Multi-size, Multi-angle Microbipolar Forceps for Skull Base Surgery: Technical Note

Abstract

Objective Hemorrhage control in skull base surgery is critical but hindered by the lack of instruments suitable for coagulating structural curves and corners. The main impediment is that most of the instruments currently used are right-angled and unsuitable because anatomical and pathologic structures are three-dimensional objects having complex curves and corners. In this article, we present a solution: the use of angled bipolar microforceps having a range of small diameters and angles for dissection and coagulation.

Methods Utilizing modern design software and up-to-date synthetic and metallic materials, a variety of nonstick bipolar microforceps with different angles and very fine tips (0.2–1.2 mm) were designed and constructed for use on different anatomical and pathologic curves. The tips of the forceps were made very fine to improve coagulation precision as well as to improve microdissection dexterity. The blades were made long and thin to improve visibility during coagulation and dissection procedures. As a result, these multi-size, multiangle micro instruments can be used not only for coagulation but also for microdissection or tumor removal in most anatomical areas accessed during the course of skull base surgery

Results The research, design, and construction of a new bipolar microforceps with different angles and sizes represents a technical innovation that can lead to improved surgical outcomes.

Conclusion The new micro-instruments enhance the quality and quantity of tumor and tissue resection and dissection in skull base surgery and open the possibility of new surgical approaches to microscopic tumor resection and hemorrhage coagulation in the anatomical areas of the skull base.

Keywords

bipolar forceps - skull base surgery - microsurgery - hemostasis - microdissection

• References

• 1 Schick U. Meningiomas involving the sphenoid wing outcome after microsurgical treatment—a clinical review of 73 cases. Cent Eur Neurosurg 2010; 71 (4) 198
• 2 Schick U, Hassler W. Decompression of endocrine orbitopathy via an extended extradural pterional approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147 (2) 143-149 ; discussion 149
• 3 Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA. Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to Meckel's cave and the middle fossa: surgical technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (2) 235-241
• 4 Schick U, Hassler W. Surgical management of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: involvement of the optic canal and visual outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76 (7) 977-983
• 5 Shrivastava RK, Sen C, Costantino PD, Della Rocca R. Sphenoorbital meningiomas: surgical limitations and lessons learned in their long-term management. J Neurosurg 2005; 103 (3) 491-497
• 6 Safavi-Abbasi S, Zabramski JM, Deshmukh P , et al. Moving toward the petroclival region: a model for quantitative and anatomical analysis of tumor shift. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (4) 797-804
• 7 Ichimura S, Kawase T, Onozuka S, Yoshida K, Ohira T. Four subtypes of petroclival meningiomas: differences in symptoms and operative findings using the anterior transpetrosal approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150 (7) 637-645
• 8 Ramina R, Neto MC, Fernandes YB, Aguiar PH, de Meneses MS, Torres LF. Meningiomas of the jugular foramen. Neurosurg Rev 2006; 29 (1) 55-60
• 9 Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA. Resection of large petroclival meningiomas by the simple retrosigmoid route. J Clin Neurosci 1999; 6 (1) 27-30
• 10 Komatsu F, Komatsu M, Di Ieva A, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic approaches to the trigeminal nerve and clinical consideration for trigeminal schwannomas: a cadaveric study. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (4) 690-696