Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75(08): 808-818
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1557819
Review
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sonographic Assessment of the Umbilical Cord

Sonografie der Nabelschnur
S. Bosselmann
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg
2   Pränatalzentrum Stuttgart, Stuttgart
,
G. Mielke
2   Pränatalzentrum Stuttgart, Stuttgart
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 13 April 2015
revised 30 May 2015

accepted 03 June 2015

Publication Date:
31 August 2015 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The umbilical cord (UC) is a vital connection between fetus and placenta. It constitutes a stable connection to the fetomaternal interface, while allowing the fetal mobility that is of great importance for fetal development in general and fetal neuromotor development in particular. This combination of mechanical stability and flexibility is due to the architecture of the UC. There is however a range of umbilical cord complications that may be life threatening to the fetus and these too can be explained to a large extent by the cordʼs structural characteristics. This review article discusses clinically relevant aspects of UC ultrasound.

Zusammenfassung

Die Nabelschnur ist die lebenswichtige Verbindung zwischen Fetus und Plazenta. Sie bildet einerseits eine stabile Verbindung zur zentralen Einheit des fetomaternalen Stoffwechsels und ermöglicht dem Feten andererseits eine Beweglichkeit, die für die körperliche – insbesondere die neuromotorische – Entwicklung von großer Bedeutung ist. Diese Kombination aus mechanischer Stabilität und Flexibilität begründet sich in der Architektur der Nabelschnur. Es gibt jedoch eine Reihe an Nabelschnurkomplikationen, die den Feten z. T. lebensbedrohlich gefährden können. Auch diese lassen sich vor allem auf die strukturellen Eigenschaften der Nabelschnur zurückführen. Im Rahmen einer Übersichtsarbeit werden klinisch relevante Aspekte der sonografischen Diagnostik der Nabelschnur besprochen.

Key words

ultrasound - fetal period - umbilical cord

Schlüsselwörter

Ultraschall - Fetalzeit - Nabelschnur

Supporting Information

 

  • References

  • 1 Ferguson VL, Dodson RB. Bioengineering aspects of the umbilical cord. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144 (Suppl. 01) S108-S113
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E et al. Sonographic measurement of the umbilical cord and fetal anthropometric parameters. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 83: 131-135
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gordon Z, Eytan O, Jaffa AJ et al. Hemodynamic analysis of Hyrtl anastomosis in human placenta. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 292: R977-R982
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bhutia KL, Sengupta R, Upreti B et al. Pregnancy-induced hypertension is associated with altered anatomical patterns of Hyrtlʼs anastomosis. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2014; 297: 819-825
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Raio L, Ghezzi F, di Naro E et al. In-utero characterization of the blood flow in the Hyrtl anastomosis. Placenta 2001; 22: 597-601
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E et al. Prenatal assessment of the Hyrtl anastomosis and evaluation of its function: case report. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1890-1893
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Strong jr. TH, Jarles DL, Vega JS et al. The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 29-32
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mittal A, Nanda S, Sen J. Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 291: 763-768
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Narayan R, Saaid R, Pedersen L et al. Ultrasound assessment of umbilical cord morphology in the first trimester: a feasibility study. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015; [Epub ahead of print]
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Verkleij CP, van Oppen AC, Mulder EJ et al. Evaluation of antenatal umbilical coiling index at 16–21 weeks of gestation as a predictor of trisomy 21 and other chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 545-552
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moshiri M, Zaidi SF, Robinson TJ et al. Comprehensive imaging review of abnormalities of the umbilical cord. Radiographics 2014; 34: 179-196
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jessop FA, Lees CC, Pathak S et al. Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review. Virchows Arch 2014; 464: 105-112
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rayburn WF, Beynen A, Brinkman DL. Umbilical cord length and intrapartum complications. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57: 450-452
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hill LM, DiNofrio DM, Guzick D. Sonographic determination of first trimester umbilical cord length. J Clin Ultrasound 1994; 22: 435-438
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Murphy A, Platt LD. First-trimester diagnosis of body stalk anomaly using 2- and 3-dimensional sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 1739-1743
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Prefumo F, Izzi C. Fetal abdominal wall defects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28: 391-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Smrcek JM, Germer U, Krokowski M et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and management of body stalk anomaly: analysis of nine singleton and two multiple pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 322-328
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ugurlucan FG, Yuksel A. Is complete umbilical cord scanning possible at the second-trimester ultrasound scan?. J Clin Ultrasound 2014;
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Hasegawa J, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K et al. Ultrasound diagnosis and management of umbilical cord abnormalities. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 48: 23-27
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Oyelese Y, Catanzarite V, Prefumo F et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937-942
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rao KP, Belogolovkin V, Yankowitz J et al. Abnormal placentation: evidence-based diagnosis and management of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012; 67: 503-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 927-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gagnon R, Morin L, Bly S et al. SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: guidelines for the management of vasa previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 108: 85-89
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ruiter L, Kok N, Limpens J et al. Systematic review of accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vasa previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 516-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rebarber A, Dolin C, Fox NS et al. Natural history of vasa previa across gestation using a screening protocol. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 141-147
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mastroiacovo P, Lisi A, Castilla EE et al. Gastroschisis and associated defects: an international study. Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A: 660-671
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bonilla jr. F, Raga F, Villalaiz E et al. Umbilical cord cysts: evaluation with different 3-dimensional sonographic modes. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 281-285
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Zangen R, Boldes R, Yaffe H et al. Umbilical cord cysts in the second and third trimesters: significance and prenatal approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 296-301
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hannaford K, Reeves S, Wegner E. Umbilical cord cysts in the first trimester: are they associated with pregnancy complications?. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 801-806
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Avnet H, Shen O, Mazaki E et al. Four-vessel umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 604-606
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Voskamp BJ, Fleurke-Rozema H, Oude-Rengerink K et al. Relationship of isolated single umbilical artery to fetal growth, aneuploidy and perinatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 622-628
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sepulveda W, Peek MJ, Hassan J et al. Umbilical vein to artery ratio in fetuses with single umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 23-26
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dagklis T, Defigueiredo D, Staboulidou I et al. Isolated single umbilical artery and fetal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 291-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mailath-Pokorny M, Worda K, Schmid M et al. Isolated single umbilical artery: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 184: 80-83
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chaoui R, Heling KS, Karl K. Ultrasound of the fetal veins part 1: the intrahepatic venous system. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35: 208-228
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Weichert J, Hartge D, Germer U et al. Persistent right umbilical vein: a prenatal condition worth mentioning?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 543-548
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lee SW, Kim MY, Kim JE et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of antenatal fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix detection. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2014; 57: 181-186
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Allen SL, Bagnall C, Roberts AB et al. Thrombosing umbilical vein varix. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17: 189-192
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Sepulveda W, Mackenna A, Sanchez J et al. Fetal prognosis in varix of the intrafetal umbilical vein. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17: 171-175
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Byers BD, Goharkhay N, Mateus J et al. Pregnancy outcome after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 282-286
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Zalel Y, Lehavi O, Heifetz S et al. Varix of the fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein: prenatal sonographic diagnosis and suggested in utero management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 476-478
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Valsky DV, Rosenak D, Hochner-Celnikier D et al. Adverse outcome of isolated fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix despite close monitoring. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 451-454
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kong CW, Chan LW, To WW. Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery in the presence of nuchal cord loops: implications on patient counselling and the mode of delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 283-289
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Dias T, Mahsud-Dornan S, Bhide A et al. Cord entanglement and perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 201-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Impact of cord entanglement on perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twins: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 131-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Lin MG. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2006; 61: 269-277
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hasbun J, Alcalde JL, Sepulveda W. Three-dimensional power Doppler sonography in the prenatal diagnosis of a true knot of the umbilical cord: value and limitations. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1215-1220
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Abuhamad A. Three-dimensional ultrasound with color Doppler imaging of an umbilical cord true knot. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 360
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Sathiyathasan S, Jeyanthan K, Hamid R. Umbilical hemangioma: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283 (Suppl. 01) 15-17
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Satge DC, Laumond MA, Desfarges F et al. An umbilical cord teratoma in a 17-week-old fetus. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 284-288
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Berry SM, Stone J, Norton ME et al. Fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 170-180
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Kunavikatikul C et al. Cordocentesis at 16–24 weeks of gestation: experience of 1,320 cases. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 224-228
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Seoud M, Aboul-Hosn L, Nassar A et al. Spontaneous umbilical cord hematoma: a rare cause of acute fetal distress. Am J Perinatol 2001; 18: 99-102
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Jouannelle C, Giansily-Blaizot M, Monpoux F et al. Spontaneous umbilical cord haematoma and congenital factor VII deficiency. Haemophilia 2012; 18: e24-e25
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar