Semin Plast Surg 2015; 29(02): 085-093
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549049
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Delay Fill Technique: A Safer Approach to Combination Augmentation Mastopexy

Christopher K. Patronella
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
,
Henry A. Mentz
2   The Aesthetic Center for Plastic Surgery, Houston Texas
,
Jaclyn Johnson-Alviza
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 April 2015 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Combining breast augmentation with mastopexy is a challenging procedure that has a relatively high revision rate in the literature. Some surgeons prefer a two-stage procedure to avoid the potential for skin flap or nipple–areolar complex necrosis that can occur with a one-stage procedure. The authors compared 101 patients who had subpectoral breast augmentation with immediate implant fill and mastopexy with 203 patients who had subpectoral breast augmentation with delayed (10–14 days) implant fill and mastopexy. They found the revision rate for immediate implant fill was 24%; in the delayed implant fill group, the revision rate was 10.3%. Patients had soft tissue-related complications in 16% of the immediate fill group and in 2% of the delayed fill group. Delaying implant fill in combined breast augmentation mastopexy significantly reduces the risk of soft tissue-related complications and revision procedures; the delay flap phenomenon is responsible for fewer wound-healing complications when implant fill is delayed during a combined augmentation mastopexy procedure.