15: 266

    • General procedure for the three-step cascade synthesis of chiral O-acetylcyanohydrins in flow: A 1 M solution of ECF in microaqueous MTBE was pumped (0.04 mL/min) into a 10 cm packed-bed reactor containing CalB (277 mg). This first output, consisting of 1 M solution of HCN, was mixed with a 0.5 M solution of aldehyde 1af in micro-aqueous MTBE (0.04 mL/min–1) by means of a tee piece assembly. The resulting mixture was passed through a second bioreactor (Kinesis, Benchmark microbore column 3 mm/100 mm 2 × F), containing lyophilized E. coli-AtHNL- (250 mg), prepared as described in the SI (section S5). A back pressure regulator (5 Bar) was introduced after the packed bed reactor. The out coming solution was mixed with a mixture of pyridine/acetic anhydride (1:1) pumped by a compact HPLC pump (Knauer) and the resulting solution was passed through a PTFE coil (2 mL). The layers were collected and a sample (50 μL in 500 μL of CDCl3) was analyzed by NMR to check the formation of (R)-3a, (R)-3b, (R)-3c, (R)-3d, (S)-3e and (R)-3f (75–99%). The optical purity of the products (40–98%) was assessed by GC analysis. CAUTION: special precautions must be taken because the HCN is highly toxic. All work was carried in a well ventilated fumehood and a gas monitor for HCN was used during all the stages of the experiments. The excess of HCN (1 eq) was treated with an aqueous solution of sodium hypochlorite (10–15%) until neutralization. The spectroscopic data of compounds 3af are in accordance with literature:
    • 25a For 3a, see: Kadam ST, Kim SS. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 6330
    • 25b For 3b, see: Khan NU. H, Agrawal S, Kureshy RI, Abdi SH. R, Mayani VJ, Jasra RV. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2007; 264: 140
    • 25c For 3c, see: Okrob D, Paravidino M, Orru RV. a, Wiechert W, Hanefeld U, Pohl M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011; 353: 2399
    • 25d For 3e, see: Sakai T, Wang K, Ema T. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 2178
    • 25e For 3f, see: Candiano G, Bruschi M, Musante L, Santucci L, Ghiggeri GM, Carnemolla B, Orecchia P, Zardi L, Righetti PG. Electrophoresis 2004; 25: 1327 (R)-2-O-Acetyl-2-(2-nitrophenyl)acetonitrile (3d): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.21 (s, 3 H), 7.09 (s, 1 H), 7.68 (dt, J = 8.2, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.80 (dt, J = 7.7, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.93 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 8.20 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.2 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.1, 59.6, 115.0, 125.8, 129.3, 131.3, 134.5, 147.0, 168.3. IR (Neat): 3123, 3036, 2333, 1756, 1399, 1116, 1064 cm–1. HRMS: m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C10H9O4N2: 221.0557; found: 221.0547