J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76(05): 385-389
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1551668
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Inaccurate Assessments of Anterior Cranial Base Malignancy Following Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction

Erika Walsh
1   Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
,
Elisa Illing
1   Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
,
Kristen O. Riley
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
,
Joel Cure
3   Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
,
Aviva Srubiski
4   Department of Otolaryngology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
,
Richard J. Harvey
4   Department of Otolaryngology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
,
Bradford A. Woodworth
1   Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 August 2014

08 March 2015

Publication Date:
15 May 2015 (online)

Abstract

Objective The nasoseptal flap (NSF) provides vascularized tissue for repair of skull base defects of various etiologies. However, the NSF repair after skull base resection for anterior cranial base malignancies may demonstrate radiologic findings confusing for recurrent or residual disease on postoperative surveillance imaging. The objective of the current study was to review neuroradiologic misinterpretations of NSF reconstruction following anterior cranial base malignancies.

Methods A multicenter review of patients reconstructed with the NSF after endoscopic resection of anterior cranial base malignancies from 2008 to 2013 was performed. Data were collected regarding etiology, surgical technique, locoregional control, and postoperative radiologic assessments. Only patients with at least one postoperative surveillance scan with inaccurate assessment of residual or recurrent malignancy were included in the study.

Results Over 5 years, 13 patients were identified who had erroneous reporting of malignancy due to NSF reconstruction. On average, two neuroradiologists interpreted the NSF as persistent or recurrent malignancy over this time period (range: 1–7). The key findings suspicious for recurrence were enhancement and soft tissue thickening of the NSF. These findings were present in at least one postoperative scan in all patients.

Conclusion Neuroradiologists and rhinologists performing surveillance on patients with a history of skull base malignancy with NSF reconstruction should maintain collaborative efforts to accurately interpret radiologic findings of the NSF during postoperative imaging.

Notes

Presented at the North American Skull Base Society meeting, San Diego, CA, February 15, 2014.


 
  • References

  • 1 Chaaban MR, Woodworth BA, Vattoth S, Tubbs RS, Owen Riley K. Surgical approaches to central skull base and postsurgical imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2013; 34 (5) 476-489
  • 2 Chaaban MR, Chaudhry A, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Simultaneous pericranial and nasoseptal flap reconstruction of anterior skull base defects following endoscopic-assisted craniofacial resection. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (10) 2383-2386
  • 3 Jones V, Virgin F, Riley K, Woodworth BA. Changing paradigms in frontal sinus cerebrospinal fluid leak repair. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2 (3) 227-232
  • 4 Chaaban MR, Conger B, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Transnasal endoscopic repair of posterior table fractures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (6) 1142-1147
  • 5 Blount A, Riley K, Cure J, Woodworth BA. Cerebrospinal fluid volume replacement following large endoscopic anterior cranial base resection. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2 (3) 217-221
  • 6 Virgin F, Barañano CF, Riley K, Woodworth BA. Frontal sinus skull base defect repair using the pedicled nasoseptal flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 145 (2) 338-340
  • 7 Schuster D, Riley KO, Cure JK, Woodworth BA. Endoscopic resection of intracranial dermoid cysts. J Laryngol Otol 2011; 125 (4) 423-427
  • 8 Virgin FW, Bleier BS, Woodworth BA. Evolving materials and techniques for endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010; 43 (3) 653-672, xi xi.
  • 9 Learned KO, Adappa ND, Loevner LA, Palmer JN, Newman JG, Lee JY. MR imaging evaluation of endoscopic cranial base reconstruction with pedicled nasoseptal flap following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (3) 544-551
  • 10 Adappa ND, Learned KO, Palmer JN, Newman JG, Lee JY. Radiographic enhancement of the nasoseptal flap does not predict postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks in endoscopic skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (6) 1226-1234
  • 11 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
  • 12 Phillips J, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Porcine small intestine submucosal grafts for post-tumor resection orbital reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (6) E219-E223
  • 13 Illing E, Chaaban MR, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Porcine small intestine submucosal graft for endoscopic skull base reconstruction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013; 3 (11) 928-932
  • 14 Chaaban MR, Woodworth BA. Complications of skull base reconstruction. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 74: 148-162
  • 15 Chaaban MR, Illing E, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak repair: a five-year prospective evaluation. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (1) 70-75
  • 16 Patel MR, Stadler ME, Snyderman CH , et al. How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations. Skull Base 2010; 20 (6) 397-404
  • 17 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, De Divitiis O, Messina A, De Divitiis E. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2008; 33: 151-199
  • 18 Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL , et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (1) (Suppl. 01) ONS44-ONS52 ; discussion ONS52–ONS53
  • 19 Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (2) 452-459